CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02154802Updated Jun 3, 2014

Increasing HIV Testing in Urban Emergency Departments Via Mobile Technology

An interventional study of video: community member and video: physician in HIV Testing, sponsored by National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-03.

Sponsored by National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. · Not applicable and Interventional

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2014), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Because people with undiagnosed HIV will not receive treatment and may unknowingly infect others, the investigators propose a mobile computer-based video intervention to increase HIV test rates in high volume urban hospital emergency departments (EDs). EDs offer important points of contact for many of those at greatest risk for HIV. Unfortunately, when ED patients are offered routine HIV testing, most decline. Our proposed intervention builds upon initial findings from a trial our research team conducted with patients who declined HIV testing. The intervention, grounded in the Information-Motivation and Behavioral Skills model (IMB), showed an onscreen physician explaining the importance of HIV testing (to build knowledge and motivation) and modeling a rapid HIV test (to increase motivation and behavioral skill). This brief intervention had a potent effect: a third accepted HIV testing post-intervention. While this preliminary study is highly encouraging, it revealed a number of other critical research questions. First, it remains unclear what intervention component most strongly contributed to patients' decisions to test: the video content or the offer of an HIV test by a computer rather than a person. Second, consistent with the literature, participants indicated a community member disclosing positive HIV status onscreen would increase the proportion of patients who test. Third, results suggest there is individual variation in the extent to which behavior is more strongly influenced by onscreen community members or experts (e.g. physicians). Therefore, the goal of the present study, guided by the IMB model, is to determine how the investigators can refine mobile computer-based interventions to maximize HIV testing rates among patients who initially decline to test in the ED. At the end of the computerized intervention, onscreen text will ask patients if they would agree to an HIV test. Those who agree will be tested by ED staff. The study's endpoint will be post-intervention HIV test rates. The investigators' study will inform scalable interventions for underserved populations nationwide.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Testing
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 or over
  • Capable of providing informed consent
  • Reads English
  • Declined HIV test offered by hospital staf at triage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • intoxicated
  • a prisoner
  • known to be HIV positive
  • presenting to the hospital for a psychiatric problem
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    video: community member

    Participant watches video of a community member

    Behavioral: video: community member

  • Experimental
    video: physician

    Participant watches video of a physician

    Behavioral: video: physician

  • Experimental
    video: choice of video

    Participant can choose to watch video of either the community member of the physician

    Behavioral: video: choice of video

  • No intervention
    no video

Interventions

  • Behavioralvideo: community member
  • Behavioralvideo: physician
  • Behavioralvideo: choice of video
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants who accept an HIV test after completing the intervention

    The intervention computers will show participants a set of videos and data collection instruments. When the participant has watched the video and responded to all instruments, the computers will ask patients if they would like an HIV test. Answers are yes or no.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knowledge change

    The intervention computers will display a set of HIV-related knowledge questions before and after a video segment. This will enable the investigators to examine potential increases in participants' knowledge after watching a video.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Luke's Emergency Department
    New York, New York 10025, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02154802
Lead sponsor
National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.
Responsible party
Ian Aronson (Principal Investigator, National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 3, 2014
Start date
Jul 2014
Primary completion
Jan 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 3, 2014

Study contacts

Ian D Aronson, Ph.D.
Contact
aronson@ndri.org
212-845-4567
Lisa Bernhard
Contact
bernhard@ndri.org
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion