CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01998360Updated Oct 2, 2018Results posted

Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision

An interventional study of Surgical Control and Unicirc with tissue adhesive in Circumcision, sponsored by Simunye Primary Health Care. Completed at 1 site in South Africa. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-02.

Sponsored by Simunye Primary Health Care · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate a new, minimally-invasive surgical circumcision technique for men, which is easy to learn and perform, is safe, and is associated with high patient satisfaction and excellent cosmetic results.

Read the detailed description

Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a priority preventive intervention for HIV transmission. Currently, the most widely used VMMC technique in South Africa is open surgical circumcision.

According to the Framework for Clinical Evaluation of Devices for Adult Male Circumcision (WHO, 2011): "WHO and other health authorities wish to identify one or more devices that (a) would make the VMMC safer, easier, and quicker; (b) would have more rapid healing than current methods and/or might entail less risk of HIV transmission in the post-operative period; (c) could be performed safely by health-care providers with a minimal level of training; and (d) would be cost-effective compared to standard surgical methods for male circumcision scale up."

This quasi-experimental compares the open surgical technique to an alternative minimally-invasive technique using the disposable Unicirc device with tissue adhesive. The controls come from a separate randomized controlled trial (Unicirc 001) that was conducted just prior to the Unicirc 002 case series of 50 subjects. The investigators postulate that VMMC using the Unicirc device meets WHO criteria for the ideal method to scale up: it is an easier technique to learn and perform, requires less intraoperative time, is safer for both surgeons and patients, heals quicker, and is more cost effective than other currently available techniques. The disposable nature of the device is an immense advantage as it eliminates the need to sterilize and can therefore be used in resource-limited settings. It also reduces the chances of infection caused by contaminated instruments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Circumcision

Keywords

  • Circumcision
  • Voluntary medical male circumcision
  • Minimally-invasive
  • HIV prevention
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Simunye Primary Health Care is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy men at least 18 years of age requesting circumcision

No anatomical penile abnormalities or infections

Able to provide informed consent to participate

Willing to participate in follow-up visits -

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Current illness

Penile abnormality or infection which contraindicates or would complicate circumcision

History of bleeding disorder

Past reaction to local anesthetic

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Unicirc with tissue adhesive

    Excision of foreskin with Unicirc device and sealing wound with tissue adhesive

    Procedure: Unicirc with tissue adhesive

  • Active comparator
    Surgical control

    Surgical circumcision using forceps guided, dorsal slit, or sleeve method

    Procedure: Surgical Control

Interventions

  • ProcedureSurgical Control

    The study is quasi-experimental, because the open surgical controls are not contemporaneous. They were performed at the same center as part of Unicirc 001 trial with the same conditions as the subsequent 50 Unicirc circumcisions.

  • ProcedureUnicirc with tissue adhesive

    Excision of foreskin with Unicirc device and wound sealing with tissue adhesive

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intraoperative Duration

    The number of minutes required to perform the surgical procedure

    Time frame: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Bleeding, hematoma, infection and other rare adverse events

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Blood Loss

    Number of ml of blood lost during the procedure, as assessed by the surgeon

    Time frame: During procedure (up to 1 hour)

  3. Number of Participants With Complete Epithelialization (Completely Healed) at 4 Weeks

    The number of participants with complete epithelialization (completely healed) at 4 weeks

    Time frame: 1 month

  4. Cosmetic Result

    Regular: scar line straight without any irregularity Irregular: Some irregularity to scar line Scalloped: wavy appearane to scar line

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jan 15, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneUnicirc With Tissue AdhesiveSurgical Control
Started5050
Completed5050
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryIntraoperative Duration

The number of minutes required to perform the surgical procedure

Time frame:
1 hour
Reported as:
Median · Min
Intraoperative Duration
MinUnicirc With Tissue AdhesiveSurgical Control
Intraoperative Duration9.0 (8.5 to 10.0)22.6 (18.4 to 27.0)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events

Bleeding, hematoma, infection and other rare adverse events

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
participantsUnicirc With Tissue AdhesiveSurgical Control
Number of Participants With Adverse Events49
SecondaryBlood Loss

Number of ml of blood lost during the procedure, as assessed by the surgeon

Time frame:
During procedure (up to 1 hour)
Reported as:
Median · ml
Blood Loss
mlUnicirc With Tissue AdhesiveSurgical Control
Blood Loss1.5 (1.5 to 1.5)5.5 (5.5 to 12)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Complete Epithelialization (Completely Healed) at 4 Weeks

The number of participants with complete epithelialization (completely healed) at 4 weeks

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Complete Epithelialization (Completely Healed) at 4 Weeks
participantsUnicirc With Tissue AdhesiveSurgical Control
Number of Participants With Complete Epithelialization (Completely Healed) at 4 Weeks4949
SecondaryCosmetic Result

Regular: scar line straight without any irregularity Irregular: Some irregularity to scar line Scalloped: wavy appearane to scar line

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Cosmetic Result
participantsUnicirc With Tissue AdhesiveSurgical Control
Regular5020
Irregular08
Scalloped022

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Unicirc With Tissue Adhesive—0/50 (0%)4/50 (8%)
Surgical Control—0/50 (0%)9/50 (18%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventUnicirc With Tissue AdhesiveSurgical Control
Post-op infectionInfections and infestations2/506/50
Post-op bleeding or hematomaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/503/50

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Unicirc With Tissue AdhesiveSurgical ControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years5050100
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Unicirc With Tissue AdhesiveSurgical ControlTotal
Female000
Male5050100
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Simunye Primary Healthcare
    Mitchells Plain, Western Cape, South Africa
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01998360
Lead sponsor
Simunye Primary Health Care
Responsible party
Peter Millard (PI, Simunye Primary Health Care) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 28, 2013
Start date
Oct 2013
Primary completion
Oct 2013
Completion
Oct 2013
Results posted
Jan 15, 2014
Last update
Oct 2, 2018

Study contacts

Norman Goldstuck, MB ChB
study director · Simunye Primary Health Care

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion