CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02138175Updated Apr 25, 2022

Continuous Hemoglobin Monitoring: Detection of Acute Blood Loss - Accurate, Timely and Cost-effective

An observational study in Bleeding and Acute Blood Loss Anemia, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-25.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
Sponsor (Masimo) suspended trial due to change in corporate ownership
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring is sensitive and accurate enough to detect a significant downward trend in hemoglobin in patients at risk for significant bleeding. If this can be shown, it has the potential to spare patients multiple invasive blood draws as well as allow for earlier detection of significant blood loss and therefore positively impact on patient morbidity and mortality. Additionally, it may represent significant financial cost savings in that it may allow for patients to be monitored in a non-intensive care unit setting.

This will be an observational study. The continuous hemoglobin monitor will be connected to the patient and hemoglobin measurement data will be collected. Routine laboratory hemoglobin monitoring will occur concurrently at a pre-specified frequency as well as at the physician's discretion based on usual clinical information. The physician will be blinded to the continuous hemoglobin monitoring readings and therefore patient care will not be affected by the use of the monitor. Once the study has ended, the data will then be analyzed to assess for correlation between continuous hemoglobin monitoring readings and laboratory hemoglobin measurement.

Read the detailed description

No recruitment initiated

02

Conditions studied

  • Bleeding
  • Acute Blood Loss Anemia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • bleeding
  • blood loss
  • hemoglobin
  • hemoglobin monitoring
  • noninvasive monitoring
03

In context

Hemorrhage

3,000 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhage; 474 are open to participants now.

Browse Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,320 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 323 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 243 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult (>18 years) patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for hemodynamic monitoring and serial hemoglobin measurements at high risk for bleeding (known solid organ/vascular/orthopedic injury, unexplained hypotension/tachycardia following trauma/surgery, suspected ongoing blood loss-postoperative or gastrointestinal bleeding)

Inclusion criteria

  • > 18 years of age
  • admission to surgical intensive care unit
  • suspected or high risk for ongoing blood loss

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients at risk for bleeding

    Patients at risk for bleeding

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation of hemoglobin level measurement between continuous hemoglobin monitor and laboratory analysis

    Time frame: minimum of every 6 hours after intensive care unit admission, shorter intervals if determined indicated by physician based on clinical information, over an estimated period of 3 days, or until patient transferred out of intensive care unit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Carolinas Medical Center
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Frasca D, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Catherine K, Levrat Q, Debaene B, Mimoz O. Accuracy of a continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2277-82. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182227e2d. PubMed 21666449 ↗
  • Causey MW, Miller S, Foster A, Beekley A, Zenger D, Martin M. Validation of noninvasive hemoglobin measurements using the Masimo Radical-7 SpHb Station. Am J Surg. 2011 May;201(5):592-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.01.020. PubMed 21545905 ↗
  • Coquin J, Dewitte A, Manach YL, Caujolle M, Joannes-Boyau O, Fleureau C, Janvier G, Ouattara A. Precision of noninvasive hemoglobin-level measurement by pulse co-oximetry in patients admitted to intensive care units for severe gastrointestinal bleeds. Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2576-82. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318258fb4f. PubMed 22732278 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02138175
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2014
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2016 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 25, 2022

Study contacts

Toan Huynh, MD
principal investigator · Carolinas Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion