CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02160288Updated May 12, 2020Results posted

Effects of Botox in Obstructed Defecation Syndrome

A Phase 2 interventional study of Botulinum Toxin-A and Normal Saline in Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS), sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-12.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Low recruitment
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if Botulinum Toxin-A (Botox) injection will improve symptoms of constipation in obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS).

Read the detailed description

Constipation represents one of the five most common physician diagnoses for gut disorders. Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is an under-treated condition which accounts for 30%- 50% of all patients with constipation and it is more common as people age. ODS is due to the abnormal contraction of the puborectalis muscle (a muscle around the anus that should relax during defecation).

Biofeedback therapy and medical management are the standards of care for ODS. Typically patients are first managed with dietary modifications (fiber supplementation, increased fluids) and medication (laxatives, enemas). If constipation is not improved, they will undergo biofeedback, which lasts from 3-8 sessions on average. Biofeedback acts on the cause of ODS and it has good short-term success, but around 50%-70% of treated patients re-experience constipation after one year. The main drawbacks of biofeedback for ODS are the facts that it is expensive, time-consuming, available in few select-centers and its success depends very much on the provider. Biofeedback is delivered in multiple 1-hour clinic sessions, so many patients don't finish all recommended sessions and their constipation may recur faster.

Botox also acts on the cause of ODS and was shown to improve constipation within 1-3 weeks after the injection. Botox is delivered as a one-time injection in the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter (the muscle right around the anus). The injection can be performed in the clinic under local anesthesia, and the patient goes home afterwards. Currently, Botox is used for treatment of patients who fail biofeedback and medical management, to avoid the options of last resort (resection of the colon with stoma). To this day, no adequately designed study has confirmed that Botox is indeed superior to placebo (normal saline) for the treatment of ODS. The results from this study will provide valuable data on the ability of Botox to improve symptoms of constipation and the duration of its effect. This project has the potential to increase the availability of effective treatments for ODS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Botox
  • Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
  • ODS
  • Outlet-Type Constipation
  • injection
03

In context

Syndrome

9,217 studies on the registry are indexed under Syndrome; 1,034 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 50 across 6,517 interventional studies indexed under Syndrome.

Browse Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females 18 years or older of all races and backgrounds
  • Competent to give informed consent
  • Meet the Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional constipation
  • Inability to relax the puborectalis muscle at electromyography
  • Altomare Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score of 15 points or above
  • Failure of treatment with 2 conservative measures which may be as follows:

    • 1 laxative (osmotic or stimulant) for 2 weeks
    • 1 fiber supplement for one month
    • And/or trial of biofeedback for at least 4 sessions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment with Botox (possible antibodies)
  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the toxin
  • Medication regimen includes narcotics
  • Previous radiation therapy to the anal canal and rectum
  • Prior proctectomy
  • Presence of unhealed and symptomatic anal fissure
  • Presence of anal pain
  • Presence of fecal incontinence
  • Presence of full thickness rectal prolapse
  • Presence of internal sphincter myopathy
  • Inflammatory bowel disease or proctitis
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Subject is currently enrolled/ just finished participating in a clinical trial in which the intervention/ its carry-over effect may interact with the intervention in this trial
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Botulinum Toxin-A

    Patients will receive Botulinum Toxin-A (Botox) injected in the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter. We will use 100 units of Botox, a dose with a good safety profile that has been proven to work in previous studies performed in adults.

    Drug: Botulinum Toxin-A

  • Placebo comparator
    Normal saline

    Patients will receive normal saline (placebo) injected in the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter.

    Drug: Normal Saline

Interventions

  • DrugBotulinum Toxin-A

    100 Units diluted in a 5 cc syringe at a concentration of 20U/mL

    Also known as: Botox

  • DrugNormal Saline

    Dispensed in a 5 cc syringe

    Also known as: 0.9% Sodium Chloride

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in the Altomare Obstructed Defecation Syndrome- Score (ODS-S) and Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL)

    The primary outcome measure will be the change from baseline in the sum of ODS-S and PAC-QoL at 1 month after the Botox injection. This measures the symptomatic improvement in ODS. ODS (altomare obstructed defecation syndrome score) scores range from 0 (minimum) to 31 (maximum) where 31 is the most severe (worse outcome) and 0 is no symptoms (better outcome). The scale for PAC-QoL (Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of life score) is a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 112 where 0 is highest quality of life (better outcome) and 112 is lowest quality of life (worse outcome) Larger number for change would suggest a better outcome

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in the Altomare ODS Score (ODS-S)

    The scale title is obstructed defecation score, the minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 31 for the ODS score. This measures the symptomatic improvement in ODS. ODS scores range from 0-31 where 31 is the most severe and 0 is no symptoms. A higher score would suggest a better outcome.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months

  2. Changes in the Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL)

    PAC-QoL is Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score. The scale for PAC-QoL is 0 minimum score to 112 maximum score where 0 is highest quality of life (better outcome) and 112 is lowest quality of life (worse outcome). Since we are looking for a change in score, the minimum change would be 0 and the maximum change would be 112. A higher change would suggest a better outcome.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months

  3. Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life

    Medical outcomes survey short form (SF-36 version 1) will be used to measure changes in the health-related quality of life.This is a measure of efficacy. The score ranges from 0-100 where 0 is maximum impact on health and 100 is no impact on health

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months

  4. Changes in Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFI)

    This is a measure of Botox-specific adverse events. The score is a total of answers of questions. The score range is 0-20 where 0 is perfect incontinence and 20 is complete incontinence.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months

  5. Changes in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQoL)

    This is a measure of Botox-specific adverse events. This fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQoL) scale ranges from 4 as the minimum and 20 as maximum. lower score indicates lower quality of life (worse outcome) and higher score has better quality of life (better outcome).

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months

  6. Relaxation of Puborectalis With Push Measured by EMG

    This is a measure of efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month follow-up visit

  7. Success of Balloon Expulsion Test

    This is a measure of efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month follow-up visit

  8. Change in Anal Sphincter Function

    The changes in anal sphincter function will be assessed by anorectal manometry. This test will measure the resting sphincter pressure, maximal resting anal pressure, maximum squeeze pressure. The change in anal sphincter function is a measure of treatment efficacy. The minimum score for resting sphincter pressure is 0 and the maximum is 200. The minimum squeeze pressure is 10 and the maximum is 200. The lower score is suggested of decreased tone and worse outcome, where high scores may suggest worse outcome in terms of sphincter function.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month follow-up visit

  9. Change in Defecation Index

    The defecation index=maximum rectal pressure during attempted defecation/minimum anal residual pressure during attempted defecation. This is calculated based on measurements obtained from anorectal manometry and is a measure of treatment efficacy. Scores can change from 0 (meaning no change- least effective) to 1 meaning that the change shows complete relaxation with defecation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month follow-up visit

07

Results

Posted May 12, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Started10
Completed10
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanges in the Altomare Obstructed Defecation Syndrome- Score (ODS-S) and Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL)

The primary outcome measure will be the change from baseline in the sum of ODS-S and PAC-QoL at 1 month after the Botox injection. This measures the symptomatic improvement in ODS. ODS (altomare obstructed defecation syndrome score) scores range from 0 (minimum) to 31 (maximum) where 31 is the most severe (worse outcome) and 0 is no symptoms (better outcome). The scale for PAC-QoL (Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of life score) is a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 112 where 0 is highest quality of life (better outcome) and 112 is lowest quality of life (worse outcome) Larger number for change would suggest a better outcome

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month after injection
Reported as:
Number · change in score on a scale
Changes in the Altomare Obstructed Defecation Syndrome- Score (ODS-S) and Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL)
change in score on a scaleBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Changes in the Altomare Obstructed Defecation Syndrome- Score (ODS-S) and Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL)3—
SecondaryChanges in the Altomare ODS Score (ODS-S)

The scale title is obstructed defecation score, the minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 31 for the ODS score. This measures the symptomatic improvement in ODS. ODS scores range from 0-31 where 31 is the most severe and 0 is no symptoms. A higher score would suggest a better outcome.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Number · score on a scale
Changes in the Altomare ODS Score (ODS-S)
score on a scaleBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Changes in the Altomare ODS Score (ODS-S)18—
SecondaryChanges in the Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL)

PAC-QoL is Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score. The scale for PAC-QoL is 0 minimum score to 112 maximum score where 0 is highest quality of life (better outcome) and 112 is lowest quality of life (worse outcome). Since we are looking for a change in score, the minimum change would be 0 and the maximum change would be 112. A higher change would suggest a better outcome.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Number · change in score on a scale
Changes in the Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL)
change in score on a scaleBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Changes in the Patient Assessment of Constipation- Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL)21—
SecondaryChanges in Health-Related Quality of Life

Medical outcomes survey short form (SF-36 version 1) will be used to measure changes in the health-related quality of life.This is a measure of efficacy. The score ranges from 0-100 where 0 is maximum impact on health and 100 is no impact on health

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Number · change in score on a scale
Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life
change in score on a scaleBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life1—
SecondaryChanges in Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFI)

This is a measure of Botox-specific adverse events. The score is a total of answers of questions. The score range is 0-20 where 0 is perfect incontinence and 20 is complete incontinence.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Number · change in score on a scale
Changes in Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFI)
change in score on a scaleBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Changes in Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFI)2—
SecondaryChanges in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQoL)

This is a measure of Botox-specific adverse events. This fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQoL) scale ranges from 4 as the minimum and 20 as maximum. lower score indicates lower quality of life (worse outcome) and higher score has better quality of life (better outcome).

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection and value compared from baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Number · change in score on a scale
Changes in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQoL)
change in score on a scaleBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Changes in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQoL)18—
SecondaryRelaxation of Puborectalis With Push Measured by EMG

This is a measure of efficacy.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month follow-up visit
Reported as:
Number · participants
Relaxation of Puborectalis With Push Measured by EMG
participantsBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Relaxation of Puborectalis With Push Measured by EMG0—
SecondarySuccess of Balloon Expulsion Test

This is a measure of efficacy.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month follow-up visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Success of Balloon Expulsion Test
ParticipantsBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Success of Balloon Expulsion Test1—
SecondaryChange in Anal Sphincter Function

The changes in anal sphincter function will be assessed by anorectal manometry. This test will measure the resting sphincter pressure, maximal resting anal pressure, maximum squeeze pressure. The change in anal sphincter function is a measure of treatment efficacy. The minimum score for resting sphincter pressure is 0 and the maximum is 200. The minimum squeeze pressure is 10 and the maximum is 200. The lower score is suggested of decreased tone and worse outcome, where high scores may suggest worse outcome in terms of sphincter function.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month follow-up visit
Reported as:
Number · change of score
Change in Anal Sphincter Function
change of scoreBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Change in Anal Sphincter Function56.3—
SecondaryChange in Defecation Index

The defecation index=maximum rectal pressure during attempted defecation/minimum anal residual pressure during attempted defecation. This is calculated based on measurements obtained from anorectal manometry and is a measure of treatment efficacy. Scores can change from 0 (meaning no change- least effective) to 1 meaning that the change shows complete relaxation with defecation.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month follow-up visit
Reported as:
Number · change in score on a scale
Change in Defecation Index
change in score on a scaleBotulinum Toxin-ANormal Saline
Change in Defecation Index0—

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Botulinum Toxin-A0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
Normal Saline———

Baseline characteristics

We were unable to recruit more than one patient to the study so it was closed

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Botulinum Toxin-ANormal SalineTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years101
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Botulinum Toxin-ANormal SalineTotal
Female000
Male101
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Botulinum Toxin-ANormal SalineTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Botulinum Toxin-ANormal SalineTotal
United States101
ODS score
ODS score(units on a scale)Botulinum Toxin-ANormal SalineTotal
Number20—20
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shaheen NJ, Hansen RA, Morgan DR, Gangarosa LM, Ringel Y, Thiny MT, Russo MW, Sandler RS. The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2128-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x. Epub 2006 Jul 18. PubMed 16848807 ↗
  • Suares NC, Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;106(9):1582-91; quiz 1581, 1592. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.164. Epub 2011 May 24. PubMed 21606976 ↗
  • American Gastroenterological Association; Bharucha AE, Dorn SD, Lembo A, Pressman A. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):211-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.029. No abstract available. PubMed 23261064 ↗
  • Maria G, Cadeddu F, Brandara F, Marniga G, Brisinda G. Experience with type A botulinum toxin for treatment of outlet-type constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov;101(11):2570-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00791.x. Epub 2006 Oct 4. PubMed 17029615 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 18, 2015
  • Informed consent form · Nov 28, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02160288
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Responsible party
Liliana Bordeianou (Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 10, 2014
Start date
Feb 2016
Primary completion
Jun 11, 2019
Completion
Jun 11, 2019
Results posted
May 12, 2020
Last update
May 12, 2020

Study contacts

Liliana Bordeianou, M.D.
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion