CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02212847Updated Jul 2, 2018

Spatial Orientation and Vestibular Function

An interventional study of vestibular stimulation in Vestibular Perception and Damaged Vestibular System, sponsored by University of Zurich. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-02.

Sponsored by University of Zurich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spatial orientation is achieved through central integration of various sensory inputs and prior knowledge in a statistically optimal way based on the reliability of the different signals. When upright, the subjective visual vertical (SVV) is accurate and precise in healthy human subjects. However, when roll-tilted, both systematic physiologic, roll-angle dependent errors (termed A- und E-effect) and a decrease in precision of SVV estimates have been described. In case of a sudden unilateral vestibular deficit (UVD) a significant imbalance between the two vestibular organs occurs at the level of the vestibular nuclei, disrupting the percept of vertical. The most frequent cause for such a unilateral vestibular deficit is an inflammation of the vestibular nerve by viral infection, termed vestibular neuritis (VN). While in the acute stage these patients are usually immobilized due to the severity of symptoms, recovery is overall good and most patients return to their daily activities within a few weeks. Central compensation is considered the most important contributor to recovery in these patients, while recovery of the damaged vestibular nerve occurs only in a minority of cases. While acute VN presents with sudden UVD, bilateral vestibular deficits (BVD) typically evolve more slowly and re-sult in distinct complaints.

The percept of vertical can be quantified by assessing the subjective visual vertical or SVV, which is usually done by letting subjects adjust a luminous line along perceived direction of gravity. Modifications of this paradigm which are independent from retinal input are e.g. adjustments of a rod along perceived vertical in complete darkness (termed subjective haptic vertical or SHV) and self-alignments along perceived vertical (subjective postural vertical or SPV) and perceived horizontal (subjective postural horizontal or SPH) in complete darkness. Previous research has proposed no unified percept of vertical as errors assessed in different domains (visual, haptic, postural) were diverging in patients with acute UVD. While errors were profound for the SVV, the SPV remained accurate.

Here the investigators aim to quantify verticality perception in patients with either acute or chronic UVD and patients with BVD both in upright and roll-tilted positions. Specifically, the investigators will use different paradigms to address the ques-tion whether there is a unified percept of vertical and how a bias in this percept changes over time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vestibular Perception
  • Damaged Vestibular System
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Zurich is the lead sponsor of 1,030 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. ages 18-75
  2. informed consent
  3. for group 1: acute (i.e. symptom onset less than 72 hours ago) unilateral vestibular deficit as confirmed by clinical examination (pathologic head-impulse test, no skew deviation, no gaze-evoked nystagmus).
  4. for group 2: chronic (i.e. symptom onset more than 4 weeks ago) unilateral vestibular deficit as confirmed by vestibular testing in the acute stage (either abnormal unilateral response on caloric irrigation or video-head-impulse testing).
  5. for group 3: chronic (i.e. symptom onset more than 4 weeks ago) bilateral vestibular deficits as confirmed by vestibular testing (bilaterally reduced response on caloric irrigation or video-head impulse testing).
  6. absence of exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of a peripheral-vestibular deficit (valid only for group 4 - controls)
  2. Disturbed consciousness
  3. Personal history of traumatic brain injury, cerebrovascular disorders, seizures
  4. History of chronic neck complaints including severe neck pain.
  5. Alcohol dependency
  6. Intake of anxiolytic, antidepressant, neuroleptic or sedative medication
  7. Other neurological or systemic disorder which can cause cerebellar deficits, dementia, cognitive dysfunction, visuospatial or tactile neglect, aphasia or visual field deficits
  8. Pregnancy or possible pregnancy if not ruled out by a negative pregnancy test.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    vestibular stimulation

    Other: vestibular stimulation

Interventions

  • Othervestibular stimulation
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. accuracy of verticality perception - baseline and change over 3 months

    The accuracy of verticality perception is defined as the individual median value of a series of line adjustments along perceived direction of gravity (units: degrees). this results in a report of the participants perceived direction of gravity relative to true earth-vertical. Repetitive adjustments will be collected while on the turntable, each adjustment lasting up to 15seconds.

    Time frame: at baseline for the control group (while on the turntable over 1 hour) and change from baseline to follow-up after 3 months for the acute vestibular loss group (again over 1 hour)

Secondary outcomes

  1. precision of verticality perception - baseline and change over 3 months

    The precision of verticality perception is defined as the individual median absolute deviation of single line adjustments along perceived direction of vertical (units: degrees). Repetitive adjustments will be collected while on the turntable, each adjustment lasting up to 15seconds. The resulting value reflects the amount of trial-to-trial variability in a given subject, which is inverse correlated to the precision.

    Time frame: at baseline for the control group (while on the turntable for 1 hour) and change from baseline to follow-up after 3 months for the acute vestibular loss group (again over 1 hour while on the turntable)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Zurich, Division of Neurology
    Zurich, ZH 8091, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02212847
Lead sponsor
University of Zurich
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 8, 2014
Start date
Jul 2013
Primary completion
May 1, 2018
Completion
Jun 28, 2018
Last update
Jul 2, 2018

Study contacts

Dominik Straumann, Prof MD
principal investigator · University Hospital Zurich, Division of Neurology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion