An interventional study of 12-week instructor-led Tai Chi training program and 12-week instructor-led brisk walking training program in Physical Activity, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 36 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-08-20.
Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) accounted for major mortality and morbidity rates in Hong Kong (HK) other than cancer. Increasing energy expenditure through regular exercise participation has been found to lower the risk of CVD such as hyperlipidemia and obesity. Healthcare professionals often prescribe lifestyle exercises for disease prevention, rehabilitation, and health maintenance purposes. Previous study revealed that Tai Chi and walking were widely practice by HK citizens. However, limited studies are found to compare the health benefits between Tai Chi and walking. Do Tai Chi and walking have equally effective in raising metabolic rate and reducing CVD risks? The difference in energy cost between a single bout of Tai Chi and walking has not been documented. Limited studies report the effects of Tai Chi in lowering the CVD risk. Since walking and Tai Chi are being heavily promoted in HK in recent years, there is an urgent need to document the evidence of these two common forms of exercise in terms of reducing CVD risks. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the energy costs as well as CV health benefits, in terms of aerobic fitness, body composition, blood pressure, and blood lipid profiles, from the walking and Tai Chi exercise in a sample of HK Chinese adults, and to compare the effects between these two exercises. The investigators hypothesized that Tai Chi and walking had similar effects on improving energy cost and reducing CVD risks.
An influential medical report released in 1996 confirmed that daily accumulation of 30 minutes of moderate physical activity would significantly lower the risks of many chronic diseases (Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. 1996). The report also recommended walking as one of the best forms of exercise that suitable for both healthy and patient population in all ages. To meet the daily 30 minutes exercise guidelines, a popular health promotion campaign -- 10,000 steps of walking per day, has been widely implemented in western countries, and has been recently promoted by the Health Info-World of HK Hospital Authority. Some studies demonstrated various health benefits from regular walking. The most recent study by Murphy et al. (Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002) provided an excellent example that, in a 6-week walking program (5 days per week), one single bout of continuous 30 minutes of walking per day yielded similar health benefits as three 10-minute walks per day. The exercise intensity for both walking exercises was 70-80% of maximal heart rate, and resulted in significant increase in HDL-cholesterol, and decreases in triglycerides and total cholesterol. Both walking exercises improved body composition significantly. Moreover, tension/anxiety were also decreases significantly. Similar health benefits were also noted by several other studies (Moreau KL, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001. Wullink M et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001. O'Hara RB et al. ACSM's Health Fitness J 2000). In these studies, the walking intervention periods varied from 6 weeks to 24 weeks, and daily walking times varied from 20 minutes to 50 minutes. Exercise intensities varied from 50% to 70% of VO2max. However, the energy cost of a typical walking bout of HK adults is not clear. Since body composition of HK Chinese is different from those reported for westerners, it is reasonably believe that the energy expenditure of walking for HK Chinese is different from those found in the literature. The CVD benefits result from walking have not been reported for the Chinese population. These outcome measures derived from walking and Tai Chi have not been compared.
Tai Chi is an ancient form of Chinese fitness exercise. A number of studies have investigated the positive health improvement effects from Tai Chi for patients (Channer KS et al. Postgrad Med J 1996. Fontana JA et al. Nurs Clin North Am 2000. Lan C et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999), as well as for healthy individuals (Lan C et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998. Zhuo D et al. Can J Appl sport Sci 1984). These health benefits include an improvement of aerobic fitness (Lai JS et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995. Hong YL et al. Br J Sport Med 2000) and energy metabolism (Zhuo D et al. Can J Appl sport Sci 1984. Schneider D et al. Int J Sport Med 1991), muscular strength and balance (Hong YL et al. Br J Sport Med 2000. Chan WW et al. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2000. Schaller KJ et al. J Gerontol Nurs 1996), as well as mental control (Jin P. J Psycho-som Res 1992. Fasko Jr D et al. Clin Kinesiol 2001). Compared to walking, it is intuitively perceived that Tai Chi is characterized by lower exercise intensity and metabolic cost. But surprisingly, Lan et al. reported that the exercise intensity of a typical session of Tai Chi (24 minutes Yang style) exceeded 70% of maximal heart rate (Lan C et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996). However, the energy cost of this single bout of Tai Chi has not been investigated. Tai Chi and walking seem to provide similar benefits but has not been compared simultaneously except in one study. Jin reported that heart rate, blood pressure, and urinary catecholamine changes for Tai Chi were similar to walking at a speed of 6 km/h (Jin P. J Psycho-som Res 1992). However, the energy cost and CVD risk measures were not investigated in this study. Although both walking and Tai Chi are believe to have positive health benefits, the extents to which these exercises contribute to raising the energy metabolism as well as CV health improvement have not been documented. Which form of exercise would elicit higher energy demand and produce greater CV health effects? Currently no scientific data available to report such results for HK Chinese. Results from this study will be valuable for practitioners to provide quantifiable prescriptions for obese individuals for weight control, as well as for those who need to improve CV health.
AIMS
Increasing energy expenditure has been considered a crucial role for reducing obesity. Raising the level of energy expenditure has also been found to produce improvement in cardio-respiratory fitness and lowering CVD risks. However, the energy cost from Tai Chi and walking have not been fully studied and their training effects on CVD risks have not been compared. The purpose of the present study was to examine the level of energy expenditure of Tai Chi and walking, and to compare the training effects from Tai Chi and walking in terms of lowering CVD risks. Specific aims of the project were as follows:
Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 487 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants in this group received a 12-week instructor-led Tai Chi training program.
Behavioral: 12-week instructor-led Tai Chi training program
Participants in this group received a 12-week instructor-led brisk walking training program.
Behavioral: 12-week instructor-led brisk walking training program
Participants in the control group did not receive intervention during the 12 weeks, and were told that they would be provided two sessions of free health and fitness evaluation with an interval of three months (12 weeks).
A 12-week (45 min per day, 5 days per week) instructor-led Tai Chi training program was conducted in the Tai Chi group. Of the 5 days of exercise, 3 days were led by qualified instructors, and 2 other days for self-practice. Each session consisted of a 10-min standard warm-up, 30-min of Tai Chi exercise, and 5-min cool down stretching. The modified 32 Yang-style Tai Chi Chuan was used, because it could be learned within a relatively short time, and has been widely promoted in HK community. An exercise log was used to record the actual implementation of the training (instructor-led \& self-practice).
A 12-week (45 min per day, 5 days per week) instructor-led brisk walking training program was conducted in the walking group. Of the 5 days of exercise, 3 days were led by qualified instructors, and 2 other days for self-practice. Each session consisted of a 10-min standard warm-up, 30-min of walking exercise, and 5-min cool down stretching. An exercise log was used to record the actual implementation of the training (instructor-led \& self-practice).
Changes of aerobic fitness after intervention
The aerobic fitness, in terms of maximal oxygen intake (VO2max in ml/min/kg), was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The pre-intervention VO2max minus the post-intervention VO2max was the "Changes of aerobic fitness after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of resting VO2 (ml/min/kg) after intervention
Resting VO2 (ml/min/kg) was an indicator of resting energy expenditure (REE) in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The pre-intervention REE-VO2 minus the post-intervention REE-VO2 was the "Changes of resting VO2 after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of body mass index (BMI) after intervention
BMI was an indicator of body composition in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The pre-intervention BMI minus the post-intervention BMI was the "Changes of BMI after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of waist circumference (WC) after intervention
WC was an indicator of body composition in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The pre-intervention WC minus the post-intervention WC was the "Changes of WC after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of resting heart rate (HR in beats/min) after intervention
Resting heart rate (HR in beats/min) was an indicator of resting energy expenditure (REE) in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The pre-intervention REE-HR minus the post-intervention REE-HR was the "Changes of resting HR after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of resting kilocalorie expenditure (KCal in KCal/min) after intervention
Resting KCal (KCal/min) was an indicator of resting energy expenditure (REE) in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The pre-intervention REE-KCal minus the post-intervention REE-KCal was the "Changes of resting Kilocalorie expenditure after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of hip circumference (HC) after intervention
HC was an indicator of body composition in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The pre-intervention HC minus the post-intervention HC was the "Changes of HC after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of waist hip ratio (WHR) after intervention
WHR was an indicator of body composition in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The pre-intervention WHR minus the post-intervention WHR was the "Changes of WHR after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of body fat percentage after intervention
Body fat percentage was an indicator of body composition in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention body fat percentage minus the pre-intervention body fat percentage was the "Changes of body fat percentage after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of skinfold thickness after intervention
Skinfold thickness was an indicator of body composition in our study. The sum of skinfold thickness was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention body fat percentage minus the pre-intervention body fat percentage was the "Changes of skinfold thickness after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of SF-12 score after intervention
SF-12 score was an indicator of self-perceived health in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention SF-12 score minus the pre-intervention SF-12 score was the "Changes of SF-12 score after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of blood pressure (BP) after intervention
Blood pressure was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention BP minus the pre-intervention BP was the "Changes of BP after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) after intervention
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention fasting blood glucose minus the pre-intervention fasting blood glucose was the "Changes of fasting blood glucose after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of total cholesterol (mmol/L) after intervention
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention total cholesterol minus the pre-intervention total cholesterol was the "Changes of total cholesterol after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of high-density lipoprotein (HDL in mmol/L) after intervention
High-density lipoprotein (HDL in mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention HDL minus the pre-intervention HDL was the "Changes of HDL after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of Low-density lipoprotein (LDL in mmol/L) after intervention
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL in mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention LDL minus the pre-intervention LDL was the "Changes of LDL after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of triglycerides (mmol/L) after intervention
Triglycerides (mmol/L) was an indicator of cardiovascular health in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention triglycerides minus the pre-intervention triglycerides was the "Changes of triglycerides after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of dietary habits after intervention
Dietary habits was measured by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The differences of two measurements were analyzed.
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of handgrip (kg) after intervention
Handgrip (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention handgrip minus the pre-intervention handgrip was the "Changes of handgrip after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of arm lift (kg) after intervention
Arm lift (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention arm lift minus the pre-intervention arm lift was the "Changes of arm lift after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of shoulder lift (kg) after intervention
Shoulder lift (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention shoulder lift minus the pre-intervention shoulder lift was the "Changes of shoulder lift after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of leg lift (kg) after intervention
Leg lift (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention leg lift minus the pre-intervention leg lift was the "Changes of leg lift after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of back lift (kg) after intervention
Back lift (kg) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention back lift minus the pre-intervention back lift was the "Changes of back lift after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of balance test (sec) after intervention
Balance test (sec) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention balance test minus the pre-intervention balance test was the "Changes of balance test (sec) after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of curl-up test (reps) after intervention
Curl-up test (reps) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention curl-up test (reps) minus the pre-intervention curl-up test (reps) was the "Changes of curl-up test (reps) after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Changes of sit-and-reach (leg, cm) after intervention
Sit-and-reach (leg, cm) was an indicator of physical fitness in our study. It was measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3 months (post-intervention), respectively. The post-intervention sit-and-reach (leg, cm) minus the pre-intervention sit-and-reach (leg, cm) was the "Changes of sit-and-reach (leg, cm) after intervention"
Time frame: Measures were done at two time points: baseline and 3 months
Six-month maintenance
To evaluate the adherence of the Tai Chi and walking exercise training, a questionnaire was administered at 6-month upon the completion of the training sessions to evaluate the maintenance situation of the participants.
Time frame: 6-month after the completion of the training sessions
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Chinese University of Hong Kong