An interventional study of PST - Pulsed Signal Therapy and Placebo - Sham PST in Patella Chondromalacia, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-25.
Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
PST (pulsed signal therapy) is a unique form of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) for stimulating healing of damaged structures such as cartilage, bones and soft tissues. The physical effect of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) has been focus of research in various studies, with cartilage being the most studied, and which has demonstrated an increase in the synthesis of proteoglican and collagen in vitro. This is an randomized, controlled and double blind clinical trial. The main objective is to evaluate clinical improvement regarding anterior knee pain after PST intervention in patients with patellar condropathy.
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Clinical Hospital (Hospital das Clinicas), University of São Paulo (Universidade de São Paulo - USP) under number 0253/11.
This patient population is estimated to a total of 40 knees, with the patients meeting the following inclusion criteria:
The presence of patellofemoral pain is identified by anamnesis and physical examination performed by knee surgeons with more than 10 years' experience. The presence of all of the following criteria is required for diagnosis: typical complaint of anterior knee pain with a duration longer than 3 months (when going up or down stairs, squatting, remaining for long periods with bent knees), pain on palpation of the patellar articular surface and pain on patellar compression (reproducing the patient's complaint).
After inclusion in the study, all of the patients will be instructed (for the duration of the study) not to use drugs with a direct action on the cartilage (e.g., chondroprotectors, such as glucosamine and chondroitin) to avoid confounding biases regarding the effects of the treatments. No patients will be included who had started using these drugs in the previous 6 months to avoid the initial effect of this treatment being a confounder in terms of clinical improvement.
The study is designed so that the patient and the orthopedist evaluating the clinical outcome do not know to which group the patient belongs (i.e., a double-blind study).
After patient inclusion and signing of the terms of free and informed consent, the patients will be randomized by a computer into 2 equal groups, i.e., the control and PST groups. The patients with both knees included in the study will receive randomization for the right knee, and the left will be automatically allocated into the other group. This method was selected to best demonstrate any differences between groups. The final distribution of patients into groups will be therefore not equalized.
PST application will be then directed to the patellofemoral joint. The PST application protocol is as follows: 9 daily 1-hour applications, with 5 in the first week, a break for the weekend, and 4 more the following week.
The control group patients will be submitted to placebo PST treatment with the same protocol and the device connected not generating magnetic pulses. The device operates silently, and it is not possible for the patient to determine whether they are receiving the placebo or treatment, thus maintaining patient blinding. For patients with both knees included, 9 sessions of the treatment are performed on one side and 9 more sessions of the placebo on the other.
All of the participants are instructed to maintain their usual level of physical activity.
The Kujala score will be taken after 3, 6 and 12 months in both groups. If superiority of the PST group is observed, it was decided for ethical reasons that the placebo group should receive the PST treatment and would again be followed up for 1-year post-treatment, with the Kujala score ascertained at 3, 6 and 12 months.
A sample of approximately 20 patients in each group was used for an alpha of 5% and beta of 20%. An effect size of 8 to 10 between groups was sought and is considered clinically significant in terms of Kujala score.
73 studies on the registry are indexed under Cartilage Diseases; 5 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 47 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Cartilage Diseases.
Browse Cartilage Diseases studies →University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.
Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria:
roughly 20 patients will be treated with PST protocol, outcomes will be Kujala score improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Device: PST - Pulsed Signal Therapy
roughly 20 patients will be submitted to a placebo PST protocol, outcomes will be Kujala score improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Device: Placebo - Sham PST
PST application is a painless over-the-skin eletromagnetic field application. 9 sessions of application of electromagnetic therapy - PST - during 60 minutes
Also known as: PST, PEMF, Pulsed Eletromagnetic Field
Placebo PST will be performed by applying the same device over the patient knee. The machine is not applying the PST but it appears to be on. In this way, patients are blinded to the intervation. 9 sessions of application of Sham PST - during 60 minutes
Also known as: Placebo
Clinical improvement - Kujala score
A functional score (Kujala) will be performed before, at 3 months, at 6 months and at one year after PST intervention and placebo.
Time frame: 12 months
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital