CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT020637763HUpdated Feb 22, 2018

Haemodiafiltration vs Conventional Haemodialysis in Children

An observational study in Children, Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration, sponsored by Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-22.

Sponsored by Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2018), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
5 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Children on conventional haemodialysis (HD) die of heart disease. Also, they can be malnourished and short. Haemodiafiltration (HDF) is a newer type of dialysis that achieves better removal of toxins and excess fluid than HD. On HDF, adults have a longer survival and children show improved growth, but mechanisms are not understood.

We will follow children in the UK and Europe to compare HDF and HD. We will monitor growth, heart and blood vessel scans, blood markers and quality of life. If the 3H (HDF-Hearts-Height) study shows reduced cardiovascular morbidity and better growth, HDF may be adopted as the preferred type of dialysis in children.

Read the detailed description

Background: Children on conventional haemodialysis (HD) have a 1000-fold higher mortality than their healthy peers and can have malnutrition and growth retardation. Haemodiafiltration (HDF) achieves better clearance of uraemic solutes across a wide molecular-weight range and performs greater ultrafiltration than conventional HD. Randomised controlled trials in adults have shown 35-45% improved survival and reduced cardiovascular mortality on HDF with high convection volumes. Excellent catch-up growth has been demonstrated in children on HDF, but mechanisms are poorly understood.

Hypothesis: HDF improves the cardiovascular risk profile, growth and quality of life (QoL) compared to conventional HD. Primary outcome measures are carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and height standard deviation score (SDS).

Plan of investigation: Incident and prevalent patients on HDF or HD who are expected to remain on dialysis for >6-months and who have a single pool Kt/v>1.2 will be compared in a 1:1 study design. Anthropometric measures (height SDS, body mass index SDS) and QoL questionnaires will be monitored at baseline and 6-monthly. Cardiovascular measures (cIMT, pulse wave velocity, left ventricular mass index and 24-hour BP) will be measured annually. 6-monthly blood tests will measure nutritional biomarkers, mineral dysregulation, inflammation and middle-molecule clearance. Outcome measures will be standardised to the convective clearance dose per m2 body surface area. Recruitment will continue for 2½ years with minimum follow-up of 6-months.

Children will be recruited from all UK dialysis units, but small patient numbers (10-12/year) necessitate collaborations with European centres. HDF and HD patients across Europe who are part of the Cardiovascular Comorbidity in Childhood CKD (4C) study will be included and vascular scans will be captured from this study. From ESPN/ERA-EDTA registry data we estimate \~100 children on HDF over the study period.

Outcomes: If the 3H (HDF-Hearts-Height) study shows that HDF reduces cardiovascular morbidity and improves growth it may lead to HDF being adopted as the standard for in-centre dialysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Children
  • Haemodialysis
  • Haemodiafiltration

Keywords

  • Haemodiafiltration (HDF)
  • Haemodialysis (HD)
  • Children
  • Carotid intima media thickness
  • Pulse wave velocity
  • Height standard deviation score
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  • HDF patients will be compared with age-matched HD patients in a 1:1 study design.
  • Children will be recruited from paediatric dialysis units within the UK and also centres in Europe, through the 4C-study.

Inclusion criteria

  1. All children 5 - 21 years age undergoing HDF in paediatric dialysis centres (incident and prevalent patients)
  2. Age-matched HD patients
  3. Prevalent HDF and HD patients must achieve a single pool Kt/v>1.2 in the month preceding recruitment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children in whom a living donor kidney transplant is planned within 6-months of start of dialysis
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Children on HDF
  • Children on conventional HD
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 1. Change in carotid artery intima-media thickness (cIMT) standard deviation score (SDS)

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Change in height SDS

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. For nutritional status 1. Body mass index SDS 2. Markers of appetite regulation and nutritional status

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. For cardiovascular status 1. 24-hour mean arterial BP SDS 2. Left ventricular mass index 3. Pulse wave velocity SDS 4. Biomarkers of cardiovascular disease

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rukshana Shroff
    London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shroff R, Bayazit A, Stefanidis CJ, Askiti V, Azukaitis K, Canpolat N, Agbas A, Anarat A, Aoun B, Bakkaloglu S, Bhowruth D, Borzych-Duzalka D, Bulut IK, Buscher R, Dempster C, Duzova A, Habbig S, Hayes W, Hegde S, Krid S, Licht C, Litwin M, Mayes M, Mir S, Nemec R, Obrycki L, Paglialonga F, Picca S, Ranchin B, Samaille C, Shenoy M, Sinha M, Smith C, Spasojevic B, Vidal E, Vondrak K, Yilmaz A, Zaloszyc A, Fischbach M, Schaefer F, Schmitt CP. Effect of haemodiafiltration vs conventional haemodialysis on growth and cardiovascular outcomes in children - the HDF, heart and height (3H) study. BMC Nephrol. 2018 Aug 10;19(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0998-y. PubMed 30097064 ↗
  • Agbas A, Canpolat N, Caliskan S, Yilmaz A, Ekmekci H, Mayes M, Aitkenhead H, Schaefer F, Sever L, Shroff R. Hemodiafiltration is associated with reduced inflammation, oxidative stress and improved endothelial risk profile compared to high-flux hemodialysis in children. PLoS One. 2018 Jun 18;13(6):e0198320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198320. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29912924 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02063776
Lead sponsor
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2014
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
May 2017
Completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 22, 2018

Study contacts

Rukshana C Shroff, MD FRCPCH PhD
study chair · Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion