ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02125461PACIFICUpdated Oct 10, 2023Results posted

A Global Study to Assess the Effects of MEDI4736 Following Concurrent Chemoradiation in Patients With Stage III Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of MEDI4736 and PLACEBO in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 236 sites in 26 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 130 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-10.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
713
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 130 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Global Study to Assess the Effects of MEDI4736 following concurrent chemoradiation in Patients with Stage III Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Read the detailed description

A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-centre, International Study of MEDI4736 as Sequential Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced, Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Stage III) Who Have Not Progressed Following Definitive, Platinum-based, Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy (PACIFIC)

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • Locally advanced
  • Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • MEDI4736
  • PD-L1
  • Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Chemoradiation
  • Immune-mediated cancer therapy
03

In context

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

6,645 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,665 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 713 is above the median of 62 across 5,327 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.

Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,492 studies on the registry; 265 are open to participants now.

Of its 368 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 176 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 130 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age at least 18 years.
  2. Documented evidence of NSCLC (locally advanced, unresectable, Stage III)
  3. Patients must have received at least 2 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy.
  4. World Health Organisation (WHO) Performance Status of 0 to 1.
  5. Estimated life expectancy of more than 12 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior exposure to any anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibody.
  2. Active or prior autoimmune disease or history of immunodeficiency.
  3. Evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases, including active bleeding diatheses or active infections including hepatitis B, C and HIV.
  4. Evidence of uncontrolled illness such as symptomatic congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension or unstable angina pectoris.
  5. Any unresolved toxicity CTCAE >Grade 2 from the prior chemoradiation therapy.
  6. Active or prior documented inflammatory bowel disease (eg, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
713 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MEDI4736

    MEDI4736 (intravenous infusion)

    Drug: MEDI4736

  • Placebo comparator
    PLACEBO

    Placebo (matching placebo for intravenous infusion)

    Other: PLACEBO

Interventions

  • MEDI4736 by intravenous infusion. Treatment from Day 1 for a maximum of 12 months or study drug withdrawal if this occurs earlier . The 2:1 ratio (MEDI4736 to placebo).

  • OtherPLACEBO

    PLACEBO by intravenous infusion. Treatment from Day 1 for a maximum of 12 months or study drug withdrawal if this occurs earlier . The 2:1 ratio (MEDI4736 to placebo).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression (RECIST 1.1) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression). Progression was defined using RECIST 1.1 as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 13 Feb 2017 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 3 years.

  2. Overall Survival

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Time frame: From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on BICR Assesments According to RECIST 1.1

    ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with at least one visit response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; OR = CR + PR.

    Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.

  2. Duration of Response (DoR) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1

    DoR was defined as the time from date for first documented response of CR or PR until the first documented response of progression per RECIST 1.1 or death in the absence of progression. DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.

  3. Proportion of Patients Alive and Progression Free at 12 Months From (APF12) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1

    APF12 was defined as the percentage of patients who were alive and progression free per RECIST 1.1 at 12 months after randomization per Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS at 12 months.

    Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 13 Feb 2017 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 3 years.

  4. Proportion of Patients Alive and Progression Free at 18 Months From (APF18) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1

    APF18 was defined as the percentage of patients who were alive and progression free per RECIST 1.1 at 18 months after randomization per the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS at 18 months.

    Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 13 Feb 2017 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 3 years.

  5. Time to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1

    TTDM was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of distant metastasis or death in the absence of distant metastasis. Distant metastasis was defined as any new lesion that was outside of the radiation field according to RECIST 1.1 or proven by biopsy. TTDM was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.

  6. Percentage of Patients Alive at 24 Months (OS24)

    OS24 was defined as the percentage of patients who were alive at 24 months after randomization per the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months.

    Time frame: From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.

  7. Time to Second Progression or Death (PFS2)

    PFS2 was defined as the time from randomization to the time of the second progression or death. The date of second progression was recorded by the investigator and defined according to local standard clinical practice, and could have involved any of the following: objective radiological, symptomatic progression, or death. RECIST assessments were not collected for assessment of PFS2. PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Time frame: Following confirmed progression, patients were assessed every ~12 weeks until second disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.

  8. Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-Item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Global health status/HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 global QoL scale which includes 2 items from the QLQ-C30: "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and "How would you rate your overall QoL during the past week?" (Item 30). Scores from 0 to 100 were derived for each item with higher scores indicating a better health status. Time to deterioration for global health status/HRQoL was defined as time from randomization until the date of first clinically meaningful deterioration (a decrease in global health status/HRQoL from baseline of ≥10) or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration. Time to deterioration was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Time frame: At baseline, every 4 weeks for first 8 weeks, then every ~8 weeks until 48 weeks, then every ~12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.

  9. Time to Deterioration of Primary Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13)

    The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module from the EORTC comprising 13 questions to assess lung cancer symptoms (cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, and other pain), treatment related side-effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy and alopecia) and pain medication. Scores from 0 to 100 were derived for each symptom item with higher scores representing greater symptom severity. Time to symptom deterioration was defined as time from randomization until the date of first clinically meaningful symptom deterioration (an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10) or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful symptom deterioration. Results are presented for time to deterioration in the following PRO endpoints identified as primary for EORTC QLQ-LC13: dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis and chest pain. Time to deterioration was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Time frame: At baseline, every 4 weeks for first 8 weeks, then every ~8 weeks until 48 weeks, then every ~12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.

  10. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations

    To evaluate PK, blood samples were collected pre-dose and post-dose and trough and peak serum concentrations of durvalumab, respectively, were determined. Pre-dose samples were taken within 60 minutes before infusion and post-dose samples were taken within 10 minutes after the end of infusion.

    Time frame: Samples were collected pre-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 8, Week 24 and Week 48, and post-dose on Day 1 (Week 0) and Week 24. Analysis performed at 22 Mar 2018 DCO.

  11. Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab

    ADA positive post-baseline only was also referred to as treatment-induced ADA positive. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted by ≥4-fold following drug administration. Persistently positive was defined as positive at ≥2 post-baseline assessments (with ≥16 weeks between first and last positive) or positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as having at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of persistently positive. Confirmed ADA positive samples were subsequently tested in a neutralizing antibody assay.

    Time frame: Samples were collected pre-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 8, Week 24 and Week 48. Analysis performed at 22 Mar 2018 DCO.

07

Results

Posted Jan 30, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Results of interim PFS analysis are considered as final PFS analysis; results of interim OS analysis are considered as final OS analysis. Patients were followed up for long-term survival until approximately 5 years after last patient enrolled.

Participant flow

Patients were randomized between 09 May 2014 and 22 Apr 2016 in 235 study centers across 26 countries. Data cut-off (DCO) date for analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and PFS rates at 12 and 18 months: 13 Feb 2017; DCO date for analysis of overall survival (OS) and all other secondary outcome measures: 22 Mar 2018; DCO date for completion of long-term survival: 11 Jan 2021.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Started476237
Full analysis set (fas)476237
Received treatment473236
Safety analysis set475234
Completed 12 months of treatment23282
Completed17868
Not completed298169
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3016
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up83
Withdrew: Death260149
Withdrew: Missing termination reason01

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression Free Survival Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression (RECIST 1.1) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression). Progression was defined using RECIST 1.1 as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame:
Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 13 Feb 2017 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 3 years.
Reported as:
Median · Months
Progression Free Survival Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
MonthsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Progression Free Survival Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)16.8 (13.0 to 18.1)5.6 (4.6 to 7.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.52 · 95% CI 0.42 to 0.65
PrimaryOverall Survival

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame:
From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival
MonthsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Overall SurvivalNA (34.7 to NA)28.7 (22.9 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.00251 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.68 · 95% CI 0.53 to 0.87
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) Based on BICR Assesments According to RECIST 1.1

ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with at least one visit response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; OR = CR + PR.

Time frame:
Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on BICR Assesments According to RECIST 1.1
Percentage of patientsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on BICR Assesments According to RECIST 1.130.0 (25.79 to 34.53)17.8 (12.95 to 23.65)
Statistical analysis
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = <0.001
SecondaryDuration of Response (DoR) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1

DoR was defined as the time from date for first documented response of CR or PR until the first documented response of progression per RECIST 1.1 or death in the absence of progression. DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame:
Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response (DoR) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1
MonthsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Duration of Response (DoR) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1NA (27.4 to NA)18.4 (6.7 to 24.5)
SecondaryProportion of Patients Alive and Progression Free at 12 Months From (APF12) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1

APF12 was defined as the percentage of patients who were alive and progression free per RECIST 1.1 at 12 months after randomization per Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS at 12 months.

Time frame:
Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 13 Feb 2017 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 3 years.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Proportion of Patients Alive and Progression Free at 12 Months From (APF12) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1
Percentage of patientsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Proportion of Patients Alive and Progression Free at 12 Months From (APF12) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.155.9 (51.0 to 60.4)35.3 (29.0 to 41.7)
SecondaryProportion of Patients Alive and Progression Free at 18 Months From (APF18) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1

APF18 was defined as the percentage of patients who were alive and progression free per RECIST 1.1 at 18 months after randomization per the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS at 18 months.

Time frame:
Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 13 Feb 2017 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 3 years.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Proportion of Patients Alive and Progression Free at 18 Months From (APF18) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1
Percentage of patientsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Proportion of Patients Alive and Progression Free at 18 Months From (APF18) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.144.2 (37.7 to 50.5)27.0 (19.9 to 34.5)
SecondaryTime to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1

TTDM was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of distant metastasis or death in the absence of distant metastasis. Distant metastasis was defined as any new lesion that was outside of the radiation field according to RECIST 1.1 or proven by biopsy. TTDM was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame:
Tumor scans performed at baseline then every ~8 weeks up to 48 weeks, then every ~ 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.1
MonthsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Time to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM) Based on BICR Assessments According to RECIST 1.128.3 (24.0 to 34.9)16.2 (12.5 to 21.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.53 · 95% CI 0.41 to 0.68
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Alive at 24 Months (OS24)

OS24 was defined as the percentage of patients who were alive at 24 months after randomization per the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months.

Time frame:
From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Alive at 24 Months (OS24)
Percentage of patientsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Percentage of Patients Alive at 24 Months (OS24)66.3 (61.7 to 70.4)55.6 (48.9 to 61.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · z-test · p = 0.005 (P-value generated based on z-test where z-test statistic is the ratio of the log-transformed ratio of the cumulative hazards in the 2 treatment arms divided by the square root of the variance.)The variance was estimated using the delta method and Greenwood's formula.
SecondaryTime to Second Progression or Death (PFS2)

PFS2 was defined as the time from randomization to the time of the second progression or death. The date of second progression was recorded by the investigator and defined according to local standard clinical practice, and could have involved any of the following: objective radiological, symptomatic progression, or death. RECIST assessments were not collected for assessment of PFS2. PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame:
Following confirmed progression, patients were assessed every ~12 weeks until second disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Second Progression or Death (PFS2)
MonthsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Time to Second Progression or Death (PFS2)28.3 (25.1 to 34.7)17.1 (14.5 to 20.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.58 · 95% CI 0.46 to 0.73
SecondaryTime to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-Item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

Global health status/HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 global QoL scale which includes 2 items from the QLQ-C30: "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and "How would you rate your overall QoL during the past week?" (Item 30). Scores from 0 to 100 were derived for each item with higher scores indicating a better health status. Time to deterioration for global health status/HRQoL was defined as time from randomization until the date of first clinically meaningful deterioration (a decrease in global health status/HRQoL from baseline of ≥10) or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration. Time to deterioration was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame:
At baseline, every 4 weeks for first 8 weeks, then every ~8 weeks until 48 weeks, then every ~12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-Item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
MonthsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-Item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)7.4 (5.5 to 9.3)5.7 (4.2 to 10.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.664 (Analysis performed using a stratified log rank test adjusting for age at randomization (\<65 vs ≥65), sex (male vs female), and smoking history (smoker vs non-smoker) with ties handled using the Breslow approach.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.95 · 95% CI 0.77 to 1.18
SecondaryTime to Deterioration of Primary Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13)

The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module from the EORTC comprising 13 questions to assess lung cancer symptoms (cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, and other pain), treatment related side-effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy and alopecia) and pain medication. Scores from 0 to 100 were derived for each symptom item with higher scores representing greater symptom severity. Time to symptom deterioration was defined as time from randomization until the date of first clinically meaningful symptom deterioration (an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10) or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful symptom deterioration. Results are presented for time to deterioration in the following PRO endpoints identified as primary for EORTC QLQ-LC13: dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis and chest pain. Time to deterioration was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame:
At baseline, every 4 weeks for first 8 weeks, then every ~8 weeks until 48 weeks, then every ~12 weeks thereafter until confirmed disease progression. Assessed until 22 Mar 2018 DCO; up to a maximum of approximately 4 years.
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Deterioration of Primary Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13)
MonthsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
Dyspnea2.8 (1.9 to 3.7)3.7 (2.3 to 4.1)
Cough5.6 (4.5 to 7.3)5.6 (3.7 to 6.0)
HemoptysisNA (NA to NA)29.6 (21.2 to NA)
Chest pain11.1 (7.4 to 18.6)8.3 (5.6 to 13.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.522 (Analysis performed using a stratified log rank test adjusting for age at randomization (\<65 vs ≥65), sex (male vs female), and smoking history (smoker vs non-smoker) with ties handled using the Breslow approach.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.06 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.29
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.380 (Analysis performed using a stratified log rank test adjusting for age at randomization (\<65 vs ≥65), sex (male vs female), and smoking history (smoker vs non-smoker) with ties handled using the Breslow approach.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.91 · 95% CI 0.74 to 1.12
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.048 (Analysis performed using a stratified log rank test adjusting for age at randomization (\<65 vs ≥65), sex (male vs female), and smoking history (smoker vs non-smoker) with ties handled using the Breslow approach.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.75 · 95% CI 0.56 to 1.00
  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.626 (Analysis performed using a stratified log rank test adjusting for age at randomization (\<65 vs ≥65), sex (male vs female), and smoking history (smoker vs non-smoker) with ties handled using the Breslow approach.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.94 · 95% CI 0.75 to 1.19
SecondaryPharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations

To evaluate PK, blood samples were collected pre-dose and post-dose and trough and peak serum concentrations of durvalumab, respectively, were determined. Pre-dose samples were taken within 60 minutes before infusion and post-dose samples were taken within 10 minutes after the end of infusion.

Time frame:
Samples were collected pre-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 8, Week 24 and Week 48, and post-dose on Day 1 (Week 0) and Week 24. Analysis performed at 22 Mar 2018 DCO.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations
Micrograms per milliliterDurvalumab (MEDI4736)
Week 0: peak concentration191.00 ± 72.4
Week 8: trough concentration120.00 ± 62.2
Week 24: trough concentration177.00 ± 47.9
Week 24: peak concentration373.00 ± 43.6
Week 48: trough concentration186.00 ± 67.4
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab

ADA positive post-baseline only was also referred to as treatment-induced ADA positive. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted by ≥4-fold following drug administration. Persistently positive was defined as positive at ≥2 post-baseline assessments (with ≥16 weeks between first and last positive) or positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as having at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of persistently positive. Confirmed ADA positive samples were subsequently tested in a neutralizing antibody assay.

Time frame:
Samples were collected pre-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 8, Week 24 and Week 48. Analysis performed at 22 Mar 2018 DCO.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab
ParticipantsDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
ADA positive at any visit1910
ADA positive post-baseline only85
Treatment-boosted ADA positive00
ADA positive at baseline and post-baseline22
ADA positive at baseline only93
ADA persistently positive55
ADA transient positive52
Neutralizing antibodies positive at any visit30

Adverse events

Collected over Serious and Other (non-serious) treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) data collected during the 12-month treatment period. All-cause mortality (death due to any cause) collected for entire duration of the study. Assessed until 11 Jan 2021 DCO for completion of long-term survival; approximately 5 years from last patient enrolled.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Durvalumab (MEDI4736)262/475 (55.2%)138/475 (29.1%)436/475 (91.8%)
Placebo154/234 (65.8%)54/234 (23.1%)212/234 (90.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 140
Most frequent serious events
EventDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
PneumoniaInfections and infestations33/47514/234
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders17/4757/234
Radiation pneumonitisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications17/4754/234
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders5/4750/234
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/4750/234
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/4752/234
SepsisInfections and infestations4/4752/234
FatigueGeneral disorders0/4752/234
Pneumonia necrotisingInfections and infestations0/4752/234
Interstitial lung diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/4752/234
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 37
Most frequent other events
EventDurvalumab (MEDI4736)Placebo
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders169/47559/234
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders106/47557/234
FatigueGeneral disorders114/47547/234
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders87/47546/234
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders83/47544/234
Radiation pneumonitisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications80/47533/234
PyrexiaGeneral disorders70/47522/234
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders69/47529/234
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders68/47531/234
AstheniaGeneral disorders51/47531/234

Baseline characteristics

Baseline analysis was based on the FAS consisting of all randomized patients.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Durvalumab (MEDI4736)PlaceboTotal
Mean63.0 ± 8.6662.6 ± 9.6462.9 ± 8.99
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Durvalumab (MEDI4736)PlaceboTotal
Female14271213
Male334166500
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Durvalumab (MEDI4736)PlaceboTotal
White337157494
Black or African American12214
Asian12072192
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander112
American Indian or Alaska Native459
Other101
Missing101
Smoking History
Smoking History(Participants)Durvalumab (MEDI4736)PlaceboTotal
Non-smoker432164
Ex-smoker354178532
Current smoker7938117
08

Study locations

236 sites
  • Research Site
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Research Site
    Goodyear, Arizona 85338, United States
  • Research Site
    Jonesboro, Arkansas 72405, United States
  • Research Site
    Springdale, Arkansas 72762, United States
  • Research Site
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • Research Site
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Research Site
    Oxnard, California 93030, United States
  • Research Site
    Sacramento, California 95816, United States
  • Research Site
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Research Site
    Santa Rosa, California 95403, United States
  • Research Site
    Norwich, Connecticut 06360, United States
  • Research Site
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • Research Site
    Fort Myers, Florida 33901, United States
  • Research Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207, United States
  • Research Site
    Miami Beach, Florida 33140, United States
  • Research Site
    Orlando, Florida 32804, United States
  • Research Site
    Port Saint Lucie, Florida 34952, United States
  • Research Site
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33705, United States
  • Research Site
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Research Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30318, United States
  • Research Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Research Site
    Fort Gordon, Georgia 30905, United States
  • Research Site
    Lawrenceville, Georgia 30046, United States
  • Research Site
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Research Site
    Waterloo, Iowa 50701, United States
  • Research Site
    Topeka, Kansas 66606, United States
  • Research Site
    Hazard, Kentucky 41701, United States
  • Research Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Research Site
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
  • Research Site
    Rosedale, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Research Site
    Salisbury, Maryland 21801, United States
  • Research Site
    Towson, Maryland 21204, United States
  • Research Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Research Site
    Lansing, Michigan 48910, United States
  • Research Site
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426, United States
  • Research Site
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Research Site
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68510, United States
  • Research Site
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Research Site
    Lake Success, New York 11041, United States
  • Research Site
    The Bronx, New York 10461, United States
  • Research Site
    Burlington, North Carolina 27215, United States
  • Research Site
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Research Site
    Pinehurst, North Carolina 28374, United States
  • Research Site
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Research Site
    Blue Ash, Ohio 45242, United States
  • Research Site
    Easley, South Carolina 29640, United States
  • Research Site
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37404, United States
  • Research Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Research Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8805, United States
  • Research Site
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • Research Site
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Research Site
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Research Site
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Research Site
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Research Site
    Tyler, Texas 75702, United States
  • Research Site
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84106, United States
  • Research Site
    Fairfax, Virginia 22031, United States
  • Research Site
    Spokane, Washington 99208, United States
  • Research Site
    Spokane, Washington 99218, United States
  • Research Site
    Vancouver, Washington 98684, United States
  • Research Site
    Bedford Park, 5042, Australia
  • Research Site
    Bendigo, 3550, Australia
  • Research Site
    Box Hill, 3128, Australia
  • Research Site
    Clayton, 3168, Australia
  • Research Site
    Heidelberg, 3084, Australia
  • Research Site
    Herston, 4029, Australia
  • Research Site
    Kogarah, 2217, Australia
  • Research Site
    Launceston, 7250, Australia
  • Research Site
    Nedlands, 6009, Australia
  • Research Site
    Port Macquarie, 2444, Australia
  • Research Site
    Randwick, 2031, Australia
  • Research Site
    Westmead, 2145, Australia
  • Research Site
    Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia
  • Research Site
    Aalst, 9300, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Gilly, 6060, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Libramont-Chevigny, 6800, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Barrie, Ontario L4M 6M2, Canada
  • Research Site
    London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 2P9, Canada
  • Research Site
    Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9, Canada
  • Research Site
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
  • Research Site
    Toronto, M5G 2M9, Canada
  • Research Site
    Santiago, 7500000, Chile
  • Research Site
    Santiago, 8420383, Chile
  • Research Site
    Viña del Mar, Chile
  • Research Site
    Avignon, 84918, France
  • Research Site
    Bayonne, 64100, France
  • Research Site
    Brest, 29609, France
  • Research Site
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Research Site
    Lyon, 69008, France
  • Research Site
    Marseille, 13915, France
  • Research Site
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Research Site
    Nantes, 44202, France
  • Research Site
    Nice, 06100, France
  • Research Site
    Pau, 6400, France

Showing the first 100 of 236 sites across 26 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Brunetti L, Santo V, Pinato DJ, Citarella F, Orlando S, Acker F, Colella V, Ricciuti B, Naidoo J, Nassar A, Wakelee HA, Takada K, Naqash AR, Garassino MC, Greco C, Ramella S, Pantano F, Tonini G, Vincenzi B, Arlunno B, Remon J, Parisi C, Planchard D, Besse B, Desilets A, Routy B, Elkrief A, Barlesi F, Derosa L, Cortellini A. Differential impact of proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics on immunotherapy efficacy after chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2026 Aug;27(8):1043-1056. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(26)00191-9. Epub 2026 Jul 3. PubMed 42398520 ↗
  • Naidoo J, Antonia S, Wu YL, Cho BC, Thiyagarajah P, Mann H, Newton M, Faivre-Finn C. Brief Report: Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis From PACIFIC. J Thorac Oncol. 2023 May;18(5):657-663. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Feb 24. PubMed 36841540 ↗
  • Senan S, Ozguroglu M, Daniel D, Villegas A, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Faivre-Finn C, Paz-Ares L, Wu YL, Mann H, Dennis PA, Antonia SJ. Outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: an exploratory analysis from the PACIFIC trial. ESMO Open. 2022 Apr;7(2):100410. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100410. Epub 2022 Mar 2. PubMed 35247871 ↗
  • Naidoo J, Vansteenkiste JF, Faivre-Finn C, Ozguroglu M, Murakami S, Hui R, Quantin X, Broadhurst H, Newton M, Thiyagarajah P, Antonia SJ. Characterizing immune-mediated adverse events with durvalumab in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC: A post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial. Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr;166:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 9. PubMed 35245844 ↗
  • Spigel DR, Faivre-Finn C, Gray JE, Vicente D, Planchard D, Paz-Ares L, Vansteenkiste JF, Garassino MC, Hui R, Quantin X, Rimner A, Wu YL, Ozguroglu M, Lee KH, Kato T, de Wit M, Kurata T, Reck M, Cho BC, Senan S, Naidoo J, Mann H, Newton M, Thiyagarajah P, Antonia SJ. Five-Year Survival Outcomes From the PACIFIC Trial: Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr 20;40(12):1301-1311. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01308. Epub 2022 Feb 2. PubMed 35108059 ↗
  • Ouwens M, Darilay A, Zhang Y, Mukhopadhyay P, Mann H, Ryan J, Dennis PA. Assessing the Influence of Subsequent Immunotherapy on Overall Survival in Patients with Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from the PACIFIC Study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2021 Aug 12;95:100640. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100640. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34484473 ↗
  • Socinski MA, Ozguroglu M, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Gray JE, Park K, Vincent M, Mann H, Newton M, Dennis PA, Antonia SJ. Durvalumab After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (PACIFIC). Clin Lung Cancer. 2021 Nov;22(6):549-561. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 12. PubMed 34294595 ↗
  • Garassino MC, Paz-Ares L, Hui R, Faivre-Finn C, Spira A, Planchard D, Ozguroglu M, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Langer C, Senan S, Spigel D, Ryden A, Zhang Y, O'Brien C, Dennis PA, Antonia SJ. Patient-reported outcomes with durvalumab by PD-L1 expression and prior chemoradiotherapy-related variables in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2021 Apr;17(10):1165-1184. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1102. Epub 2021 Feb 15. PubMed 33583206 ↗
  • Mehra R, Yong C, Seal B, van Keep M, Raad A, Zhang Y. Cost-Effectiveness of Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: A US Healthcare Perspective. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Feb 2;19(2):153-162. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7621. Print 2021 Feb. PubMed 33545688 ↗
  • Faivre-Finn C, Vicente D, Kurata T, Planchard D, Paz-Ares L, Vansteenkiste JF, Spigel DR, Garassino MC, Reck M, Senan S, Naidoo J, Rimner A, Wu YL, Gray JE, Ozguroglu M, Lee KH, Cho BC, Kato T, de Wit M, Newton M, Wang L, Thiyagarajah P, Antonia SJ. Four-Year Survival With Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC-an Update From the PACIFIC Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2021 May;16(5):860-867. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Jan 19. PubMed 33476803 ↗
  • Faivre-Finn C, Spigel DR, Senan S, Langer C, Perez BA, Ozguroglu M, Daniel D, Villegas A, Vicente D, Hui R, Murakami S, Paz-Ares L, Broadhurst H, Wadsworth C, Dennis PA, Antonia SJ. Impact of prior chemoradiotherapy-related variables on outcomes with durvalumab in unresectable Stage III NSCLC (PACIFIC). Lung Cancer. 2021 Jan;151:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.11.024. Epub 2020 Nov 26. PubMed 33285469 ↗
  • Paz-Ares L, Spira A, Raben D, Planchard D, Cho BC, Ozguroglu M, Daniel D, Villegas A, Vicente D, Hui R, Murakami S, Spigel D, Senan S, Langer CJ, Perez BA, Boothman AM, Broadhurst H, Wadsworth C, Dennis PA, Antonia SJ, Faivre-Finn C. Outcomes with durvalumab by tumour PD-L1 expression in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in the PACIFIC trial. Ann Oncol. 2020 Jun;31(6):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.287. Epub 2020 Mar 21. PubMed 32209338 ↗
  • Gray JE, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Kurata T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, Cho BC, Planchard D, Paz-Ares L, Faivre-Finn C, Vansteenkiste JF, Spigel DR, Wadsworth C, Taboada M, Dennis PA, Ozguroglu M, Antonia SJ. Three-Year Overall Survival with Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC-Update from PACIFIC. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Feb;15(2):288-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 14. PubMed 31622733 ↗
  • Hui R, Ozguroglu M, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Yokoi T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M, Cho BC, Gray JE, Ryden A, Viviers L, Poole L, Zhang Y, Dennis PA, Antonia SJ. Patient-reported outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (PACIFIC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1670-1680. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30519-4. Epub 2019 Oct 7. PubMed 31601496 ↗
  • Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Kurata T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M, Cho BC, Bourhaba M, Quantin X, Tokito T, Mekhail T, Planchard D, Kim YC, Karapetis CS, Hiret S, Ostoros G, Kubota K, Gray JE, Paz-Ares L, de Castro Carpeno J, Faivre-Finn C, Reck M, Vansteenkiste J, Spigel DR, Wadsworth C, Melillo G, Taboada M, Dennis PA, Ozguroglu M; PACIFIC Investigators. Overall Survival with Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2342-2350. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809697. Epub 2018 Sep 25. PubMed 30280658 ↗
  • Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Yokoi T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M, Cho BC, Bourhaba M, Quantin X, Tokito T, Mekhail T, Planchard D, Kim YC, Karapetis CS, Hiret S, Ostoros G, Kubota K, Gray JE, Paz-Ares L, de Castro Carpeno J, Wadsworth C, Melillo G, Jiang H, Huang Y, Dennis PA, Ozguroglu M; PACIFIC Investigators. Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1919-1929. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937. Epub 2017 Sep 8. PubMed 28885881 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 4, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 22, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Access criteria: When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Data sharing details ↗ · astrazenecagroup-dt.pharmacm.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02125461
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 29, 2014
Start date
May 7, 2014
Primary completion
Feb 13, 2017
Completion
Aug 24, 2023
Results posted
Jan 30, 2019
Last update
Oct 10, 2023

Study contacts

Phil Dennis, MD
study director · AstraZeneca

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Durvalumab

Start the discussion