CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02285296Updated Apr 21, 2026

The Needs and Burden of Family Caregivers of Older Adults With Cancer

An interventional study of personalized support program in Oncologic Disorders and Tumor, sponsored by University Hospital, Lille. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-21.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Lille · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Elderly cancer patients need more help from their relatives and for longer than young adults.

Our hypothesis of research is that the needs and resources to help the couple " elderly patient/caregiver ", are at least in part socially determined and that the implementation of a personalized support plan to help the caregiver (PSP) taking into account needs, resources and expectations of the primary caregiver in addition to those of elderly patients with cancer may partly correct inequalities. The PSP should allow a better management of cancer, a lesser burden for the caregiver and a better quality of life for both the caregiver and the patient.

Read the detailed description

Scientific context Elderly cancer patients need more help from their relatives and for longer than young adults. The person who takes primary responsibility for someone who cannot care fully for themselves is called the primary caregiver.

A recent personal study concerning elderly cancer patients caregivers show that most caregivers reported high or moderate levels of psychological distress, with an impact on their own health status.

In addition, family caregivers often report deficits in information about the disease, in training and skills related to their patients' care, and a lack of assistance from healthcare professionals.

The ability of the primary caregiver to meet the medical, material and emotional needs of the patient depends on their own resources (psychological, physical, intellectual, physical, financial) and on the diversity of their social network, but it also depends on the quality of the personalized support program (including information and training) that has been established for them.

Research hypotheses

Our hypothesis of research is that the needs and resources to help the couple " elderly patient/caregiver ", are at least in part socially determined and that the implementation of a personalized support plan to help the caregiver (PSP) taking into account needs, resources and expectations of the primary caregiver in addition to those of elderly patients with cancer may partly correct inequalities. The PSP should allow a better management of cancer, a lesser burden for the caregiver and a better quality of life for both the caregiver and the patient.

Intervention description

Prospective, interventional, randomized trial, with 118 patients in each group:

  • an experimental interventional arm including an interview of the primary caregivers to identify their needs and expectations, the implementation of a "personalized support program", including telephone follow-up
  • A control arm corresponding to the standard care. Caregiver aid is usually proposed when accompanying a sick relative in consultation or hospitalization.

All the "couples patient / caregiver' will benefit initially from:

  1. a comprehensive geriatric assessment (elderly patients with cancer)
  2. an assessment of caregiver burden by the Zarit burden interview (ZBI)
  3. an assessment of subjective well-being
  4. an individual assessment of the precariousness and health inequalities based on the score EPICES (Evaluation of precariousness and health inequalities in the health Centers)

Randomization will be stratified according to:

  • living in the same household or not
  • score of initial Zarit Burden Interview

Intervention Stage 1: A semi-structured interview centered on the caregiver's needs (COAT tool) Stage 2: guided questionnaires to assess the psychosocial situation of caregivers Stage 3: implementation of a multi-component PSP (information, counseling, listening time, training to help overcome their difficulties as a caregiver, planning for future care) Stage 4: at least one monthly phone interview Stage 5: 6 months follow up on the psychosocial characteristics of caregivers

Expected results in public health Our study will help to better define the way to take better account of the needs of the helper / helped couple, and reinforce the role of the coordinating nurse in the care pathways.

If our hypotheses can confirmed that there is a link between the caregivers needs and the social determinants of health and that the intervention has a positive impact on the caregivers burden and stress, it will suggest that this intervention not only acts favorably on social inequalities in health, but it can help reduce health care costs, as the caregiver exhaustion increases the risk of health expenditure (drug consumption, hospitalization of the patient and of the caregiver).

02

Conditions studied

  • Oncologic Disorders
  • Tumor

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • geriatric assessment
  • Caregivers
  • Needs Assessment
  • oncology nursing
  • frail elderly
  • Medical, psychologic and sociologic approach
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 78 is above the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Lille is the lead sponsor of 625 studies on the registry; 141 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Identification of a patient / caregiver couple
  • Be the primary caregiver for at least one month of a subject

    • Age ≥70 years
    • With cancer
    • Who benefited a comprehensive geriatric assessement at University Lille Hospital or Centre Oscar Lambret
    • Affiliated to a social security or receiving an equivalent system of social protection
  • caregiver able to understand the nature, purpose and methodology of the study
  • caregiver able to cooperate in interviews and questionnaires
  • Written informed consent of the caregiver and the cancer patient provided before any study specific procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Caregiver \< 18 years old
  • Legal inability or restricted legal ability
  • Inability to attend or comply with interventions or follow-up scheduling, disability or difficulty preventing a proper understanding of trial instructions
  • patient's life expectancy less than 6 months (clinical assessment)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
78 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    control arm

    usual care

  • Experimental
    personalized support program

    interview of the primary caregivers to identify their needs and expectations, the implementation of a "personalized support program", including telephone follow-up

    Other: personalized support program

Interventions

  • Otherpersonalized support program

    interview of the primary caregivers to identify their needs and expectations, the implementation of a "personalized support program", including telephone follow-up

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change in caregiver burden (22 items Zarit Burden Interview)

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Link between caregiver burden (ZBI) and the indicator of precariousness (EPICES score)

    Time frame: baseline evaluation

  2. psychosocial characteristics of caregivers of patients with cancer

    Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) Carers' Assessment of Managing Index (CAMI) Inventory of social support (ISSB) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Cognitive Inventory of Subjective Distress (CISD) Subjective well-being scale (BES)

    Time frame: baseline and 6 months

  3. Link between caregiver burden and geriatric syndromes

    Time frame: baseline and 6 months

  4. Link between caregiver burden and stage of cancer / time from cancer diagnosis

    Time frame: baseline

  5. Match between caregiver personalized support plan (PSP) objectives and effective implemented PSP

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Time spent for the development and implementation of the caregiver personalized support plan

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Relationship between needs and EPICES score

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
    Lille, France
  • University hospital, Lille
    Lille, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Horn M, D'Hondt F, Vaiva G, Thomas P, Pins D. Categorical perception of familiarity: Evidence for a hyper-familiarity in schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Dec;71:63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Sep 30. PubMed 26452199 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02285296
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Lille
Collaborators
Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Lille Nord de France, National Cancer Institute, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2014
Start date
Dec 11, 2014
Primary completion
Jun 12, 2017
Completion
Dec 1, 2017
Last update
Apr 21, 2026

Study contacts

GAXATTE Cédric, MD
study chair · University Hospital, Lille

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion