CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02087943Updated May 7, 2020Results posted

Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Apremilast and Apremilast in Dermatitis, Atopic Dermatitis, sponsored by Amgen. Completed at 31 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-07.

Sponsored by Amgen · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
191
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast (CC-10004) in subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis

02

Conditions studied

  • Dermatitis, Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

  • Atopic Dermatitis
  • Atopic Eczema
03

In context

Dermatitis, Atopic

1,419 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic; 258 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 191 is above the median of 83 across 1,125 interventional studies indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic.

Browse Dermatitis, Atopic studies →

Lead sponsor

Amgen is the lead sponsor of 1,015 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Of its 245 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males or females, aged ≥ 18 years (≥ 20 for Japanese subjects) at the time of consent.
  2. Have a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis for ≥ 12 months.
  3. Have moderate to severe atopic dermatitis which is considered inappropriate for topical therapy or which cannot be adequately controlled by topical therapy.
  4. Meet the laboratory criteria as defined per protocol
  5. Females of Childbearing Potential (FCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and Baseline. Sexually active FCBP must use one of the approved contraceptive options required per protocol while on and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study medication
  6. Male subjects (including those who have had a vasectomy) who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use barrier contraception while on and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study medication.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active tuberculosis (TB) or a history of inadequately treated tuberculosis.
  2. Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody
  3. Pregnant or breast feeding
  4. History of allergy to any component of the study medication.
  5. Active skin infection requiring systemic antimicrobials at Baseline.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
191 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Apremilast 40 mg

    Apremilast 40 mg administered orally twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks (following dose titration) during the placebo controlled phase followed by 40 mg Apremilast tablets orally administered BID for an additional 12 weeks in the active treatment phase

    Drug: Apremilast

  • Experimental
    Apremilast 30 mg

    Apremilast 30 mg administered orally BID for 12 weeks (following dose titration) during the placebo controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets orally administered BID for an additional 12 weeks in the active treatment phase

    Drug: Apremilast

  • Experimental
    Placebo + Apremilast 40 mg

    Placebo administered orally BID for 12 weeks, during the placebo controlled phase followed by 40 mg Apremilast tablets orally BID for an additional 12 weeks in the active treatment phase

    Drug: Apremilast · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Placebo + Apremilast 30 mg

    Placebo administered orally BID for 12 weeks, during the placebo controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets orally BID for an additional 12 weeks in the active treatment phase

    Drug: Apremilast · Drug: Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Oral Placebo tablets administered twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugApremilast

    Orally twice a day (BID)

    Also known as: CC-10004, Otezla

  • DrugApremilast

    Orally twice a day (BID)

    Also known as: CC-10004, Otezla

  • DrugPlacebo

    Orally twice a day (BID)

  • DrugPlacebo

    Orally twice a day (BID)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12.

    EASI is a validated composite scoring system integrating the proportion of the body region (area) involved and the intensity of key signs of atopic dermatitis (AD). A representative lesion is selected for each of the four body regions for assessing the intensity of each of the four signs (erythema, induration /papulation, excoriation, and lichenification). Symptoms (eg, pruritus) and secondary signs (eg, xerosis, scaling) are excluded from the assessment. The total EASI score ranges from 0 to 72. A higher score indicated worse disease status, and a negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of 0 (Cleared) or 1 (Almost Cleared) and at Least a 2-point Reduction From Baseline in a Static Physician's Global Assessment of Acute Signs (sPGA-A) at Week 12.

    The sPGA-A is intended to assess the global severities (ie, a "visual average" integrating all areas of AD) of key acute clinical signs of AD, including erythema, induration/papulation, oozing/crusting (lichenification excluded) based on a 5-point scale of cleared (0), almost cleared (1), mild (2), moderate (3) and severe (4).

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in the EASI Score (EASI 50) at Week 12

    The EASI 50 reduction (defined as ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in EASI score) was selected to serve as the key responder endpoint. A ≥ 50% improvement is clinically meaningful for this population.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

  3. The Percentage Change From Baseline in the Average Weekly Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 4

    The participant completed a daily diary recording the average intensity of pruritus they experienced during the preceding 24 hrs. The intensity of pruritus was assessed using a validated 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 ("no pruritus") to 10 ("the worst pruritus imaginable"). It should be noted that this NRS is distinct from the pruritus, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in the Modified SCORAD Index with respect to recall period (three days for the VAS). The weekly NRS score was calculated as the average of the NRS scores over 7 days within the specified week. A higher score indicated worse disease status, and a negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo Controlled Period

    A TEAE is an adverse event with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of IP and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP for participants who discontinued early. An adverse event (AE) is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a pre existing condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE is any which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

  5. Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast Exposure Period

    A TEAE is an adverse event with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product (IP) and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP. An adverse event (AE) is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a pre existing condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE is any which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24; median duration of apremilast 30 mg was 23.3 weeks and 22.4 weeks for apremilast 40 mg

07

Results

Posted Dec 12, 2016

Participant flow

Placebo-Controlled Phase Week 0-12
Participant flow — Placebo-Controlled Phase Week 0-12
MilestonePlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mgPlacebo/Apremilast 30 mgPlacebo/Apremilast 40 mg
Started64586300
Safety population64586300
Completed50465000
Not completed14121300
Withdrew: Adverse event12600
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy87400
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject42200
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10100
Withdrew: Protocol violation01000
Active Treatment Phase Week 12-24
Participant flow — Active Treatment Phase Week 12-24
MilestonePlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mgPlacebo/Apremilast 30 mgPlacebo/Apremilast 40 mg
Started046492423
Completed042442221
Not completed04522
Withdrew: Adverse event01201
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy03110
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject00100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00001
Withdrew: Other-unspecified00110
Observational Follow-up Phase Week 24-30
Participant flow — Observational Follow-up Phase Week 24-30
MilestonePlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mgPlacebo/Apremilast 30 mgPlacebo/Apremilast 40 mg
Started046482423
Completed046452322
Not completed00311

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12.

EASI is a validated composite scoring system integrating the proportion of the body region (area) involved and the intensity of key signs of atopic dermatitis (AD). A representative lesion is selected for each of the four body regions for assessing the intensity of each of the four signs (erythema, induration /papulation, excoriation, and lichenification). Symptoms (eg, pruritus) and secondary signs (eg, xerosis, scaling) are excluded from the assessment. The total EASI score ranges from 0 to 72. A higher score indicated worse disease status, and a negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12.
percent changePlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mg
Percentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12.-10.98 ± 6.873-25.99 ± 7.106-31.57 ± 6.820
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Apremilast 30 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.1308 (Based on an analysis of covariance model with the percentage change from baseline as the response variable and the treatment group and Baseline EASI score stratification (≤ 20, \> 20) as factors.) · Ls mean difference: -15.01 · 95% CI -34.52 to 4.50
  • Placebo vs Apremilast 40 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.0347 (Based on an analysis of covariance model with the percentage change from Baseline as the response variable and the treatment group and Baseline EASI score stratification (≤ 20, \> 20) as factors.) · Ls mean difference: -20.60 · 95% CI -39.70 to -1.50
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of 0 (Cleared) or 1 (Almost Cleared) and at Least a 2-point Reduction From Baseline in a Static Physician's Global Assessment of Acute Signs (sPGA-A) at Week 12.

The sPGA-A is intended to assess the global severities (ie, a "visual average" integrating all areas of AD) of key acute clinical signs of AD, including erythema, induration/papulation, oozing/crusting (lichenification excluded) based on a 5-point scale of cleared (0), almost cleared (1), mild (2), moderate (3) and severe (4).

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of 0 (Cleared) or 1 (Almost Cleared) and at Least a 2-point Reduction From Baseline in a Static Physician's Global Assessment of Acute Signs (sPGA-A) at Week 12.
percentage of participantsPlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mg
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of 0 (Cleared) or 1 (Almost Cleared) and at Least a 2-point Reduction From Baseline in a Static Physician's Global Assessment of Acute Signs (sPGA-A) at Week 12.6.33.414.3
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Apremilast 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4938 (Adjusted treatment differences in proportions using the weighted average of the treatment differences across the stratum of baseline EASI score stratification (≤ 20, \> 20) with, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights.) · Adjusted difference in proportion: -2.7 · 95% CI -10.2 to 4.82-sided 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) is based on a normal approximation to the weighted average.
  • Placebo vs Apremilast 40 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1368 (Adjusted treatment differences in proportions using the weighted average of the treatment differences across the stratum of baseline EASI score stratification (≤ 20, \> 20) with, CMH weights.) · Adjusted difference in proportion: 8.0 · 95% CI -2.3 to 18.22-sided 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) is based on a normal approximation to the weighted average.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in the EASI Score (EASI 50) at Week 12

The EASI 50 reduction (defined as ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in EASI score) was selected to serve as the key responder endpoint. A ≥ 50% improvement is clinically meaningful for this population.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in the EASI Score (EASI 50) at Week 12
percentage of participantsPlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mg
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in the EASI Score (EASI 50) at Week 1232.831.042.9
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Apremilast 30 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8589 · Adjusted difference in proportion: -1.5 · 95% CI -18.0 to 14.9Adjusted differences in proportions was the weighted average of the treatment differences across the stratum of baseline EASI score stratification (≤ 20, \> 20) with the CMH weights.
  • Placebo vs Apremilast 40 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2476 · Adjusted difference in proportion: 9.9 · 95% CI -6.7 to 26.6Adjusted differences in proportions was the weighted average of the treatment differences across the stratum of baseline EASI score stratification (≤ 20, \> 20) with the CMH weights.
SecondaryThe Percentage Change From Baseline in the Average Weekly Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 4

The participant completed a daily diary recording the average intensity of pruritus they experienced during the preceding 24 hrs. The intensity of pruritus was assessed using a validated 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 ("no pruritus") to 10 ("the worst pruritus imaginable"). It should be noted that this NRS is distinct from the pruritus, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in the Modified SCORAD Index with respect to recall period (three days for the VAS). The weekly NRS score was calculated as the average of the NRS scores over 7 days within the specified week. A higher score indicated worse disease status, and a negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
The Percentage Change From Baseline in the Average Weekly Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 4
percent changePlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline in the Average Weekly Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 4-4.83 ± 5.657-10.00 ± 5.911-9.00 ± 5.850
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Apremilast 30 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.5286 · Ls mean difference: -5.17 · 95% CI -21.34 to 10.99Based on an analysis of covariance model with the percentage change from baseline as the response variable, treatment group and baseline EASI stratification (≤ 20, \> 20) as factors, and the baseline average weekly pruritus NRS score as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs Apremilast 40 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.6092 · Ls mean difference: -4.17 · 95% CI -20.22 to 11.88Based on an analysis of covariance model with the percentage change from baseline as the response variable, treatment group and baseline EASI stratification (≤ 20, \> 20) as factors, and the baseline average weekly pruritus NRS score as a covariate.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo Controlled Period

A TEAE is an adverse event with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of IP and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP for participants who discontinued early. An adverse event (AE) is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a pre existing condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE is any which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo Controlled Period
participantsPlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mg
TEAE303644
Drug-related TEAE82627
Severe TEAE001
Serious TEAE (SAE)012
Drug-related SAE001
TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption304
TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal126
Death000
SecondaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast Exposure Period

A TEAE is an adverse event with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product (IP) and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP. An adverse event (AE) is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a pre existing condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE is any which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24; median duration of apremilast 30 mg was 23.3 weeks and 22.4 weeks for apremilast 40 mg
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast Exposure Period
participantsApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mg
TEAE4961
Drug-related TEAE2938
Severe TEAE11
Serious TEAE (SAE)23
Drug-related SAE02
TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption08
TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal39
Death00

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events are reported for the 12-week placebo-controlled phase and up to 24 weeks for all participants who received apremilast at any time during the study. All TEAEs were recorded by the investigator from the time the participant received the first dose of study drug to no later than 28 days after the last dose of study drug.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo (Weeks 0-12)—0/64 (0%)14/64 (21.9%)
Apremilast 30 mg (Weeks 0-12)—1/58 (1.7%)22/58 (37.9%)
Apremilast 40 mg (Weeks 0-12)—2/63 (3.2%)30/63 (47.6%)
Apremilast 30 mg (Apremilast Exposure Period) 0-24—2/82 (2.4%)30/82 (36.6%)
Apremilast 40 mg (Apremilast Exposure Period) 0-24—3/86 (3.5%)45/86 (52.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo (Weeks 0-12)Apremilast 30 mg (Weeks 0-12)Apremilast 40 mg (Weeks 0-12)Apremilast 30 mg (Apremilast Exposure Period) 0-24Apremilast 40 mg (Apremilast Exposure Period) 0-24
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/640/581/630/822/86
Squamous Cell CarcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/641/580/631/820/86
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders0/640/581/630/821/86
GlomerulonephritisRenal and urinary disorders0/640/581/630/821/86
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/640/580/631/820/86
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo (Weeks 0-12)Apremilast 30 mg (Weeks 0-12)Apremilast 40 mg (Weeks 0-12)Apremilast 30 mg (Apremilast Exposure Period) 0-24Apremilast 40 mg (Apremilast Exposure Period) 0-24
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/6410/5815/6311/8221/86
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/646/586/638/8214/86
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/649/587/6310/8214/86
HeadacheNervous system disorders5/644/588/637/828/86
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations8/642/583/638/826/86
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/640/583/630/825/86
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/640/583/631/825/86
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders0/643/582/633/822/86
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders1/643/580/633/821/86

Baseline characteristics

Intent to Treat (ITT) includes all participants who were randomized as specified in the protocol and received at least one dose of Investigational product (IP)

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mgTotal
Mean37.7 ± 14.7139.2 ± 15.8038.3 ± 14.7438.4 ± 15.00
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboApremilast 30 mgApremilast 40 mgTotal
Female39273298
Male25313187
08

Study locations

31 sites
  • Arizona Research Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85023, United States
  • Bakersfield Dermatology and Skin Cancer Medical Group
    Bakersfield, California 93309, United States
  • Dermatology Research Associates
    Los Angeles, California 90045, United States
  • Renstar Medical Research
    Ocala, Florida 34471, United States
  • Emory Clinic
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Advanced Medical Research
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Northwestern University Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Northwestern Medicine Lake Forest Hospital
    Lake Forest, Illinois 60045, United States
  • Dermatology Specialists, PSC
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • NYU Department of Dermatology
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • PMG Research of Winston-Salem LLC
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103-3914, United States
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97201-3098, United States
  • Virginia Clinical Research Inc
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • Chih-Ho Hong Medical, Inc.
    Surrey, British Columbia V3R 6A7, Canada
  • Eastern Canada Cutaneous Research Associates Ltd
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1Z2, Canada
  • Ultranova Skincare
    Barrie, Ontario L4M 6L2, Canada
  • K. Papp Clinical Research
    Waterloo, Ontario N2J 1C4, Canada
  • Innovaderm Research
    Montreal, Quebec H2K 4L5, Canada
  • Centre Dermatologique du Quebec Metropolitain
    Ste-Foy, Quebec G1V 4X7, Canada
  • Kokubu Abashiri Dermatology Clinic
    Abashiri-shi, Hokkaido, 093-0016, Japan
  • Asanuma Dermatology Clinic
    Chitose-shi, Hokkaido, 066-0064, Japan
  • Fukuoka University Hospital Dermatology
    Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
  • Hatamoto Dermatology Clinic
    Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, 815-0075, Japan
  • Tashiro Clinic
    Iizuka-shi, Fukuoka, 820-0040, Japan
  • Kokubu Dermatology
    Kitami-shi, Hokkaido, 090-0832, Japan
  • University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
    Kyoto-City, 602-8566, Japan
  • Kyoto University Hospital
    Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
  • Sapporo Skin Clinic
    Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, 060-0063, Japan
  • NTT Medical Center Tokyo
    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625, Japan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Simpson EL, Imafuku S, Poulin Y, Ungar B, Zhou L, Malik K, Wen HC, Xu H, Estrada YD, Peng X, Chen M, Shah N, Suarez-Farinas M, Pavel AB, Nograles K, Guttman-Yassky E. A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Apremilast in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2019 May;139(5):1063-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.10.043. Epub 2018 Dec 5. PubMed 30528828 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02087943
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 14, 2014
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Oct 2015
Completion
Feb 2016
Results posted
Dec 12, 2016
Last update
May 7, 2020

Study contacts

MD
study director · Amgen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion