CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02257346Updated Jun 9, 2022

Intravenous Lidocaine and Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Delivery

An interventional study of Lidocaine and Normal Saline in Pregnancy, sponsored by Northwestern University. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-09.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
PI terminated study with no subjects enrolled.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

When given intravenously, the local anesthetic lidocaine has been shown to decrease the amount of pain medication patients require when recovering from several types of surgeries. Cesarean delivery is a very common surgery in the United States, effecting more than 1 million women each year. The investigators hypothesize that lidocaine, given during and immediately after a patient undergoes a cesarean section, will help improve a mother's overall recovery experience, as well as positively influence bonding with her new baby.

Read the detailed description

Pain after Cesarean delivery is a common occurrence on the labor and delivery unit. The increased use of neuraxial anesthesia has allowed the administration of neuraxial opioids to help with postoperative pain control. Many patients, however, still require IV and oral opioids in the post anesthesia recovery unit (PACU), and on the postpartum nursing floor. Post Cesarean delivery pain not only has the usual adverse effects common to all postoperative pain (i.e. increased risk for deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, coronary ischemia, pneumonia, poor wound healing, and psychological dysfunction) but also has the potential to adversely affect mother-baby bonding, time spent in skin-to-skin contact and success of initiating effective breastfeeding.

Systemic administration of lidocaine has been shown to decrease opioid consumption, improve recovery of bowel function and promote a better recovery after inpatient procedures. Lidocaine has been shown to have analgesic, antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. It also has an excellent safety profile when given by a low-dose infusion.

Assessing a patient's quality of recovery has become an important outcome in several studies. The patient's capacity to return to her normal activities and effectively care for her newborn is one of the most important signs of a successful surgical procedure, and it has significant economic, sociological and psychological implications.

Quality of recovery -40(QoR-40) is a validated 40-item instrument to assess the quality of post-operative recovery (10). Myles et al. have concluded that the QoR-40 would be a useful outcome measure to assess the impact on changes in health care delivery, but anesthesia studies underutilize this instrument.

This study will evaluate the effect of perioperative systemic lidocaine in the postoperative quality of recovery of patients undergoing Cesarean delivery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Pregnancy
  • Lidocaine
  • Quality
  • Recovery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Class II
  • English speaking
  • Scheduled Cesarean delivery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Chronic opioid use
  • Greater than 2 prior cesarean deliveries
  • Prior myomectomy
  • Prior classical cesarean incision
  • BMI greater than 40
  • History of cardiac disease
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Lidocaine

    Intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/Kg bolus dose and 2mg/Kg/hr infusion

    Drug: Lidocaine

  • Placebo comparator
    Normal Saline

    Intravenous normal saline infusion

    Drug: Normal Saline

Interventions

  • DrugLidocaine

    Lidocaine infusion will be administered immediately after delivery of the fetus and continue through 1 hour into recovery period.

    Also known as: Xylocaine

  • DrugNormal Saline

    Normal Saline will be administered as a placebo immediately after delivery of the fetus and continue through 1 hour into recovery period

    Also known as: 0.9% Saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Recovery 40 on the day after surgery

    The quality of recovery 40 (QoR-40) is a validated questionnaire used to assess several variables that effect a patient's post-operative experience.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid consumption

    Total opioid consumption for the first 24 hours after delivery

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Skin-to-skin time

    Percentage of time a patient spends in skin to skin contact with their newborn in the first 24 hours.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NorthwesternUniversity
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bramson L, Lee JW, Moore E, Montgomery S, Neish C, Bahjri K, Melcher CL. Effect of early skin-to-skin mother--infant contact during the first 3 hours following birth on exclusive breastfeeding during the maternity hospital stay. J Hum Lact. 2010 May;26(2):130-7. doi: 10.1177/0890334409355779. Epub 2010 Jan 28. PubMed 20110561 ↗
  • Koppert W, Weigand M, Neumann F, Sittl R, Schuettler J, Schmelz M, Hering W. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has preventive effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr;98(4):1050-1055. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000104582.71710.EE. PubMed 15041597 ↗
  • Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, Lumb PD. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):235-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00003. PubMed 9459225 ↗
  • Kaba A, Laurent SR, Detroz BJ, Sessler DI, Durieux ME, Lamy ML, Joris JL. Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jan;106(1):11-8; discussion 5-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200701000-00007. PubMed 17197840 ↗
  • Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2008 Nov;95(11):1331-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6375. PubMed 18844267 ↗
  • Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA. 1994 Aug 24-31;272(8):619-26. PubMed 7726894 ↗
  • Guyatt GH, Cook DJ. Health status, quality of life, and the individual. JAMA. 1994 Aug 24-31;272(8):630-1. No abstract available. PubMed 8057520 ↗
  • Watcha MF, Issioui T, Klein KW, White PF. Costs and effectiveness of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen for preventing pain after ambulatory otolaryngologic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Apr;96(4):987-994. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000053255.93270.31. PubMed 12651647 ↗
  • Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016. PubMed 9895071 ↗
  • Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366. PubMed 10740540 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02257346
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Responsible party
Jason Farrer (Clinical Instructor, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 6, 2014
Start date
Nov 1, 2014
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2015
Completion
Feb 15, 2015
Last update
Jun 9, 2022

Study contacts

Jason R Farrer, M.D.
principal investigator · Northwestern University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion