An interventional study of The Miller Laryngoscope and The Bonfils intubation fibrescope in Intubation, sponsored by International Institute of Rescue Research and Education. Status unknown at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-11-13.
Sponsored by International Institute of Rescue Research and Education · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study was to compare the four different intubation devices in 6 different scenarios.
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Endotracheal intubation (ETI) during pediatric manikin with uninterrupted chest compressions. Chest compression was performed using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, USA).
Device: The Miller Laryngoscope · Device: The Bonfils intubation fibrescope · Device: The GlideScope Ranger · Device: The Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (SALT)
ETI performed in neutral mannikin head position
Device: The Miller Laryngoscope · Device: The Bonfils intubation fibrescope · Device: The GlideScope Ranger · Device: The Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (SALT)
ETI performed in sniffing mannikin head position
Device: The Miller Laryngoscope · Device: The Bonfils intubation fibrescope · Device: The GlideScope Ranger · Device: The Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (SALT)
ETI performed during mannikin pharyngeal swelling scenario
Device: The Miller Laryngoscope · Device: The Bonfils intubation fibrescope · Device: The GlideScope Ranger · Device: The Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (SALT)
ETI performed during mannikin swollen tongue scenario
Device: The Miller Laryngoscope · Device: The Bonfils intubation fibrescope · Device: The GlideScope Ranger · Device: The Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (SALT)
ETI performed during mannikin immobilized cervical spine scenario
Device: The Miller Laryngoscope · Device: The Bonfils intubation fibrescope · Device: The GlideScope Ranger · Device: The Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (SALT)
Direct laryngoscopy
Optical laryngoscopy
Videolaryngoscopy
Blind intubation
Time to intubation
time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.
Time frame: 1 month
Success of intubation
effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations.
Time frame: 1 month
POGO score
self-reported percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score
Time frame: 1 month
VAS score
participants were asked which method they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation.
Time frame: 1 month
Cormack-Lehane grading
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)
Time frame: 1 month
This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education