CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02202824Updated Dec 2, 2015

Measuring Beliefs and Norms About Violence Against Women

An interventional study of Survey questionnaire in Domestic Violence, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Uganda. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-02.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,557
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of our study was to determine the extent to which contextual information about the circumstances of intimate partner violence affects participants' responses to questions about their personal attitudes toward intimate partner violence.

Read the detailed description

In national studies conducted throughout sub-Saharan Africa, survey data indicate that there is widespread acceptance of intimate partner violence by both men and women (Alio et al., 2011, Mann \& Takyi, 2009, Rani et al., 2004, Uthman et al., 2009). For women, the proximate context of gender-unequal norms has important public health impacts. Men who report beliefs consistent with gender-unequal norms are more likely to be perpetrators of sexual violence (Shannon et al., 2012). Women are more likely to be victimized when they and their partners report concordant beliefs about the acceptability of intimate partner violence (Alio et al., 2011). And finally, women who live in areas characterized by gender-unequal norms about intimate partner violence are at greater risk for having their reproductive health compromised (Hung et al., 2012, Tsai \& Subramanian, 2012). Accurate measurement of norms about intimate partner violence therefore has important implications for understanding the health risk environment for women.

The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), which are nationally representative surveys conducted worldwide, have served as an important source of information on norms about intimate partner violence. However, a cross-country analysis of DHS data showed that minor deviations in survey wording may account for substantial cross-country variation in the extent to which women provide survey responses consistent with acceptance of intimate partner violence (Yount et al., 2011). Furthermore, in-depth interviews conducted among Bangladeshi women suggest that affirmative responses to DHS-style questions may better reflect their perceptions of prevailing norms or their individualized assumptions about contextual details rather than true beliefs about their acceptance of intimate partner violence (Schuler \& Islam, 2008, Schuler et al., 2011). Taken together, these lines of inquiry suggest important limitations in the accuracy with which the DHS measure women's attitudes towards intimate partner violence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Domestic Violence
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years and older
  • Emancipated minors aged 16-18 years
  • Considers Nyakabare Parish their primary place of residence
  • Capable of providing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minors younger than 18 years, with the exception of emancipated minors
  • Does not consider Nyakabare Parish their primary place of residence
  • Unable to communicate with research staff, e.g., due to deafness, mutism, or aphasia
  • Persons with psychosis, neurological damage, acute intoxication, or an intelligence quotient less than 70, as determined in the field by non-clinical research staff in consultation with a supervisor
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,557 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Survey questionnaire version 1

    Study participants will receive version 1 of the survey questionnaire

    Other: Survey questionnaire

  • Experimental
    Survey questionnaire version 2

    Study participants will receive version 2 of the survey questionnaire

    Other: Survey questionnaire

  • Experimental
    Survey questionnaire version 3

    Study participants will receive version 3 of the survey questionnaire

    Other: Survey questionnaire

Interventions

  • OtherSurvey questionnaire

    Each of the scale versions elicits personal attitudes toward intimate partner violence and perceived norms about intimate partner violence, in a different fashion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Personal attitudes toward intimate partner violence (5-item scale)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Perceived norms about intimate partner violence (5-item scale)

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mbarara University of Science and Technology
    Mbarara, Uganda
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tsai AC, Kakuhikire B, Perkins JM, Vorechovska D, McDonough AQ, Ogburn EL, Downey JM, Bangsberg DR. Measuring personal beliefs and perceived norms about intimate partner violence: Population-based survey experiment in rural Uganda. PLoS Med. 2017 May 23;14(5):e1002303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002303. eCollection 2017 May. PubMed 28542176 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02202824
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Responsible party
Alexander Tsai (Assistant in Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 29, 2014
Start date
Jul 2014
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Last update
Dec 2, 2015

Study contacts

Alexander C Tsai, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital
Bernard Kaukhikire, MBA
principal investigator · Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion