CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02204007Updated Mar 29, 2017Results posted

Real Time 3D Imaging and Surrogate Bone Model

An interventional study of 3D imaging & surrogate bone model in Arthritis, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-29.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Small number of subjects
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an observer-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial to define the efficacy of a new technology developed at the Cleveland Clinic to improve the positioning of the acetabular shell in total hip arthroplasty.The proposed study will enroll patients that have consented to total hip arthroplasty with or without screw fixation for treatment of hip pathology. This treatment is standard of care. Patients will receive standard of care pre- and post-operative care and placement of standard of care implants all of which are commercially available and FDA approved for general use for the clinical indications used in these patients. The only difference in treatment between the groups will be the use of a surrogate bone model to help assist the surgeon visualize the ideal placement of the acetabular component. Diagnostic testing performed specifically related to this study consists of obtaining one pre-operative and one post-operative CT scan. The post-operative scan is to be performed within two weeks of surgery.

The investigators predict that those patients with 3D imaging and bone model will have better acetabular shell placement than those with standard preoperative planning.

Read the detailed description

The plan is enroll 44 subjects (22 in the standard surgery group and 22 in the experimental surgical group) into this randomized clinical trial. All subjects will have the standard of care indications for THA and will give informed consent for both the surgery and participation in this study. Enrollment will occur as part of the routine office evaluation and will be obtained by the treating surgeon or by the research assistant. Four surgeons (Wael Barsoum, Trevor Murray, Carlos Higuera, and Michael Bloomfield) with surgical experience in total hip arthroplasty will perform the procedures in this study. All subjects within each surgeon's practice who qualify for participation in this study will be approached. Subjects will be enrolled at least 10 days prior to the date of surgery. Ten days is the minimum time necessary to obtain a pre-operative CT scan for surgical planning and to manufacture the surrogate bone model. Patients who are not approached during regular office visits will be contacted by phone and if they are interested, they will be scheduled to arrive to the radiology department to sign the informed consent and receive the preoperative CT scan. Subjects will be randomized into either the experimental or control group at the time of consent by the study coordinator. Subjects in the experimental group will have their pre-operative planning done using the 3D surgical simulator and surrogate bone model will be available for the surgeon during surgery. Subjects in the control group will have their pre-operative planning done using plain film x-ray and two-dimensional (2D) templates.

Eligible subjects for inclusion in the study will be able to receive a pelvic CT scan at the Cleveland Clinic. Additionally, we will obtain standard of care pre- and post-operative x-rays (AP view). For subjects randomized into the experimental group, their CT scan DICOM images will be uploaded into the Cleveland Clinic developed surgical simulator specifically designed for THA at least 10 days prior to surgery. For each experimental subject, the Cleveland Clinic pre-operative planning software will be used to define the optimal size and location of the acetabular components (acetabular shell, and the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene bearing - UHMWPE). The treating surgeon will virtually place the implant in the simulator software. The specification for shell placement will vary depending on the subject's individual pathology and pelvic morphology, but is expected to fall within the range of 10-35 degrees of anteversion and 30-50 degrees of abduction.

In the control group, each surgeon will use their standard methods of pre-operative planning using the pre-operative x-rays. To prepare the acetabulum and place the implants on the day of surgery, surgeons will use standard surgical alignment instruments provided by the manufacturer of the implant. For the experimental group, the surgeon will use CT scan and a 3D preoperative planning software to place the implants virtually. The surgeons are provided with a surrogate bone model with a fabricated acetabular implant placed in the same orientation as was planned in the surgical simulator software, and will use standard surgical instruments provided by the manufacturer of the implant.

The images obtained from the post-operative CT scans will be uploaded into the simulator software for 3D reconstruction. The 3D image of the post-operative pelvis with the implants will be superimposed onto the image of the pre-operative pelvis with the virtually placed implants. Using measurement tools within the software we will compare the position of the actual acetabular component placed in the patient with the desired position specified by the plan. The measurements that will be made are for angular orientations in 3D space (anteversion and inclination). Measurements are accurate to within a fraction of a degree.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Acetabular Shell
  • Total Hip Arthroplasty
  • 3D imaging
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 818 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 89 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects to be included in this protocol will be adult males and females of all races and socioeconomic status meeting the following criteria:
  • Primary, unilateral Total hip arthroplasty (THA)
  • 18 to 85 years old at time of surgery
  • Able to get a pre- and post-operative CT scan at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus at least 10 days prior to surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant metal in the joint that results in metal artifact on the pre--operative CT scan, thereby compromising the ability to visualize the acetabulum on the pre-operative simulator.
  • Pregnancy
  • Incarceration
  • Condition deemed by physician or medical staff to be non-conducive to patient's ability to complete the study, or a potential risk to the patient's health and well-being.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    3D imaging, surrogate bone model

    3D imaging \& surrogate bone model

    Device: 3D imaging & surrogate bone model

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care Preoperative Imaging

    Patients receiving standard of care preoperative planning prior to total hip arthroplasty.

Interventions

  • Device3D imaging & surrogate bone model

    3D imaging \& surrogate bone model to assist with acetabular shell placement. Different that standard of care preoperative imaging

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acetabular Shell Version and Inclination

    A CT scan of all patients will be obtained within 2 weeks of surgery to measure placement (acetabular version \& inclination measured in degrees) of the acetabular shell

    Time frame: within 2 weeks of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operative Time

    Duration of the surgical case

    Time frame: time of surgery

07

Results

Posted Mar 29, 2017
Limitations and caveats
Early termination leading to small numbers of subjects analyzed

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone3D Imaging, Surrogate Bone ModelStandard of Care Preoperative Imaging
Started1818
Completed1717
Not completed11
Withdrew: Surgery canceled11

Outcome measures

PrimaryAcetabular Shell Version and Inclination

A CT scan of all patients will be obtained within 2 weeks of surgery to measure placement (acetabular version \& inclination measured in degrees) of the acetabular shell

Time frame:
within 2 weeks of surgery
Reported as:
Mean · degrees
Acetabular Shell Version and Inclination
degrees3D Imaging, Surrogate Bone ModelStandard of Care Preoperative Imaging
Inclination43.4 (34 to 54)39.3 (27 to 55)
Anteversion27.1 (9 to 48)23.3 (9 to 37)
SecondaryOperative Time

Duration of the surgical case

Time frame:
time of surgery
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Operative Time
minutes3D Imaging, Surrogate Bone ModelStandard of Care Preoperative Imaging
Operative Time128.9 (76 to 179)151.2 (82 to 291)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
3D Imaging, Surrogate Bone Model—0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)
Standard of Care Preoperative Imaging—0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)3D Imaging, Surrogate Bone ModelStandard of Care Preoperative ImagingTotal
Mean65.4 (44 to 80)58.6 (41 to 82)62.0 (41 to 82)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)3D Imaging, Surrogate Bone ModelStandard of Care Preoperative ImagingTotal
Female9514
Male81220
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Codsi MJ, Bennetts C, Gordiev K, Boeck DM, Kwon Y, Brems J, Powell K, Iannotti JP. Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.010. Epub 2008 Mar 7. PubMed 18328741 ↗
  • Scalise JJ, Bryan J, Polster J, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP. Quantitative analysis of glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis using three-dimensional computed tomography scans. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.013. Epub 2008 Jan 22. PubMed 18218326 ↗
  • Scalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Iannotti JP. The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Feb 20. PubMed 18282721 ↗
  • Scalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90(11):2438-45. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01341. PubMed 18978413 ↗
  • Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengstrom A, Elmstedt E. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4):457-62. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.31245. PubMed 12066276 ↗
  • Furnes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 May;83(4):579-86. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b4.11223. PubMed 11380136 ↗
  • Older J. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: a worldwide retrospective review at 15 to 20 years. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Sep;17(6):675-80. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.31973. PubMed 12216018 ↗
  • Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, Mahomed NN, Lingard EA, Guadagnoli E, Baron JA, Harris WH, Poss R, Katz JN. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):20-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00004. PubMed 12533567 ↗
  • Parvizi J, Wade FA, Rapuri V, Springer BD, Berry DJ, Hozack WJ. Revision hip arthroplasty for late instability secondary to polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:66-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218751.14989.a6. PubMed 16672896 ↗
  • Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84(10):1788-92. PubMed 12377909 ↗
  • Dorr LD, Wolf AW, Chandler R, Conaty JP. Classification and treatment of dislocations of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Mar;(173):151-8. PubMed 6825326 ↗
  • McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Dec;(261):159-70. PubMed 2245542 ↗
  • Robinson RP, Simonian PT, Gradisar IM, Ching RP. Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jan;79(1):140-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.6842. PubMed 9020463 ↗
  • Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):27-32. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00005. PubMed 12533568 ↗
  • Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Mar;444:184-92. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000201148.06454.ef. PubMed 16446589 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02204007
Lead sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 30, 2014
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Jan 2015
Completion
Jan 2015
Results posted
Mar 29, 2017
Last update
Mar 29, 2017

Study contacts

Carlos Higuera, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic
Alison Klika, MS
study director · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion