ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT02147795Updated Mar 10, 2023

The German Patient Blood Management Network

An observational study in Clinical Safety of a PBM Program, sponsored by Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital. Recruiting at 2 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-10.

Sponsored by Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  • This epidemiological trial will determine whether the implementation of a PBM program is safe and effective in terms of clinical outcome compared to a pre-implementation cohort
  • Primary endpoint is a composite outcome comprising in-hospital myocardial infarction, stroke, acute renal failure, death of any cause, pneumonia and sepsis until discharge from hospital in patients before and after implementation of the PBM program.
  • Secondary endpoints are the length of stay on the intensive care unit, total hospital stay and the quantitative utilization of allogeneic RBC units, platelet concentrates, other blood products (e.g. fresh frozen (therapeutic) plasma), coagulations factors, and cell saver systems during hospital stay.
  • The primary aim is to prove non-inferiority of the intervention (PBM) group when compared with the control group stratified by center.
Read the detailed description

Background: The transfusion of allogeneic red blood cell units might be associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to infectious, immunological, pulmonary and thromboembolic complications. However, transfusion practice currently varies significantly between hospitals and even between physicians and Patient Blood Management programs have not been implemented nationwide in Germany yet. Patient Blood Management (PBM) concepts aim to identify and optimize patients at risk of allogeneic blood transfusions, to promote blood-sparing techniques and restrictive transfusion practices. A rational use of red blood cell concentrates and safe clinical transfusion practice is mandatory. The purpose of the German PBM network is to evaluate the safety of a standardized, evidence-based Patient Blood management concept.

Study Design and Methods: This epidemiological study is a follow-up of a study that is already being carried out in four German university hospitals. This new prospective, multi-centre trial comprises approximately 20 different hospitals of varying size and levels of patient care. A patient-centred, evidence-based Patient Blood Management program will be enrolled in each of these hospitals reforming the care of adult patients undergoing any type of surgery. This PBM program includes the following three main pillars: 1) preoperative optimization of hemoglobin levels in high-risk patients with anaemia, 2) standardization of transfusion practice and transfusion triggers according to evidence-based guidelines and 3) alternatives to transfusion of allogeneic RBC concentrates and blood-sparing techniques (like routine use of cell saver systems, point-of-care diagnostics, optimized coagulation management, restrictive blood sampling).

02

Conditions studied

  • Clinical Safety of a PBM Program

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Patient Blood Management
  • Red Blood Cell Transfusion Practice
  • Patient Safety
  • Anemia
  • Clinical Outcome
  • perioperative care
03

In context

Anemia

1,810 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia; 215 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000,000 is above the median of 270 across 368 observational studies indexed under Anemia.

Browse Anemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 160 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult surgical patients

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • all surgeries with a general or local anaesthetic
  • minimum hospital stay of 24 h
  • ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \< 18 years
  • ophthalmologic or dermatologic or outpatient surgery
  • all non-surgical anesthetic procedures
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Control cohort

    Standard care before implementation (pre-implementation)

  • PBM cohort

    After implementation of PBM program (post-implementation)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Outcome for and after PBM program

    composite outcome comprising in-hospital myocardial infarction, stroke, acute renal failure, death of any cause, pneumonia and sepsis until discharge from hospital in patients before and after implementation of the PBM program

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of stay

    length of stay on the intensive care unit, total hospital stay

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

  2. haemotherapy

    the quantitative utilization of allogeneic RBC units, platelet concentrates, other blood products (e.g. fresh frozen (therapeutic) plasma), coagulations factors, and any other haemotherapy (including use of cell salvage

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schmitt E, Meybohm P, Neef V, Baumgarten P, Bayer A, Choorapoikayil S, Friederich P, Friedrich J, Geisen C, Guresir E, Grunewald M, Gutjahr M, Helmer P, Herrmann E, Muller M, Narita D, Raadts A, Schwendner K, Seifried E, Stark P, Steinbicker AU, Thoma J, Velten M, Weigt H, Wiesenack C, Wittmann M, Zacharowski K, Piekarski F; German PBM Network Collaborators. Preoperative anaemia and red blood cell transfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage - a multicentre subanalysis of the German PBM Network Registry. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Apr;164(4):985-999. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05144-7. Epub 2022 Feb 26. PubMed 35220460 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02147795
Responsible party
Professor Kai Zacharowski, M.D., Ph.D., FRCA (Professor Kai Zacharowski, M.D., Ph.D., FRCA, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 28, 2014
Start date
Jan 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 10, 2023

Study contacts

Kai D Zacharowski, Prof, MD, PhD
Contact
Direktion.Anaesthesie@kgu.de
0049 69 6301 ext. 5998
Patrick Meybohm, M.D
Contact
patientbloodmanagement@kgu.de
0049 6906301 ext. 5998

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion