An interventional study of conventional cold snare polypectomy and Cold snare polypectomy with suction in Bowel Cancer, sponsored by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-08-13.
Sponsored by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Different modalities are employed to remove small colonic polyps which potentially harbour a cancer risk. But, they can all vary in their completeness of removal, safety and the histological quality and the gold standard technique has yet to be defined. A novel suction pseudopolyp technique has been described by Patullo et al and in their prospective study, 126 polyps measuring less than 10mm flat or sessile were removed by this method with 100% complete endoscopic resection and without any immediate or delayed complications. The aim of the investigators study is to compare this technique with the standard cold snare technique. Patients attending for a routine colonoscopy and found to have polyps measuring 37mm in size will be eligible and they will be randomised to the polypectomy technique. Patient demographics and polyp characteristics will be recorded. The primary outcome measured will be the macroscopic resection rate. The secondary outcome measures are abdominal pain, tenderness, bleeding and fever.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 207 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
conventional cold snare polypectomy
Procedure: conventional cold snare polypectomy
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Procedure: Cold snare polypectomy with suction
conventional cold snare polypectomy
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Complete macroscopic polyp eradication rate
The primary outcome for this study is the polypectomy completion rate. This will be assessed both macroscopically and histologically. The analysis for statistical difference between the 2 techniques and abdominal symptoms will be compared by the Chi2 test for categorical data.
Time frame: At time of polypectomy intervention
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust