CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02232867Updated Sep 5, 2014

Arm and Leg Cycling Exercise After Stroke

An interventional study of Arm and Leg Cycling Exercise Program in Stroke, sponsored by University of Victoria. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-05.

Sponsored by University of Victoria · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2014), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It has been found that arm and leg cycling is similar to walking in terms of the muscle activation patterns and joint ranges of motion. In addition, arm and leg cycling and walking activate similar neural pathways. Another advantage of arm and leg cycling is that it involves coordination of all four limbs in a rhythmic movement. This may be particularly beneficial given previous findings that arm movement contributes to the activation of leg muscles during walking in humans. This is achieved with interconnected neural pathways that link the arms to the legs. These neural interlimb connections remain intact in stroke victims, such that maximizing the contribution of the arms to the legs may increase coordination for walking. Thus, the objectives of this research are to determine if arm and leg cycling can be used to increase the strength of interlimb connections and if this helps to improve walking ability in a post-stroke population. It is hypothesized that arm and leg cycling will transfer to improvements in walking in a post stroke population.

Read the detailed description

For those who have suffered a stroke, damage to the brain can result in a decreased ability to walk, thus decreasing quality of life in a significant way. Traditionally, body weight supported treadmill training has been used for walking rehabilitation; however, this therapy requires specialized technicians, equipment, and facilities. Arm and leg cycle ergometers, a device commonly found in a gym, could provide an inexpensive and readily accessible means for walking rehabilitation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • rehabilitation
  • stroke
  • walking
  • interlimb connections
03

In context

Stroke

7,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,006 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 5,370 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Victoria is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • stroke
  • lives within the Victoria, Vancouver Island, and Vancouver mainland communities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to stand for 5 minutes unassisted
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm and Leg Cycling Exercise Program

    Multiple baseline test sessions will be used for the same participant to establish a meaningful baseline thus confirming consistency of all outcome measures prior to the intervention.

    Behavioral: Arm and Leg Cycling Exercise Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralArm and Leg Cycling Exercise Program

    Participants will perform arm and leg cycling training three times a week, with 30 minutes of aggregate exercise time per session. To evaluate the physiological cost of exercise, heart rate and a rating of perceived exertion will be collected. The progressive element of this training will include increasing the resistance of the ergometer over the six weeks in order to maintain the same relative exercise stress.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Treadmill Walking Characteristics

    Treadmill walking characteristics will be gauged via a customized analysis of muscle activity patterns and lower limb joint kinematics. Walking frequency, symmetry, and timing will also be analyzed

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following last exercise session)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Interlimb Connections

    To assess the strength of inter-limb coupling, simultaneous electrical stimulation will be applied to (5x1.0ms trains at 300Hz) the cutaneous nerves in the hand (superficial radial) and foot (superficial peroneal). The reflex responses recorded in all four limbs will be evaluated at different phases of the walking cycle.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session)

  2. Fugl-Meyer Assessment

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session)

  3. Brunnstrom recovery stages

    The Brunnstrom Approach emphasises the synergic pattern of movement which develops during recovery from hemiplegia.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session)

  4. Timed up and go test

    The Timed Up and Go test is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three metres, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. During the test, the person is expected to wear their regular footwear and use any mobility aids that they would normally require.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session)

  5. 10 meter walk test

    The 10 meter walk test is a timed test to evaluate walking speed

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following the last exercise session)

  6. Six minute walk test

    The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (average of 4 days following last exercise session)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Rehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory
    Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3N4, Canada
    • Marj Wilder, B.Sc. · Contact · mwilder@uvic.ca
    • E Paul Zehr, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 5, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02232867
Lead sponsor
University of Victoria
Collaborators
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Stroke Network
Responsible party
Dr. E. Paul Zehr (Dr. E. Paul Zehr, University of Victoria) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 5, 2014
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2014 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2015 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 5, 2014

Study contacts

Taryn Klarner, M.Sc.
Contact
rnl@uvic.ca
(250) 472-5487
E. Paul Zehr, PhD
principal investigator · University of Victoria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion