CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02122458Updated Jun 22, 2023Results posted

Blast Exposed Veterans With Auditory Complaints

An interventional study of mild-gain hearing aids with high-frequency emphasis over 6-months in Hearing Impairment and Hearing Aid Fitting, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-22.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
363
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to study blast-exposed Veterans who report hearing handicap but show normal or near normal results on standard audiometric testing. The characteristics and nature of their auditory and auditory-related skills will be examined, along with whether coexisting PTSD contributes to the hearing problems of these Veterans. In a preliminary treatment study, a sub-sample of these Veterans will be fitted with mild-gain hearing aids to determine if they benefit from low-level amplification of high-frequency sounds.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to study blast-exposed Veterans who report hearing handicap but show normal or near normal results on standard audiometric testing. The characteristics and nature of their auditory and auditory-related skills will be examined with a battery of behavioral and physiologic measures. The potential contributions of co-occurring PTSD also will be evaluated. In a preliminary treatment study, a sub-sample of the targeted Veterans will be fitted with mild-gain hearing aids to determine if they benefit from low-level amplification of high-frequency sounds.

This study consists of two parts. In Part 1, four groups of Veterans, aged 20 - 50 years, will complete a battery of auditory and auditory-related assessments to better understand the deficit sources and patterns. The assessment measures will consist of questionnaires, behavioral tests, and auditory physiologic measures. One group will consist of blast-exposed Veterans with auditory problems but no PTSD. The second group will consist of blast-exposed Veterans with auditory problems plus PTSD. The third group will consist of Veterans with PTSD but no reported auditory problems, and the fourth groups will be a normal control group.

In Part 2 of the study (clinical trial portion), a smaller group of participants from the first and second groups will be fitted with mild-gain open-fit hearing aids to determine if they benefit from mild high-frequency amplification. Changes in hearing handicap and speech perception will be compared from baseline to 6-months post-fitting. Perceived hearing aid benefit, hearing aid use time, and intent to continue use will be measured at the end of a 6-month treatment period. A delayed treatment group will be formed from group 1 and will be followed over a 12-month period with hearing aids fitted at 6 months. The participants will be assigned randomly from Part 1 of the study.

The information obtained from this study will help us understand the auditory problems experienced by blast-exposed Veterans and eventually contribute to the development of an efficient and effective assessment battery and intervention approaches.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hearing Impairment
  • Hearing Aid Fitting

Keywords

  • hearing impairment
  • post-traumatic stress disorder
  • traumatic brain injury
  • auditory processing disorder
03

In context

Hearing Loss

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 363 is above the median of 40 across 764 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • age 20 - 50 years; U.S. Veteran;
  • English-speaking;
  • history of blast exposure and no history of blast exposure;
  • history of PTSD and no history of PTSD;
  • self-perceived hearing handicap and no self-perceived hearing handicap;
  • normal or near normal pure tone hearing thresholds;
  • history of brain injury and no history of brain injury;
  • normal vision.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hyperacusis;
  • marked tinnitus;
  • pure tone hearing thresholds consistent with a hearing loss;
  • greater the 20/30 vision screening results (corrected or uncorrected);
  • marked speech perception deficits
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
363 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only

    This group consisted of blast-exposed Veterans with auditory complaints but normal audiometric test results. These Veterans were negative for significant PTSD. They were fitted with open-fit hearing aids that provided mild high-frequency amplification and were monitored for 6 months.

    Device: mild-gain hearing aids with high-frequency emphasis over 6-months

  • Active comparator
    Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed with PTSD

    This group consisted of blast-exposed Veterans with auditory complaints but normal audiometric test results. These Veterans were comorbid for significant PTSD. They were fitted with open-fit hearing aids that provided mild high-frequency amplification and were monitored for 6 months.

    Device: mild-gain hearing aids with high-frequency emphasis over 6-months

  • Active comparator
    Delayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only

    This group consisted of blast-exposed Veterans with auditory complaints but normal audiometric test results. These Veterans were negative for significant PTSD. They were fitted with hearing aids after a 6-month delay. Their performance was monitored 6-months pre-fitting and for the 6 months after the fitting.

    Device: mild-gain hearing aids with high-frequency emphasis over 6-months

  • No intervention
    Non-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Normal

    This group consisted of Veterans who completed the same pre-treatment diagnostic testing as the three treatment groups but were not enrolled in the hearing aid treatment protocol. This group included neurotypical Veterans with normal hearing and were negative for blast-exposure and PTSD.

  • No intervention
    Non-Treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed Only

    This group consisted of Veterans who completed the same pre-treatment diagnostic testing as the three treatment groups but were not enrolled in the hearing aid treatment protocol. This group consisted of blast-exposed Veterans with auditory complaints but normal audiometric test results. They were negative for significant PTSD.

  • No intervention
    Non-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed with PTSD

    This group consisted of Veterans who completed the same pre-treatment diagnostic testing as the three treatment groups but were not enrolled in the hearing aid treatment protocol. This group consisted of blast-exposed Veterans with auditory complaints but normal audiometric test results. These Veterans were comorbid for significant PTSD.

  • No intervention
    Non-treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD Only

    This group consisted of Veterans who completed the same pre-treatment diagnostic testing as the three treatment groups but were not enrolled in the hearing aid treatment protocol. This group was negative for blast-exposure and hearing loss but positive for significant PTSD.

Interventions

  • Devicemild-gain hearing aids with high-frequency emphasis over 6-months

    open-fit hearing aids with mild amplification in the high frequencies.

    Also known as: hearing aids

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA)

    Self-perceived hearing handicap was measured with the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA), pre- and 6-months post-hearing aid fitting. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with the higher score reflecting greater handicap (worse outcome). The data are presented as a comparison between the two questionnaire administrations (pre- and 6-months post-fitting). The null hypothesis tested was that there would be no difference between the HHIA administered at baseline (pre-fitting) and 6-months post-fitting for all groups.

    Time frame: The participants wore their hearing aids for 6 months-fitting (baseline to 6-months post-fitting). The delayed group had a 6-month delay prior to treatment.

  2. Hearing Aid Benefit (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, APHAB)

    The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was administered at the end of the treatment period (6-months post-fitting) to measure self-perceived benefit. The APHAB is a 24-item self-assessment inventory used to indicate the extent to which listeners experience listening difficulties (with and without hearing aids) in various settings. The questionnaire uses a 7-point scale that corresponds to the frequency with which difficulties are experienced (99 to 1% of the time). The APHAB was administered for both unaided listening and aided listening, and benefit was calculated by subtracting the mean aided scores from the mean unaided scores. Higher benefit scores (e.g., 99% unaided - 25% aided vs. 99% unaided - 50% aided) reflected greater benefit (better outcome) and negative scores were possible. The null hypothesis tested was that no hearing aid benefit would be demonstrated by any of the 3 groups at 6-months post-fitting.

    Time frame: The APHAB was administered 6-months post-fitting. The delayed group had a 6-month delay prior to the treatment (6-months of wearing the hearing aids).

  3. Intent to Continue Use

    The participants reported whether they would continue to use their hearing aids after the study has ended. The null hypothesis tested was that neither group would demonstrate a significant preference for retaining their hearing aids.

    Time frame: 6 months post-fitting

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hearing Aid Use Time (Number of Participants With an Average Hearing Aid Use Time of 4 Hours a Day)

    Hearing aid use time was the number of participants who wore their hearing aids for an average of at least 4 hours per day. The average number of hours that the participants used their hearing aids was measured by their hearing aid data logging systems. These data were collected at the end of the treatment interval for each participant and were considered a positive outcome if they wore their hearing aids at least 4 hours a day on average after 1 month of use. The null hypothesis tested was that none of the participants in the three groups would not demonstrate hearing aid use time 4 hours or more, on average per day.

    Time frame: Hearing aid use time was collected at 6 months post-fitting.

  2. Speech Perception in Quiet and in Noise

    The participants' speech perception was measured at the word level with the California Consonant Test (CCT). The CCT is a 50 item a closed-set word identification test. It was administered at 3 timepoints (pre-fitting, 1-week post-fitting, and 6-months post-fitting), with testing was completed in quiet and in background noise (speech babble, +3 dB signal/babble) at each timepoint. The participants were unaided during the pre-fitting testing but wore their hearing aids during the two post-fitting sessions. The outcome measure was the proportion of correct trials out of 50. A correct trial consisted of an accurate identification of the target word presented to the participant in the sound-field at 40 dB sensation level. The null hypothesis tested was that speech perception would not improve over the treatment intervals for the groups for either test condition (quiet and noise).

    Time frame: The CCT was administered immediately pre-fitting (unaided), 1 week post-fitting (aided), and 6 months post-fitting (aided).

07

Results

Posted Jun 22, 2023
Limitations and caveats
The hearing aid treatment portion of this study was preliminary in nature and limited by the number of participants enrolled and amount of time with which those enrolled wore their hearing aids. Problems with hearing aid wear-time compliance limited interpretation and applicability.

Participant flow

The participants were recruited through flyers, letters, VA audiologists, and Veteran organizations. Recruitment activities occurred Year 1 through Year 4 of the study. It should be noted that the participants enrolled in the hearing aid treatment arms (clinical trial portion of the study) completed diagnostic testing prior to completing the hearing aid treatment. The remaining participants only completed the diagnostic testing (Non-treatment Diagnostic Testing).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: NormalNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed With PTSDNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD Only
Started1218782454319
Completed913767312318
Not completed3501514201
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0004440
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up13075151
Withdrew: Did not qualify at initial testing or after chart review1000000
Withdrew: Adverse event1000000
Withdrew: Experimental error0000300
Withdrew: Deployed or moved0000100
Withdrew: Scheduling delays - unable to complete0104110
Withdrew: Noncompliance0100000

Outcome measures

PrimaryHearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA)

Self-perceived hearing handicap was measured with the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA), pre- and 6-months post-hearing aid fitting. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with the higher score reflecting greater handicap (worse outcome). The data are presented as a comparison between the two questionnaire administrations (pre- and 6-months post-fitting). The null hypothesis tested was that there would be no difference between the HHIA administered at baseline (pre-fitting) and 6-months post-fitting for all groups.

Time frame:
The participants wore their hearing aids for 6 months-fitting (baseline to 6-months post-fitting). The delayed group had a 6-month delay prior to treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · Scale score
Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA)
Scale scoreImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only
Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA)26.20 (19.04 to 33.33)37.34 (31.37 to 43.32)19.21 (10.48 to 27.95)
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only vs Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSD vs Delayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .05 (Given the preliminary nature of this treatment study and the small number of participants the p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): .448 · 95% CI -8.66 to 9.56An Adjusted Rank Transform was applied to the data prior to applying the mixed model analyses.
PrimaryHearing Aid Benefit (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, APHAB)

The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was administered at the end of the treatment period (6-months post-fitting) to measure self-perceived benefit. The APHAB is a 24-item self-assessment inventory used to indicate the extent to which listeners experience listening difficulties (with and without hearing aids) in various settings. The questionnaire uses a 7-point scale that corresponds to the frequency with which difficulties are experienced (99 to 1% of the time). The APHAB was administered for both unaided listening and aided listening, and benefit was calculated by subtracting the mean aided scores from the mean unaided scores. Higher benefit scores (e.g., 99% unaided - 25% aided vs. 99% unaided - 50% aided) reflected greater benefit (better outcome) and negative scores were possible. The null hypothesis tested was that no hearing aid benefit would be demonstrated by any of the 3 groups at 6-months post-fitting.

Time frame:
The APHAB was administered 6-months post-fitting. The delayed group had a 6-month delay prior to the treatment (6-months of wearing the hearing aids).
Reported as:
Mean · Scale score
Hearing Aid Benefit (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, APHAB)
Scale scoreImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-Exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only
Hearing Aid Benefit (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, APHAB)-.362 ± .301-.270 ± .821-.080 ± .331
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-Exposed Only vs Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSD vs Delayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only · ANOVA · p = .05 (Given the small sample size and the preliminary nature of this study, the p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.)
PrimaryIntent to Continue Use

The participants reported whether they would continue to use their hearing aids after the study has ended. The null hypothesis tested was that neither group would demonstrate a significant preference for retaining their hearing aids.

Time frame:
6 months post-fitting
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Intent to Continue Use
ParticipantsImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-Exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-Exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only
Intent to Continue Use9137
SecondaryHearing Aid Use Time (Number of Participants With an Average Hearing Aid Use Time of 4 Hours a Day)

Hearing aid use time was the number of participants who wore their hearing aids for an average of at least 4 hours per day. The average number of hours that the participants used their hearing aids was measured by their hearing aid data logging systems. These data were collected at the end of the treatment interval for each participant and were considered a positive outcome if they wore their hearing aids at least 4 hours a day on average after 1 month of use. The null hypothesis tested was that none of the participants in the three groups would not demonstrate hearing aid use time 4 hours or more, on average per day.

Time frame:
Hearing aid use time was collected at 6 months post-fitting.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Hearing Aid Use Time (Number of Participants With an Average Hearing Aid Use Time of 4 Hours a Day)
ParticipantsImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only
Hearing Aid Use Time (Number of Participants With an Average Hearing Aid Use Time of 4 Hours a Day)973
SecondarySpeech Perception in Quiet and in Noise

The participants' speech perception was measured at the word level with the California Consonant Test (CCT). The CCT is a 50 item a closed-set word identification test. It was administered at 3 timepoints (pre-fitting, 1-week post-fitting, and 6-months post-fitting), with testing was completed in quiet and in background noise (speech babble, +3 dB signal/babble) at each timepoint. The participants were unaided during the pre-fitting testing but wore their hearing aids during the two post-fitting sessions. The outcome measure was the proportion of correct trials out of 50. A correct trial consisted of an accurate identification of the target word presented to the participant in the sound-field at 40 dB sensation level. The null hypothesis tested was that speech perception would not improve over the treatment intervals for the groups for either test condition (quiet and noise).

Time frame:
The CCT was administered immediately pre-fitting (unaided), 1 week post-fitting (aided), and 6 months post-fitting (aided).
Reported as:
Mean · Proportion Correct
Speech Perception in Quiet and in Noise
Proportion CorrectImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only
Pre-fitting Score in Quiet.92 ± .017.93 ± .013.95 ± .018
Pre-fitting Score in Noise.69 ± .044.73 ± .033.72 ± .047
1-week Post-fitting Test Score in Quiet.96 ± .018.93 ± .014.95 ± .019
1-week Post-fitting Test Score in Noise.83 ± .046.79 ± .035.79 ± .049
Final Test Score in Quiet.96 ± .009.95 ± .007.95 ± .010
Final Test Score in Noise.84 ± .037.82 ± .028.71 ± .040

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were queried for each individual participant per session from enrollment to completion of their participation in study and summarized yearly at IRB renewal, Adverse Events were collected for 6 months from all participants except for those enrolled in the Delayed Hearing Aid Treatment Arm/Group, which was assessed for up to 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only0/12 (0%)1/12 (8.3%)0/12 (0%)
Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSD0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Delayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed Only0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)
Non-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Normal0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)
Non-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed Only0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)
Non-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed With PTSD0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)
Non-treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD Only0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: NormalNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed With PTSDNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD Only
Middle ear infection and massEar and labyrinth disorders1/120/180/70/820/450/430/19

Baseline characteristics

Veterans between the ages of 20 and 50 years of age who had normal hearing on standard audiometric testing, who had significant or no self-reported hearing handicap, significant or no history of blast-exposure, significant or no PTSD, normal vision and no history of prior brain injuries or diseases that were not blast-related. Preliminary testing and review of clinical records excluded 137 participants. These participants are not included in the baseline participant numbers.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: NormalNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed With PTSDNon-Treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD OnlyTotal
Mean37.01 ± 8.6337.46 ± 6.7339.21 ± 8.4735.23 ± 8.2935.32 ± 6.7234.52 ± 6.4234.85 ± 8.1037.08 ± 7.77
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: NormalNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed With PTSDNon-Treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD OnlyTotal
Participants by Sex — Number of Male Participants Per Arm1015756393810175
Participants by Sex — Number of Female Participants Per Arm2302665951
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: NormalNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed With PTSDNon-Treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD OnlyTotal
Hispanic or Latino210854121
Not Hispanic or Latino1017773403918204
Unknown or Not Reported00010001
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: NormalNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed With PTSDNon-Treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD OnlyTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native02110004
Asian00010214
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00010001
Black or African American2021425126
White1015356403216172
More than one race010934118
Unknown or Not Reported00100001
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: NormalNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed With PTSDNon-Treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD OnlyTotal
United States1218782454319226
Age
Age(Years)Immediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyImmediate Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed With PTSDDelayed Hearing Aid Treatment: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: NormalNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed OnlyNon-treatment Diagnostic Testing: Blast-exposed With PTSDNon-Treatment Diagnostic Testing: PTSD OnlyTotal
Mean37.01 (26.4 to 50.6)37.46 (27.7 to 49.1)39.21 (28.3 to 50.9)35.23 (20.6 to 50.9)35.32 (23.2 to 49.9)34.52 (23.4 to 48.6)34.85 (25.10 to 49.10)37.08 (20.6 to 50.9)
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15240, United States
  • Sioux Falls VA Health Care System, Sioux Falls, SD
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57117-5046, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gallun FJ, Papesh MA, Lewis MS. Hearing complaints among veterans following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2017;31(9):1183-1187. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1274781. PubMed 28981349 ↗
  • Gallun FJ, Lewis MS, Folmer RL, Diedesch AC, Kubli LR, McDermott DJ, Walden TC, Fausti SA, Lew HL, Leek MR. Implications of blast exposure for central auditory function: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(7):1059-74. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.09.0166. PubMed 23341279 ↗
  • Koerner TK, A Papesh M, Gallun FJ. A Questionnaire Survey of Current Rehabilitation Practices for Adults With Normal Hearing Sensitivity Who Experience Auditory Difficulties. Am J Audiol. 2020 Dec 9;29(4):738-761. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00027. Epub 2020 Sep 23. PubMed 32966118 ↗
  • Folmer RL, Billings CJ, Diedesch-Rouse AC, Gallun FJ, Lew HL. Electrophysiological assessments of cognition and sensory processing in TBI: applications for diagnosis, prognosis and rehabilitation. Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Oct;82(1):4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Mar 16. PubMed 21419179 ↗
  • Papesh MA, Stefl AA, Gallun FJ, Billings CJ. Effects of Signal Type and Noise Background on Auditory Evoked Potential N1, P2, and P3 Measurements in Blast-Exposed Veterans. Ear Hear. 2021 Jan/Feb;42(1):106-121. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000906. PubMed 32520849 ↗
  • Hoover EC, Souza PE, Gallun FJ. Auditory and Cognitive Factors Associated with Speech-in-Noise Complaints following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Apr;28(4):325-339. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16051. PubMed 28418327 ↗
  • Gallun FJ, Diedesch AC, Kubli LR, Walden TC, Folmer RL, Lewis MS, McDermott DJ, Fausti SA, Leek MR. Performance on tests of central auditory processing by individuals exposed to high-intensity blasts. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(7):1005-25. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2012.03.0038. PubMed 23341276 ↗
  • Fausti SA, Wilmington DJ, Gallun FJ, Myers PJ, Henry JA. Auditory and vestibular dysfunction associated with blast-related traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(6):797-810. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.09.0118. PubMed 20104403 ↗
  • Reavis KM, Snowden JM, Henry JA, Gallun FJ, Lewis MS, Carlson KF. Blast Exposure and Self-Reported Hearing Difficulty in Service Members and Veterans Who Have Normal Pure-Tone Hearing Sensitivity: The Mediating Role of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Nov 8;64(11):4458-4467. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00687. Epub 2021 Sep 28. PubMed 34582257 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 11, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified Individual participant data and the study data dictionary will be made available upon request to the PI (spratt@pitt.edu).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02122458
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 24, 2014
Start date
Aug 1, 2015
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2020
Results posted
Jun 22, 2023
Last update
Jun 22, 2023

Study contacts

Sheila R Pratt, PhD
principal investigator · VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion