CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02062177Propofol TCIUpdated Sep 8, 2014Results posted

Propofol Administered by Gastroenterologists by Target Controlled Infusion Pump During Endoscopy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Propofol and Midazolam in Sedation and Endoscopy, sponsored by Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-08.

Sponsored by Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Many studies address safety of non-anesthesiologist propofol sedation (NAPS) for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) is a sophisticated tool for providing optimal sedation regimen and avoiding under or oversedation. The objective of the study is to compare standard moderate sedation during upper endoscopy and colonoscopy versus propofol NAPS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sedation
  • Endoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age \< 18 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists risk I-II
  • patients undergoing to Gastroscopy or Colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • significant systemic disease
  • allergic reactions to any of study drugs
  • chronic use of opioids or psychiatric disorders
  • pregnancy
  • Mallampati score > 2
  • age \< 18 years
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    propofol group

    70 patients (35 upper endoscopy - 35 colonoscopy)

    Drug: Propofol

  • Active comparator
    midazolam group

    70 patients (35 upper endoscopy - 35 colonoscopy)

    Drug: Midazolam

Interventions

  • DrugPropofol

    70 patients (35 upper endoscopy - 35 colonoscopy) are sedated with propofol TCI (Target Controlled Infusion) pump (concentration 1.2-1.6 mcg/ml).

  • DrugMidazolam

    70 patients (35 upper endoscopy - 35 colonoscopy) in group midazolam are sedated with midazolam 0.04 mg/Kg if aged \< 70, 0.03 mg/Kg if aged \> 70.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Endoscopist's Satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale) About Sedation

    Visual Analog Scale from 0 to100 (0=dissatisfaction - 100=complete satisfaction) will be used to assess the technical difficulty of examination and the satisfaction with sedation of patient experienced by endoscopist

    Time frame: at the end of the exam

  2. Patient's Satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale) About Sedation Before Discharge

    When completely awake, patients will be asked to rate the degree of pain/discomfort and the degree of satisfaction about quality of sedation from 0 to100 (0=dissatisfaction - 100=complete satisfaction)

    Time frame: before discharge

  3. Patient's Satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale) About Sedation 24-72 Hours After Procedure

    Patients will be contacted by telephone 24-72 hours after discharge and asked about their satisfaction about the quality of sedation, rated on a verbal rating scale, from 0 to 100 (0=dissatisfaction; 100=complete satisfaction)

    Time frame: at 24-72 hours after procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time (Minutes) to Dischargeability of Patient From Endoscopic Unit

    After endoscopy, patients will be transferred to recovery area and evaluated every 5 minutes until they will be ready to be discharged from the Endoscopy Unit. Recovery will be assessed using the Modified Aldrete Scoring System; patients will be considered fit for discharge with a Modified Aldrete Scoring System score of 18 or more, stable vital signs and without nausea, vomiting, or itching.

    Time frame: one day

  2. Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety

    Number of patients with adverse events (hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxemia,...)

    Time frame: one day

07

Results

Posted Sep 8, 2014

Participant flow

140 consecutive outpatients were scheduled to undergo Upper Endoscopy (70 patients) or complete Colonoscopy (70 patients) from 17 th February 2014 to 5 th May 2014 in Endoscopy Unit of San Raffaele Hospital - Milan.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePropofol GroupMidazolam Group
Started7070
Completed7070
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryEndoscopist's Satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale) About Sedation

Visual Analog Scale from 0 to100 (0=dissatisfaction - 100=complete satisfaction) will be used to assess the technical difficulty of examination and the satisfaction with sedation of patient experienced by endoscopist

Time frame:
at the end of the exam
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Endoscopist's Satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale) About Sedation
units on a scalePropofol Group; n=35, 35Midazolam Group; n=35, 35
upper endoscopy93 ± 1483 ± 21
colonoscopy98 ± 1187 ± 12
PrimaryPatient's Satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale) About Sedation Before Discharge

When completely awake, patients will be asked to rate the degree of pain/discomfort and the degree of satisfaction about quality of sedation from 0 to100 (0=dissatisfaction - 100=complete satisfaction)

Time frame:
before discharge
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient's Satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale) About Sedation Before Discharge
units on a scalePropofol Group; n=35, 35Midazolam Group; n=35, 35
Upper endoscopy94 ± 1876 ± 25
Colonoscopy95 ± 985 ± 14
PrimaryPatient's Satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale) About Sedation 24-72 Hours After Procedure

Patients will be contacted by telephone 24-72 hours after discharge and asked about their satisfaction about the quality of sedation, rated on a verbal rating scale, from 0 to 100 (0=dissatisfaction; 100=complete satisfaction)

Time frame:
at 24-72 hours after procedure
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient's Satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale) About Sedation 24-72 Hours After Procedure
units on a scalePropofol Group; n=35, 35Midazolam Group; n=35, 35
Upper endoscopy93 ± 2077 ± 27
Colonoscopy97 ± 988 ± 16
SecondaryTime (Minutes) to Dischargeability of Patient From Endoscopic Unit

After endoscopy, patients will be transferred to recovery area and evaluated every 5 minutes until they will be ready to be discharged from the Endoscopy Unit. Recovery will be assessed using the Modified Aldrete Scoring System; patients will be considered fit for discharge with a Modified Aldrete Scoring System score of 18 or more, stable vital signs and without nausea, vomiting, or itching.

Time frame:
one day

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety

Number of patients with adverse events (hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxemia,...)

Time frame:
one day

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Propofol Group; n=35, 35—0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)
Midazolam Group; n=35, 35—0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Propofol GroupMidazolam GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years5557112
>=65 years151328
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Propofol GroupMidazolam GroupTotal
Female303262
Male403878
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Propofol GroupMidazolam GroupTotal
Italy7070140
08

Study locations

1 site
  • San Raffaele Hospital
    Milan, 20132, Italy
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fanti L, Gemma M, Agostoni M, Rossi G, Ruggeri L, Azzolini ML, Dabizzi E, Beretta L, Testoni PA. Target Controlled Infusion for non-anaesthesiologist propofol sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: The first double blind randomized controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Jul;47(7):566-71. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 14. PubMed 25840875 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02062177
Lead sponsor
Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele
Responsible party
Testoni Pier Alberto (Professor, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2014
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
May 2014
Results posted
Sep 8, 2014
Last update
Sep 8, 2014

Study contacts

Pier Alberto Testoni, Professor
study director · Vita-Salute San Raffalele University- San Raffaele Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion