CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02072707Updated Apr 21, 2020

Efficacy and Safety of Epicardial VT Ablation Using Contact Force Irrigated Tip Catheter - Pilot Study

An interventional study of Epicardial VT ablation and Endocardial VT Ablation in Tachycardia, Ventricular, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-21.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators hypothesized that combined endocardial and epicardial VT ablation using contact sensor irrigated catheter is safe and achieves a lower recurrence rate than endocardial only ablation in ischemic and non-ischemic patients, for this the investigators will randomize 20 patients in two groups, one with endocardial only ablation and other with combined endocardial and epicardial ablation.

Read the detailed description

Pilot Study Design The investigators will select 20 ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with scar related Ventricular tachycardia with indication of VT ablation. After informed consent, these patients will be randomized to endocardial only (Control Group) or combined endocardial and epicardial ablation (Treatment Group).

Inclusion Criteria Patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent sustained monomorphic VT requiring cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drug administration with ≥4 episodes in the previous 6 months despite an ICD or antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Patients without ICD were eligible after 2 episodes of sustained VT.

Exclusion Criteria Creatinine level >2.5mg/dL; LV ejection fraction \<10%; NYHA Class IV; mobile thrombus on LV; absence of vascular access to the LV; life-expectancy of less than 12 months; previous open-chest cardiac surgical procedure; unstable angina; myocardial infarction in the last 2 months; severe aortic stenosis; severe mitral regurgitation secondary to leaflet or chordae rupture; pregnancy and age of less than 18 years old.

Ablation Technique In the patients randomized for combined epicardial and endocardial ablation, subxyphoid puncture will be performed according to previously described technique. Following successful epicardial access on the combined epi and endocardial ablation and following the venous puncture on the endocardial only group, a puncture of femoral artery will be performed. If the patient has peripheral artery disease, the catheter will be positioned on the left ventricle through transeptal puncture.

Electroanatomic voltage map will be constructed of the endocardial and epicardial surface. After map construction, programmed ventricular stimulation of the apex of the RV with S4 extrastimuli will be performed aiming for VT inducibility. If the induced VT is well tolerated, activation mapping of the VT will be constructed in addition to entrainment mapping. If the VT is not hemodynamically tolerated, it will be reverted either by Burst or electrical cardioversion, than substrate modification in the scar combined with pace-mapping and local abnormal electrograms (late potentials) ablation will be performed. In the patients in the endocardial only group, only the endocardial surface of the right or left ventricle will be ablated.

In the combined epicardial and endocardial group, the choice of the surface to be ablated will be guided by the tachycardia mapping (mesodiastolic and pre-systolic potentials), extension of the scar, pace-mapping in both surfaces. ECG criteria suggesting epicardial surface will also be considered to define the epi or endo surface to be ablated.

Following ablation, a repeated programmed ventricular stimulation with S4 will be performed to evaluated reinducibility of the VT. Additional RF applications can be performed according to clinical criteria, and the procedure will be considered terminate when no VT is inducible or by clinical criteria. In the endo only group that endocardial scar could not be observed or following extensive endocardial ablation the clinical VT still remain inducible, and the ECG criteria suggests epicardial VT will underwent epicardial mapping and ablation and this will be considered as a Cross-over.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome:

Safety: The investigators will evaluate the rate of complications related to irrigated tip catheter use on epicardial surface. It is expected that the combined epicardial and endocardial ablation group do not present an increase in the rate of catheter-related complications.

Efficacy: The investigators will evaluate if the procedure was succeeded. The investigators consider success as follows: (1) Complete Success: prevention of induction of any VT following ablation; (2) Partial Success: prevention of induction of the clinical VT, remaining the induction of at least one non-clinical faster VT; (3) Failure: Remaining the induction of the clinical or initially induced VT.

Secondary Outcome:

Safety: The investigators will evaluate the rate of complications related to the epicardial access. It is expected a rate of hemopericardium of no more than 20%, with less than 5% rate of major complications as procedure related death, cardiac surgery due to cardiac perforation or blood cell transfusion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tachycardia, Ventricular

Keywords

  • Ventricular Tachycardia
  • RF ablation
  • Epicardial Access
  • Contact Sensor Irrigated tip catheter
03

In context

Tachycardia

623 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 64 across 379 interventional studies indexed under Tachycardia.

Browse Tachycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent sustained monomorphic VT requiring cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drug administration with ≥4 episodes in the previous 6 months despite an ICD or antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
  • Patients without ICD were eligible after 2 episodes of sustained VT.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Creatinine level >2.5mg/dL
  • LV ejection fraction \<10%
  • NYHA Class IV
  • Mobile thrombus on LV
  • Absence of vascular access to the LV
  • Life-expectancy of less than 12 months
  • Previous open-chest cardiac surgical procedure
  • Unstable angina; myocardial infarction in the last 2 months
  • Severe aortic stenosis
  • Severe mitral regurgitation secondary to leaflet or chordae rupture
  • Pregnancy and age of less than 18 years old.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Epicardial VT ablation

    Patients will underwent combined epicardial and endocardial mapping and ablation

    Procedure: Epicardial VT ablation

  • Active comparator
    Endocardial VT Ablation

    Patients will underwent endocardial only VT mapping and ablation

    Procedure: Endocardial VT Ablation

Interventions

  • ProcedureEpicardial VT ablation

    Combined Epicardial and Endocardial VT Ablation

  • ProcedureEndocardial VT Ablation

    Endocardial Only VT ablation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of epicardial ablation

    We will evaluate if the procedure was succeeded according to reinducibility of ventricular tachycardia. We consider success as follows: (1) Complete Success: prevention of induction of any VT following ablation; (2) Partial Success: prevention of induction of the clinical VT, remaining the induction of at least one non-clinical faster VT; (3) Failure: Remaining the induction of the clinical or initially induced VT.

    Time frame: Programed ventricular stimulation performed 5 minutes after complete ablation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety of epicardial access

    We will evaluate the rate of complications related to the epicardial access.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the procedure

  2. Safety of epicardial ablation using irrigated contact sensor catheter

    We will evaluate the rate of complications related to irrigated tip catheter use on epicardial surface.

    Time frame: At the end of the procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Arrhythmia Clinical Unit - Instituto do Coração - HCFMUSP
    Sao Paulo, SP 05403-000, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pisani CF, Romero J, Lara S, Hardy C, Chokr M, Sacilotto L, Wu TC, Darrieux F, Hachul D, Kalil-Filho R, Di Biase L, Scanavacca M. Efficacy and safety of combined endocardial/epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in Chagas disease: A randomized controlled study. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1510-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 20. PubMed 32087356 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02072707
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Collaborators
Biosense Webster, Inc.
Responsible party
Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca (Arrhythmia Clinical Unit Director, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2014
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Jul 21, 2017
Completion
Jul 21, 2017
Last update
Apr 21, 2020

Study contacts

Maurício Scanavacca, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Instituto do coração - HC/FMUSP

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion