CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02085200Updated Mar 12, 2014

Scapular Stabilization During Manual Horizontal Adduction Stretches and Its Effect on Increasing Posterior Shoulder Flexibility

An interventional study of horizontal adduction stretch with scapular stabilization and Horizontal adduction stretch without scapular stabilization in Posterior Shoulder Tightness, sponsored by Nova Southeastern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 15 Years to 21 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-03-12.

Sponsored by Nova Southeastern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 21 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if stabilizing the scapula (shoulder blade) during a common shoulder stretch is more effective at improving shoulder range of motion than not stabilizing the scapula. Investigators hypothesize that scapular stabilization during horizontal adduction stretching will demonstrate greater gains in shoulder range of motion than stretching without scapular stabilization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Posterior Shoulder Tightness

Keywords

  • glenohumeral internal rotation deficit
  • overhead athlete
  • shoulder exercise
  • posterior glenohumeral capsule
  • posteroinferior glenohumeral ligament
  • posterior rotator cuff
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Nova Southeastern University is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • athletes with at least two years of volleyball experience
  • athletes with no current shoulder pain
  • athletes between the ages of 15 and 21
  • athletes with a 10 degree or greater difference in internal rotation between shoulders

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • athletes currently experiencing shoulder pain
  • athletes having less than two years of volleyball experience
  • athletes not meting inclusion criteria
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Horizontal adduction stretch without scapular stabilization

    Scapular stabilization is not provided during a manual horizontal adduction stretch of the shoulder. Each stretch is held for 25 seconds and repeated for a total of 3 times.

    Other: Horizontal adduction stretch without scapular stabilization

  • Other
    Horizontal adduction with scapular stabilization

    Scapular stabilization is provided during a manual horizontal adduction stretch of the shoulder. Each stretch is held for 25 seconds and repeated for a total of 3 times.

    Other: horizontal adduction stretch with scapular stabilization

Interventions

  • Otherhorizontal adduction stretch with scapular stabilization

    Scapular is stabilized during manual horizontal adduction stretch

  • OtherHorizontal adduction stretch without scapular stabilization

    Scapula stabilization is not performed during horizontal adduction stretch

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Posterior Shoulder Tightness

    An inclinometer is used to measure posterior shoulder tightness.

    Time frame: Change from baseline posterior shoulder tightness to immediately following manual stretching. The baseline is measured, followed by 3 stretches held for 25 seconds and then the follow up measure is taken. This is the conclusion of this measure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Internal Rotation

    An inclinometer is used to measure internal rotation

    Time frame: Change from baseline internal rotation to immediately following manual stretching. The baseline is measured, followed by 3 stretches held for 25 seconds and then the follow up measure is taken. This is the conclusion of this measure.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Triangle Volleyball Club Inc.
    Morrisville, North Carolina 27560, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Salamh PA, Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. Effect of scapular stabilization during horizontal adduction stretching on passive internal rotation and posterior shoulder tightness in young women volleyball athletes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Feb;96(2):349-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.038. Epub 2014 Oct 23. PubMed 25450120 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02085200
Lead sponsor
Nova Southeastern University
Collaborators
Southeastern Orthopedics Sports Medicine and Shoulder Center, Triangle Volleyball, Inc.
Responsible party
Paul Salamh (Director of Rehabilitation at Southeastern Orthopedics Sports Medicine and Shoulder Center, Nova Southeastern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2014
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Last update
Mar 12, 2014

Study contacts

Paul A Salamh, PT,DPT,PhD(c)
principal investigator · Nova Southeastern University and Southeastern Orthopedics Sports Medicine and Shoulder Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion