An interventional study of personalized support program in Oncologic Disorders and Tumor, sponsored by University Hospital, Lille. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-21.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Lille · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Elderly cancer patients need more help from their relatives and for longer than young adults.
Our hypothesis of research is that the needs and resources to help the couple " elderly patient/caregiver ", are at least in part socially determined and that the implementation of a personalized support plan to help the caregiver (PSP) taking into account needs, resources and expectations of the primary caregiver in addition to those of elderly patients with cancer may partly correct inequalities. The PSP should allow a better management of cancer, a lesser burden for the caregiver and a better quality of life for both the caregiver and the patient.
Scientific context Elderly cancer patients need more help from their relatives and for longer than young adults. The person who takes primary responsibility for someone who cannot care fully for themselves is called the primary caregiver.
A recent personal study concerning elderly cancer patients caregivers show that most caregivers reported high or moderate levels of psychological distress, with an impact on their own health status.
In addition, family caregivers often report deficits in information about the disease, in training and skills related to their patients' care, and a lack of assistance from healthcare professionals.
The ability of the primary caregiver to meet the medical, material and emotional needs of the patient depends on their own resources (psychological, physical, intellectual, physical, financial) and on the diversity of their social network, but it also depends on the quality of the personalized support program (including information and training) that has been established for them.
Research hypotheses
Our hypothesis of research is that the needs and resources to help the couple " elderly patient/caregiver ", are at least in part socially determined and that the implementation of a personalized support plan to help the caregiver (PSP) taking into account needs, resources and expectations of the primary caregiver in addition to those of elderly patients with cancer may partly correct inequalities. The PSP should allow a better management of cancer, a lesser burden for the caregiver and a better quality of life for both the caregiver and the patient.
Intervention description
Prospective, interventional, randomized trial, with 118 patients in each group:
All the "couples patient / caregiver' will benefit initially from:
Randomization will be stratified according to:
Intervention Stage 1: A semi-structured interview centered on the caregiver's needs (COAT tool) Stage 2: guided questionnaires to assess the psychosocial situation of caregivers Stage 3: implementation of a multi-component PSP (information, counseling, listening time, training to help overcome their difficulties as a caregiver, planning for future care) Stage 4: at least one monthly phone interview Stage 5: 6 months follow up on the psychosocial characteristics of caregivers
Expected results in public health Our study will help to better define the way to take better account of the needs of the helper / helped couple, and reinforce the role of the coordinating nurse in the care pathways.
If our hypotheses can confirmed that there is a link between the caregivers needs and the social determinants of health and that the intervention has a positive impact on the caregivers burden and stress, it will suggest that this intervention not only acts favorably on social inequalities in health, but it can help reduce health care costs, as the caregiver exhaustion increases the risk of health expenditure (drug consumption, hospitalization of the patient and of the caregiver).
9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 78 is above the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.
Browse Neoplasms studies →University Hospital, Lille is the lead sponsor of 625 studies on the registry; 141 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Be the primary caregiver for at least one month of a subject
Exclusion Criteria:
usual care
interview of the primary caregivers to identify their needs and expectations, the implementation of a "personalized support program", including telephone follow-up
Other: personalized support program
interview of the primary caregivers to identify their needs and expectations, the implementation of a "personalized support program", including telephone follow-up
change in caregiver burden (22 items Zarit Burden Interview)
Time frame: 6 months
Link between caregiver burden (ZBI) and the indicator of precariousness (EPICES score)
Time frame: baseline evaluation
psychosocial characteristics of caregivers of patients with cancer
Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) Carers' Assessment of Managing Index (CAMI) Inventory of social support (ISSB) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Cognitive Inventory of Subjective Distress (CISD) Subjective well-being scale (BES)
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
Link between caregiver burden and geriatric syndromes
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
Link between caregiver burden and stage of cancer / time from cancer diagnosis
Time frame: baseline
Match between caregiver personalized support plan (PSP) objectives and effective implemented PSP
Time frame: 6 months
Time spent for the development and implementation of the caregiver personalized support plan
Time frame: 6 months
Relationship between needs and EPICES score
Time frame: baseline
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Lille