CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01989468Updated Apr 16, 2019Results posted

24 Week Efficacy and 3-year Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Secukinumab and Placebo in Psoriatic Arthritis, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 77 sites in 13 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-16.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals (part of Novartis) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
414
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to provide 24 - 52 week efficacy, safety and tolerability data, and up to 3-year efficacy, safety and tolerability data in subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis despite current or previous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and/or previous anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psoriatic Arthritis

Keywords

  • Psoriatic arthritis
  • AIN457
  • PsA
  • ACR
  • CASPAR
  • PASDAS
  • secukinumab
  • autoinjector
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 414 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) classified by ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria.
  • Rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies negative.
  • Diagnosis of active plaque psoriasis or nail changes consistent with psoriasis.
  • Inadequate control of symptoms with NSAID.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chest X-ray or chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process.
  • Subjects taking high potency opioid analgesics.
  • Previous exposure to secukinumab or other biologic drug directly targeting interleukin-17 (IL-17) or IL-17 receptor.
  • Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments / medications.
  • Subjects who have ever received biologic immunomodulating agents except for those targeting TNFα.
  • Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
414 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Secukinumab (AIN457) 150 mg s.c.

    1 s.c. Secukinumab 150 mg autoinjector at Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, followed by dosing every four weeks starting at Week 4.

    Biological: Secukinumab

  • Experimental
    Secukinumab (AIN457) 300 mg s.c.

    2 s.c. Secukinumab 150 mg autoinjector at Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, followed by dosing every four weeks starting at Week 4.

    Biological: Secukinumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Matching Placebo at Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, followed by dosing every four weeks starting at Week 4.

    Biological: Placebo

Interventions

  • BiologicalSecukinumab

    Secukinumab 150 mg provided in a 1 mL autoinjector (1 autoinjector for 150 mg dose, 2 autoinjectors for 300 mg dose)

    Also known as: Secukinumab 150 mg, Secukinumab 300 mg

  • BiologicalPlacebo

    Secukinumab placebo provided in 1 mL autoinjector

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

    A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR20 criteria if she/he has at least 20% decrease in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 20% improvements in 3 of the following 5 criteria: physical disability on the Health Assessment Questionnaire; pain score on a visual analog scale; patient global assessment; physician global assessment; and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]

    Time frame: Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

    A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR50 criteria if she/he has at least 50% decreases in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 50% improvements in 3 of the following 5 criteria: physical disability on the Health Assessment Questionnaire; pain score on a visual analog scale; patient global assessment; physician global assessment; and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing hsCRP) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

    DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity based on 28-Swollen and Tender Joint Count \[proximal interphalangeal joints (10 joints) metacarpophalangeal joints (10) wrists (2) elbows (2) shoulders (2) knees (2)\], CRP, and the Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity. Values range from 2.0 to 10.0 where higher values mean a higher disease activity. DAS28-CRP \< 2.6 is interpreted as remission.

    Time frame: Week 24

  3. Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response in Subjects on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

    PASI takes into account the extent of the disease, as well as the severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness in different body areas affected by psoriasis. A PASI75 represents an improvement in the PASI score of at least 75% as compared with baseline.

    Time frame: Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

    SF-36 is a 36 item questionnaire which measures Quality of Life across eight domains, which are both physically and emotionally based. Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) can be computed. In this study, SF-36 PCS is used to assess improvement from baseline of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo. The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.

    Time frame: Week 24

  5. Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

    PASI takes into account the extent of the disease, as well as the severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness in different body areas affected by psoriasis. A PASI90 represents an improvement in the PASI score of at least 90% as compared with baseline.

    Time frame: Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI Score) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

    The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. In this trial, only the disability dimension was used. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing 8 common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from four response categories: 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Within each of the 8 categories, only the item indicating the most severe impairment contributes to the category score. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Week 24

  7. Proportion of Patients With Dactylitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Dactylitis at Baseline

    The presence of dactylitis was assessed by dactylitis count (number of fingers and toes with dactylitis, with a range of 0-20). If dactylitis is present with any finger or toe, the patient is counted as a patient with dactylitis.

    Time frame: Week 24

  8. Proportion of Patients With Enthesitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline

    The presence of Enthesitis was assessed using a validated enthesitis index that uses 6 sites for evaluation of enthesitis: lateral epicondyle humerus L + R, proximal achilles L + R and medial condyle femur. If enthesitis is present at any of the 6 sites, the subject is counted as a subject with enthesitis.

    Time frame: Week 24

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)

    Analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by primary System Organ Class (SOC).

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to last study visit, up to 3 years

07

Results

Posted Apr 16, 2019

Participant flow

Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms (1:1:1) and planned to be treated for 156 weeks. Placebo non-responders had the option to be re-randomized at Week 16 and placebo responders had the option to be re-randomized at Week 24. Thus, of the 137 original placebo patients 64 were re-randomized to AIN457 150 mg and 65 to AIN457 300 mg.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo_AIN457 150 mgPlacebo_AIN457 300 mgPlacebo Not Rerandomized
Started13813964658
Completed9110245490
Not completed473719168
Withdrew: Adverse event1015454
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1111742
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up52011
Withdrew: Physician decision41010
Withdrew: Pregnancy01000
Withdrew: Technical problems31310
Withdrew: Subject guardian decision116441
Withdrew: Death30100

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR20 criteria if she/he has at least 20% decrease in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 20% improvements in 3 of the following 5 criteria: physical disability on the Health Assessment Questionnaire; pain score on a visual analog scale; patient global assessment; physician global assessment; and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24
ParticipantsAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo
Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24586722
SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR50 criteria if she/he has at least 50% decreases in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 50% improvements in 3 of the following 5 criteria: physical disability on the Health Assessment Questionnaire; pain score on a visual analog scale; patient global assessment; physician global assessment; and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24
ParticipantsAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo
Proportion of Patients Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24264812
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing hsCRP) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity based on 28-Swollen and Tender Joint Count \[proximal interphalangeal joints (10 joints) metacarpophalangeal joints (10) wrists (2) elbows (2) shoulders (2) knees (2)\], CRP, and the Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity. Values range from 2.0 to 10.0 where higher values mean a higher disease activity. DAS28-CRP \< 2.6 is interpreted as remission.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Unit on a scale
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing hsCRP) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24
Unit on a scaleAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing hsCRP) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24-1.24 ± 0.095-1.56 ± 0.093-0.64 ± 0.127
SecondaryProportion of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response in Subjects on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

PASI takes into account the extent of the disease, as well as the severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness in different body areas affected by psoriasis. A PASI75 represents an improvement in the PASI score of at least 75% as compared with baseline.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response in Subjects on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24
ParticipantsAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo
Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response in Subjects on Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2434296
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

SF-36 is a 36 item questionnaire which measures Quality of Life across eight domains, which are both physically and emotionally based. Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) can be computed. In this study, SF-36 PCS is used to assess improvement from baseline of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo. The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Unit on a scale
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36-PCS) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24
Unit on a scaleAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo
Mental Component Summary (MCS)1.68 ± 0.8374.41 ± 0.822-0.10 ± 1.142
Physical Component Summary (PCS)3.42 ± 0.6006.46 ± 0.5902.94 ± 0.830
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

PASI takes into account the extent of the disease, as well as the severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness in different body areas affected by psoriasis. A PASI90 represents an improvement in the PASI score of at least 90% as compared with baseline.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24
ParticipantsAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 2425214
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI Score) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24

The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. In this trial, only the disability dimension was used. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing 8 common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from four response categories: 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Within each of the 8 categories, only the item indicating the most severe impairment contributes to the category score. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Unit on a scale
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI Score) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24
Unit on a scaleAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI Score) in Subjects Treated With Secukinumab Versus Placebo at Week 24-0.27 ± 0.043-0.38 ± 0.042-0.17 ± 0.055
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Dactylitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Dactylitis at Baseline

The presence of dactylitis was assessed by dactylitis count (number of fingers and toes with dactylitis, with a range of 0-20). If dactylitis is present with any finger or toe, the patient is counted as a patient with dactylitis.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients With Dactylitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Dactylitis at Baseline
ParticipantsAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo
Proportion of Patients With Dactylitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Dactylitis at Baseline222431
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Enthesitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline

The presence of Enthesitis was assessed using a validated enthesitis index that uses 6 sites for evaluation of enthesitis: lateral epicondyle humerus L + R, proximal achilles L + R and medial condyle femur. If enthesitis is present at any of the 6 sites, the subject is counted as a subject with enthesitis.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients With Enthesitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline
ParticipantsAIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlacebo
Proportion of Patients With Enthesitis at Week 24 in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline605383
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)

Analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by primary System Organ Class (SOC).

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment to last study visit, up to 3 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)
ParticipantsAny AIN457 150 mgAny AIN457 300 mgAny AIN457Placebo
AEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)17623036381
SAEs by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)4235769
Deaths by Primary System Organ Class (SOC)4040

Adverse events

Collected over All Adverse Events (AEs) are reported in this record from date of First Patient First Treatment (FPFT) until end of treatment exposure, up to 156 weeks, + 84 days safety follow-up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Any AIN457 150 mg4/202 (2%)42/202 (20.8%)153/202 (75.7%)
Any AIN457 300 mg0/284 (0%)35/284 (12.3%)201/284 (70.8%)
Any AIN4574/406 (1%)76/406 (18.7%)320/406 (78.8%)
Placebo0/137 (0%)9/137 (6.6%)65/137 (47.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 132
Most frequent serious events
EventAny AIN457 150 mgAny AIN457 300 mgAny AIN457Placebo
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/2021/2844/4060/137
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/2024/2846/4061/137
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders2/2020/2842/4060/137
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations2/2020/2842/4060/137
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/2020/2842/4060/137
Arteriosclerosis coronary arteryCardiac disorders0/2020/2840/4061/137
Atrial flutterCardiac disorders0/2020/2840/4061/137
Atrioventricular block completeCardiac disorders1/2020/2841/4061/137
Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders0/2021/2841/4061/137
Infectious mononucleosisInfections and infestations0/2020/2840/4061/137
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 62
Most frequent other events
EventAny AIN457 150 mgAny AIN457 300 mgAny AIN457Placebo
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations44/20263/284105/40616/137
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations27/20235/28461/4067/137
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders17/20224/28441/4061/137
Psoriatic arthropathyMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders20/20221/28441/4065/137
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders20/20219/28439/4062/137
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders17/20223/28440/4061/137
HeadacheNervous system disorders18/20218/28436/4067/137
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders17/20212/28429/4066/137
BronchitisInfections and infestations11/20223/28434/4066/137
FatigueGeneral disorders16/20210/28426/4062/137

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)AIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlaceboTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years126123118367
>=65 years12161947
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Female777278227
Male616759187
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)AIN457 150 mgAIN457 300 mgPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native2002
Asian2349
White129130133392
Other56011
08

Study locations

77 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Palm Harbor, Florida 34684, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46256, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63117, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Freehold, New Jersey 07728, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Albany, New York 12206, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mesquite, Texas 75150, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wenatchee, Washington 98801, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kogarah, New South Wales 2217, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Maroochydore, Queensland 4558, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Malvern East, Victoria 3145, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1413, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1505, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Veliko Tarnovo, 5000, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Victoria, British Columbia V8V 3M9, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1M3, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Toronto, Ontario M9W 4L6, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Trois Rivieres, Quebec G8Z 1Y2, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bruntal, Czech Republic 792 01, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Praha 2, Czech Republic 128 50, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic 686 01, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Aachen, 52064, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chemnitz, 09130, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Erlangen, 91056, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Gommern, 39245, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hamburg, 20095, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hamburg, 22081, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hamburg, 22415, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hildesheim, 31134, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Magdeburg, 39110, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Zerbst, 39261, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bologna, BO 40138, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Catania, CT 95100, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Genova, GE 16132, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rozzano, MI 20089, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Reggio Emilia, RE 42123, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Torino, TO 10128, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Verona, VR 37126, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Heerlen, 6419 PC, Netherlands
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rotterdam, 3079 DZ, Netherlands
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Caguas, 00725, Puerto Rico
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ponce, 00716, Puerto Rico
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chelyabinsk, 454076, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ekaterinburg, 620028, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Moscow, 115522, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rostov on Don, 344022, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Saratov, 410053, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sestroretsk, 197706, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Yaroslavl, 150003, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sevilla, Andalucia 41009, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Santander, Cantabria 39008, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barcelona, Catalunya 08036, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    La Coruna, Galicia 15006, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fribourg, 1708, Switzerland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    St Gallen, CH 9007, Switzerland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, England E11 1NR, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Salford, Manchester M6 8HD, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cannock, Staffordshire WS11 2XY, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire ST6 7AG, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barnsley, S75 2EP, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Eastbourne, BN21 2UD, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Harrogate, HG2 7SX, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hull, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Manchester, M23 9LT, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Torquay, TQ2 7AA, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tyne And Wear, NE29 8NH, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pournara E, Kormaksson M, Nash P, Ritchlin CT, Kirkham BW, Ligozio G, Pricop L, Ogdie A, Coates LC, Schett G, McInnes IB. Clinically relevant patient clusters identified by machine learning from the clinical development programme of secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis. RMD Open. 2021 Nov;7(3):e001845. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001845. PubMed 34795065 ↗
  • Coates LC, Wallman JK, McGonagle D, Schett GA, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Rasouliyan L, Quebe-Fehling E, Asquith DL, Fasth AER, Pricop L, Gaillez C. Secukinumab efficacy on resolution of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Dec 4;21(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2055-z. PubMed 31801620 ↗
  • Deodhar A, Gladman DD, McInnes IB, Spindeldreher S, Martin R, Pricop L, Porter B, Safi J Jr, Shete A, Bruin G. Secukinumab Immunogenicity over 52 Weeks in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2020 Apr;47(4):539-547. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190116. Epub 2019 Jun 15. PubMed 31203228 ↗
  • Nash P, Mease PJ, McInnes IB, Rahman P, Ritchlin CT, Blanco R, Dokoupilova E, Andersson M, Kajekar R, Mpofu S, Pricop L; FUTURE 3 study group. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab administration by autoinjector in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (FUTURE 3). Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Mar 15;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1551-x. PubMed 29544534 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01989468
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 21, 2013
Start date
Apr 10, 2014
Primary completion
May 27, 2015
Completion
Mar 28, 2018
Results posted
Apr 16, 2019
Last update
Apr 16, 2019

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion