CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02185755Updated Sep 21, 2023

Internet Monitoring vs Medication to Control Blood Sugar in Type 2 Diabetes

An interventional study of Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System and Normal Medication Positive Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Endocrine Research Society. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-21.

Sponsored by Endocrine Research Society · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Managing blood sugar levels is important for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to minimize health problems and complications. One way for patients to notify doctors and receive feedback about their blood sugar management is through an online system. As Internet-based glucose monitoring systems (IBGMS) have already been shown to be effective, the investigators hypothesize that IBGMS is effective as an intervention even when limiting feedback to non-medicine related changes.

Read the detailed description
  1. Purpose:

    To determine the effectiveness of an Internet-based glucose monitoring system (IBGMS) in the absence of medication changes.

  2. Hypothesis:

    IBGMS without medication changes is comparable to conventional medication at reducing HbA1c levels over 8% in patients with T2DM.

  3. Justification:

    Patients with T2DM having elevated HbA1c levels may be prescribed additional medications to help manage their blood sugar levels, which include oral hypoglycemic agents and/or insulin. As IBGMS has been shown to be effective in reducing HbA1c in T2DM, there is an opportunity to determine whether if this system could be used as an alternative to medication.

    The benefits would include reduced side effects as a result of substituting for the effects of medication, as well as reduced financial costs associated with acquiring medication.

    Considering that IBGMS increases the frequency at which patients receive feedback to change medications as compared to typical treatment, the risk is as typical for a patient opting for no medication changes for the same period of time.

  4. Objectives: The primary end-point is to determine if patients using IBGMS have reduced HbA1c values at followup, and to compare the reduction to the control group on typical medications.
  5. Research Method: 120 patients with T2DM satisfying the inclusion criteria will be recruited and have baseline HbA1c established through regular lab blood tests. They will be randomized into one of two groups, one that will be trained to use IBGMS and one control group going on an appropriate additional medication.

    The IBGMS group will be asked to report their blood sugars to their endocrinologist biweekly and receive feedback for each report. No medication changes will be offered in the feedback, but lifestyle or dietary recommendations may be included.

    The control group will be asked to take their new medications as indicated by their endocrinologist.

    Both groups will have followup visits with their endocrinologist at 3 and 6 months, and will also have blood tests done at those time points checking their HbA1c levels.

    The effectiveness of both interventions will be evaluated individually and against each other.

    For the IBGMS group, a rescue secondary endpoint occurs if a subject maintains an HbA1c level at or greater than 8% after 3 months; the subject will be withdrawn from the study and put under standard care.

  6. Statistical Analysis: The sample size was calculated to be 120 by estimating mean differences and standard deviations using data from previous studies. For the calculation the statistical power was 0.80 and alpha of 0.05.
02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System
  • Type 2 Diabetes
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Endocrine Research Society is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Type 2 diabetes patients being treated with oral hypoglycemic agents
  • HbA1c > 8%
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be trained on using the Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet access on a computer
  • No prior use or training on IBGMS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with medical conditions that may affect their study participation or results will be excluded.
  • Patients using medications known to influence control of diabetes (eg steroids systemic or inhaled)
  • Liver disease (AST (aspartate aminotransferase) or ALT (alanine aminotransferase) levels > 2.5 times the reference level)
  • Renal insufficient with a serum creatinine level > 200 μmol/L
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System

    The subjects enrolled in the Internet Therapeutic Intervention arm receive standard care by testing their blood glucose at least 3 times daily and visit the endocrinologist every 3 months; however, they are also asked to upload their blood glucose readings online every 2 weeks for the health practitioner to view and provide feedback limited to non-medicine related comments and suggestions.

    Other: Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System

  • Other
    Normal Medication Positive Control

    The subjects will be prescribed a new medication as appropriate for normal therapy. This group will receive no biweekly feedback nor require to report online, but will see the endocrinologist every 3 months up to 6 months.

    Drug: Normal Medication Positive Control

Interventions

  • OtherInternet-Based Glucose Monitoring System

    Also known as: Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring System, Remote Blood Glucose Monitoring System

  • DrugNormal Medication Positive Control
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HbA1c Levels before and after intervention

    Compare HbA1c Levels before and after intervention for both arms, as well as the difference in HbA1c Levels between arms.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The secondary endpoint include severe hypoglycemia defined as requiring external aid (hospital or other).

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. A secondary endpoint includes adverse events such as unplanned hospitalizations for any cause that last more than 24 hours

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. HbA1c levels remain at 8% or higher

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dr. Hugh Tildesley Inc.
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6E1M7, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, Genuth SM, Lachin JM, Orchard TJ, Raskin P, Zinman B; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2643-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052187. PubMed 16371630 ↗
  • Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53. Erratum In: Lancet 1999 Aug 14;354(9178):602. PubMed 9742976 ↗
  • Hirsch IB, Bode BW, Childs BP, Close KL, Fisher WA, Gavin JR, Ginsberg BH, Raine CH, Verderese CA. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in insulin- and non-insulin-using adults with diabetes: consensus recommendations for improving SMBG accuracy, utilization, and research. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Dec;10(6):419-39. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0104. PubMed 18937550 ↗
  • Austin MM, Haas L, Johnson T, Parkin CG, Parkin CL, Spollett G, Volpone MT. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: benefits and utilization. Diabetes Educ. 2006 Nov-Dec;32(6):835-6, 844-7. doi: 10.1177/0145721706295873. No abstract available. PubMed 17102152 ↗
  • Tildesley HD, Mazanderani AB, Ross SA. Effect of Internet therapeutic intervention on A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1738-40. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2256. PubMed 20668152 ↗
  • Cho JH, Chang SA, Kwon HS, Choi YH, Ko SH, Moon SD, Yoo SJ, Song KH, Son HS, Kim HS, Lee WC, Cha BY, Son HY, Yoon KH. Long-term effect of the Internet-based glucose monitoring system on HbA1c reduction and glucose stability: a 30-month follow-up study for diabetes management with a ubiquitous medical care system. Diabetes Care. 2006 Dec;29(12):2625-31. doi: 10.2337/dc05-2371. PubMed 17130195 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02185755
Lead sponsor
Endocrine Research Society
Responsible party
ERS Gap Student (Medical Director, Endocrine Research Society) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2014
Start date
Aug 2014
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Aug 2016
Last update
Sep 21, 2023

Study contacts

Hugh D Tildesley, MD
principal investigator · Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion