ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02084225Updated Mar 20, 2014

Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthesia for Acute Injury in Low Resource Settings

An observational study in Pain Management and Acute Injuries, sponsored by Salmon, Margaret, M.D.. Status unknown at 3 sites in 2 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-03-20.

Sponsored by Salmon, Margaret, M.D. · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2014), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine feasibility, perceived utility and sustainability of training local providers in ultrasound guided regional anesthesia for acute pain management in a limited-resource conflict setting.

Read the detailed description

To the investigators knowledge, this is the first study of feasibility, perceived utility and sustainability of USRA as a pain management tool in a low-resource conflict setting and is one of the only large studies to date to assess USRA by local providers for emergent pain relief due to injury in patients presenting to an acute care center.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Management
  • Acute Injuries

Keywords

  • low resource
  • conflict setting
  • ultrasound guided regional anesthesia
  • acute injuries
  • pain management
  • education
  • ultrasound
  • trauma
  • emergency department
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

2,217 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 441 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 169 across 690 observational studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Salmon, Margaret, M.D. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants include medical doctors and orthopedic or trauma nurses (officers) who staff the emergency department and/or orthopedic procedure area where acute injuries are treated.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • participants were chosen by hospital administration

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • only chosen participants were included
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Course participants

    Physicians, nurses and orthopedic officers who staff the emergency intake and orthopedic procedure area of HEAL hospital, Goma DRC, Black Lion Hospital, Addis Ababa and Kindu General Hospital in Kindu DRC. These participants recorded their nerve block intervention over one year for pain management and assessed patient pain level after 10 cc lidocaine.

    Procedure: ultrasound guided regional nerve block

Interventions

  • Procedureultrasound guided regional nerve block

    participants were the physicians performing the procedure

    Also known as: lidocaine 1% and 2%

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participant perceived utility of ultrasound guided nerve block

    Participants filled out a data sheet on each block performed. The participant stated yes/no if a block was found to have positive utility

    Time frame: study start - ongoing (24 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participant course satisfaction

    Post course evaluation of course satisfaction and balance of didactic simulation and clinical scanning

    Time frame: at course end (5 days)

Other outcomes

  1. Patient pain reduction (VAS)

    Pain reduction was calculated using 1 - 10 of a VAS. The patients was asked to rate pain before and 20 minutes after the procedure

    Time frame: up to 18 months

  2. Post procedure serious and non serious adverse event

    Patients were followed up to 48 hours post procedure in order to monitor for adverse events including residual nerve sensory deficit and/or infection at the injection site

    Time frame: before and up to 48 hours after every block performed

  3. Indication for use of USRA by participant

    Participants recorded patient indication for offering USRA when presenting with acute injury including burns gun shot wounds lacerations, bone injuries soft tissue injuries and painful dressing changes

    Time frame: up to 18 months of study period

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • HEAL Hospital
    Goma, Congo
  • John Maurice Kikuni Salmu
    Kindu, Congo
  • Black Lion Hospital
    Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02084225
Lead sponsor
Salmon, Margaret, M.D.
Collaborators
Sonosite/Fuji Film - (in kind), The ultrasound for the study was given to the sites by Sonosite/Fuji but the company, had no other role in the study., MedShare - (in kind), The needles and syringes and kit contents were given to the sites by MedShare but the, company had no role in the study.
Responsible party
margaret salmon (Global Health Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Salmon, Margaret, M.D.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2014
Start date
Jan 2012
Primary completion
Oct 2014 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2014 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 20, 2014

Study contacts

Margaret Salmon, MD MPH
principal investigator · HEAL Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion