An observational study in Intubation and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, sponsored by International Institute of Rescue Research and Education. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-10-29.
Sponsored by International Institute of Rescue Research and Education · Observational
The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of four intubation devices ( in a cardiopulmonary scenario with uninterrupted chest compressions with a standardized manikin model.
The investigators hypothesized that fiberoscope laryngoscopes may improve success rates.
Devices using in study:
The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope (BONFILS)(KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA), The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope (RIFL)( AI Medical Devices, Inc., Williamston, MI, USA), The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope Blade Mac#3(C-MAC®S) (KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA) The Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade no. 3 (MAC) (LifeLine Medical, Inc., Brooksville, FL, USA).
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Personnel of emergency medical services and hospital emergency units
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope the Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope the C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope the Macintosh Laryngoscope
Device: The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope · Device: The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope · Device: The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope · Device: The Macintosh Laryngoscope
Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.
Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.
Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.
Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.
Time to successful intubation
The devices to be compared include (1) The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope , (2) the Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope, (3) the C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope, (4) the Macintosh Laryngoscope. Successful intubation will be measured in the seconds from insertion of an intubation device to the first manual ventilation of the mannequin's lungs.
Time frame: Subjects complete study in 1 day
Success rate of ETI
The devices to be compared include (1) The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope , (2) the Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope, (3) the C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope, (4) the Macintosh Laryngoscope. Successful intubation will be measured in the seconds from insertion of an intubation device to the first manual ventilation of the mannequin's lungs.
Time frame: Subjects complete study in 1 day
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education