CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01994759Updated Jul 11, 2018

Optimal Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: Physical Training, Glucocorticoid Injections or a Combination Thereof.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Training and Glucocorticosteroid injection in Plantar Fasciitis, sponsored by Bispebjerg Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-11.

Sponsored by Bispebjerg Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether reduced load to patients with plantar fasciitis (reduced standing, walking, landing) together with either controlled heavy resistance training or glucocorticosteroid injection or a combination thereof is the best treatment.

Read the detailed description

Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a frequently diagnosed condition, defined as pain at the medial tubercle of the calcaneus, and 10% of the population will at some points in their life experience this condition. Accumulated loading of the plantar fascia seems to relate to development of PF, as it is commonly seen in runners and those who are overweight, and number of daily steps or simply time of standing has been shown to be a predisposing factor for PF development.

Orthosis and glucocorticoid injections are 2 widely used treatments with proven effect. However treatment of overuse injury in other tendon/aponeurosis-like structures, has over the later years been dominated by an increasing documentation of a good curative effect of heavy controlled mechanical loading (eccentric strength exercises or heavy slow concentric strength training) upon tendinopathies in Achilles or patella tendon. However, no studies have looked at the influence of physical training (e.g. strength training) on the diseased plantar aponeurosis. Also no studies have looked at the effect of a combination of giving local glucocorticoid injection and training on this or other tendon overuse entities.

We hypothesize that heavy strength training will have a positive effect upon PF, and that a combination of training and glucocorticoid injections will have an additive effect upon this disease and be even more effective than each of the treatments alone. Glucocorticoid injection acting as the standard control treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Plantar Fasciitis

Keywords

  • Plantar fasciitis
  • Treatment
  • Training
  • Glucocorticosteroid injection
03

In context

Fasciitis

235 studies on the registry are indexed under Fasciitis; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 54 across 192 interventional studies indexed under Fasciitis.

Browse Fasciitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Bispebjerg Hospital is the lead sponsor of 281 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Pain at the medial attachment of fascia plantaris.
  • First step pain in the morning
  • Symptoms for at least 3 months.
  • Age 20-65 years
  • Ultrasound scanning at the first visit shows thickness of the fascia above 4 mm.
  • Patient can read and understand danish

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known arthritis, inflammatory bowl disease, psoriasis or clinical signs of any of these
  • Leg ulcerations
  • Longlasting oedema of the leg and foot
  • Palpatory decreased puls in the foot
  • Diabetes
  • Reduced sensibility in the foot
  • Infections in the foot
  • Daily use of pain killers
  • Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant
  • Earlier operations on the foot, that is judged to complicate training
  • Patient assessed not to be able to participate in the training for other reasons
  • Glucocorticosteroid injection to the diseased plantar fascia within the last 6 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Training

    strengthening and stretching exercises.

    Other: Training · Behavioral: Reduction in impact

  • Active comparator
    Glucocorticosteroid injection

    Injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone.

    Drug: Glucocorticosteroid injection · Behavioral: Reduction in impact

  • Active comparator
    Training and Glucocorticosteroid injections

    A combination treatment of the two above.

    Other: Training · Drug: Glucocorticosteroid injection · Behavioral: Reduction in impact

Interventions

  • OtherTraining

    Patients are instructed to carry out strengthening exercises for the fascia plantaris 3 days a week and stretching exercises every day. Four times in the first 2 months supervised training in groups is carried out with a physiotherapist supervising the exercises and instructing in progression and new exercises, and all participants are instructed to carry out a specific training program daily at home. The amount of training performed by each patient, is registered in a diary weekly

    Also known as: Heavy slow resistance exercise, Eccentric training, stretching

  • DrugGlucocorticosteroid injection

    Ultra sound guided injection af 1 ml og Glucocorticosteroid (methylprednisolone 40 mg) and 1 ml of lidocaine 5mg/ml from the medial side profound to the thickened part of the fascia plantaris. Glucocorticosteroid injections are given every month until the aponeurosis thickness is less than 4 mm as determined by ultrasonography (max 3 injections).

    Also known as: Methylprednisolone, Depo-medrol

  • BehavioralReduction in impact

    advocate reduction in standing, walking, running, jumping. advocate shock absorbing shoes advocate prefabricated insoles advocate taping in special occasions.

    Also known as: Shock absorbtion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 100 mm VAS score pain at function. Average pain during everyday living.

    Time frame: 6 month

  2. Foot Function Index

    Foot function Index is a validated score for patients with plantar fasciitis. It consists of 23 questions concerning pain, function and impact on daily life. Each question is answered on a box scale 0-10, giving a score range: 0-230.

    Time frame: 6 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. 100 mm VAS score for morning pain

    Time frame: at entry, 3 month (after intervention), 6 month, 12 month, 24 month

  2. Ultrasound scanning thickness measure

    measurement of the thickness of the thickest part of the fascia by B-mode Ultrasound scanning

    Time frame: at entry, 3 month (after intervention), 6 month, 12 month, 24 month

  3. 100 mm VAS score pain at function. Average pain during everyday living.

    Time frame: 3 months, 12 months, 24 months

  4. Foot Function Index

    Foot function Index is a validated score for patients with plantar fasciitis. It consists of 23 questions concerning pain, function and impact on daily life. Each question is answered on a box scale 0-10, giving a score range: 0-230.

    Time frame: 3 month, 12 month, 24 month

Other outcomes

  1. patient diary

    100 mm VAS score for morning pain (average in the week). 100 mm VAS score for pain at function (average in the week). Compliance to the treatment. Side effects to glucocorticosteroid injections is described.

    Time frame: week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13

  2. Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

    For determining bloodflow of the plantar fascia we inject 2 ml SonoVue®. Ultrasound contrast agent, that amplifies the ultrasound signal. After injection we simultaneously ultrasound scan both feet for 3 minutes. The perfusion of the fascia can hereby bee calculated. Only patients with unilateral plantar fasciitis will bee offered this evaluation.

    Time frame: at entry after 3-4 months and after 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital
    Kobenhavn, 2400, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Baldassin V, Gomes CR, Beraldo PS. Effectiveness of prefabricated and customized foot orthoses made from low-cost foam for noncomplicated plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Apr;90(4):701-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.002. PubMed 19345789 ↗
  • Crawford F, Thomson C. Interventions for treating plantar heel pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD000416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000416. PubMed 12917892 ↗
  • Uden H, Boesch E, Kumar S. Plantar fasciitis - to jab or to support? A systematic review of the current best evidence. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011;4:155-64. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S20053. Epub 2011 May 24. PubMed 21655342 ↗
  • Vohra PK, Kincaid BR, Japour CJ, Sobel E. Ultrasonographic evaluation of plantar fascia bands. A retrospective study of 211 symptomatic feet. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002 Sep;92(8):444-9. doi: 10.7547/87507315-92-8-444. PubMed 12237265 ↗
  • Tobin L, Simonsen L, Bulow J. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound determination of microvascular blood volume in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue in man. Evidence for adipose tissue capillary recruitment. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010 Nov;30(6):447-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.00964.x. Epub 2010 Aug 22. PubMed 20731685 ↗
  • Roos E, Engstrom M, Soderberg B. Foot orthoses for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Aug;27(8):606-11. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700807. PubMed 16919213 ↗
  • Radford JA, Landorf KB, Buchbinder R, Cook C. Effectiveness of low-Dye taping for the short-term treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomised trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Aug 9;7:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-64. PubMed 16895612 ↗
  • Pfeffer G, Bacchetti P, Deland J, Lewis A, Anderson R, Davis W, Alvarez R, Brodsky J, Cooper P, Frey C, Herrick R, Myerson M, Sammarco J, Janecki C, Ross S, Bowman M, Smith R. Comparison of custom and prefabricated orthoses in the initial treatment of proximal plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Apr;20(4):214-21. doi: 10.1177/107110079902000402. PubMed 10229276 ↗
  • Kongsgaard M, Kovanen V, Aagaard P, Doessing S, Hansen P, Laursen AH, Kaldau NC, Kjaer M, Magnusson SP. Corticosteroid injections, eccentric decline squat training and heavy slow resistance training in patellar tendinopathy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Dec;19(6):790-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00949.x. Epub 2009 May 28. PubMed 19793213 ↗
  • Cheng JW, Tsai WC, Yu TY, Huang KY. Reproducibility of sonographic measurement of thickness and echogenicity of the plantar fascia. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012 Jan;40(1):14-9. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20903. Epub 2011 Nov 22. PubMed 22109854 ↗
  • Johannsen FE, Herzog RB, Malmgaard-Clausen NM, Hoegberget-Kalisz M, Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. Corticosteroid injection is the best treatment in plantar fasciitis if combined with controlled training. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):5-12. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5234-6. Epub 2018 Nov 15. PubMed 30443664 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01994759
Lead sponsor
Bispebjerg Hospital
Collaborators
Fonden for Faglig Udvikling af Speciallægepraksis, Denmark
Responsible party
Finn Elkjær Johannsen (chief physician, MD, specialist in Rheumatology, Bispebjerg Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2013
Start date
Sep 1, 2013
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2015
Completion
Dec 1, 2016
Last update
Jul 11, 2018

Study contacts

Michael Kjær, Professor
study chair · University of Copenhagen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion