ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01987856Updated May 26, 2016

Idealizing Pregnancy Outcome With Single Blastocyst Transfer in a FET Cycle

An interventional study of Blastocyst morphology in Pregnancy, sponsored by Antalya IVF. Withdrawn at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 39 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-26.

Sponsored by Antalya IVF · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
loss of funding
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 39 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Single embryo transfer (SET) has been advocated as a means of reducing the risk of multiple pregnancies, but has meant a reduction in pregnancy risk per embryo transfer. Embryo aneuploidy has been cited as the primary reason for the low embryo implantation achieved in human IVF. In the majority of IVF programs embryo selection has mainly been based on the microscopic assessments embryo. Culturing embryos to the blastocyst stage as a selection mechanism has seen an increase in implantation rates, presumably indicating that morphologically normal blastocysts formed by day 5 of culture may have a reduced aneuploidy rate. Morphological normality does, however, not completely preclude aneuploidy, with many transferred and cryopreserved embryo bearing factors that may hold an increased risk for implantation failure and miscarriage.

To select the conditions for single blastocyst transfer that will significantly improve reproductive outcomes; increased implantation, reduced pregnancy loss and increased live birth rates.

Read the detailed description

Methodology

Patients: Patients less 40 years of age with a normal ovarian reserve (>10 antral follicle count), normal BMI (>18 and \<30) and who have had no more than 3 previous IVF cycles consulted to have elective single embryo transfer (eSET) will be presented with the conditions of the trial. Patients that accept the conditions of the trial will be randomly allocated to the two groups of the study; Group 1; no blastocysts (N-blastocyst) aneuploidy screened before vitrification and cryostorage, Group 2; patients will have at least 2 blastocysts biopsied for aCGH aneuploidy screening (S-blastocysts) before all blastocysts, are vitrified and cryostored.

Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS): All patients will be stimulated for multiple follicular development using a fixed antagonist protocol with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) and human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG). Final oocyte maturation will be triggered using a bolus dose of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): all oocyte inseminations will be done by ICSI, 2-4 hours after oocyte collection. All resulting 2 pronuclei (PN) zygotes will be cultured to day 5.

Blastocyst scoring and selection; Blastocyst will be scored on 3 criteria; on a scale of 1 (morula/early blastocyst) to 6 (hatched blastocyst) for expansion and on a scale of A to C (A for good, B for fair, and C for poor) for inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) morphology. Patients to be included in the study must have at least 2 blastocysts with expansion grade 3 on day 5 of culture.

Exclusion criteria: All patients with less than 5 oocytes collected at the time of oocyte pickup (OPU) will be excluded from the study. All patients with \<2 blastocysts with expansion grade 3 on day 5 of culture will be excluded from the study.

Vitrification: All suitable blastocyst will be vitrified using the Kitazato cryotop method, a single blastocyst per device.

aCGH: An external laboratory will be used for the screening of the selected blastocyst. All biopsies will be performed on day 5 of culture to remove between 3-5 cells from the TE. Harvested TE cells will be washed placed in a tube, as directed by the genetic laboratory, before being transported to the genetics laboratory.

Frozen embryo transfer (FET): A natural cycle programmed with the use of E2 and P4 supplementation to determine time (progesterone day 6) for blastocyst warming and transfer.

Outcomes measured: pregnancy rate (positive βhCG per blastocyst transfer), implantation rate (fetal sac per blastocyst transfer), ongoing pregnancy rate (fetal heart per blastocyst transfer), single normal live delivery (baby per blastocyst transfer and baby per positive βhCG).

Setting: Antalya IVF It is advised that before attempting to perform embryo aneuploid screening the IVF laboratory should have proven extended embryo (to day 6) culture and embryo vitrification proficiency. At Antalya IVF more than 70% of cycles are extended culture cycles with a more than acceptable implantation rate of 42% for fresh and 44% for vitrified-warmed blastocysts. These reproductive outcomes have been maintained over the last calender year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy

Keywords

  • aCGH
  • chromosome
  • blastocyst
  • trophectoderm
  • vitrification
  • natural cycle
  • pregnancy
  • live birth
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Antalya IVF is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 39 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients less than 40 years of age with a normal ovarian reserve (>10 antral follicle count), normal BMI (>18 and \<30) and who have had no more than 3 previous IVF cycles

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

All patients with less than 5 oocytes collected at the time of OPU will be excluded from the study.

All patients with \<2 blastocysts with expansion grade 3 on day 5 of culture will be excluded from the study.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    aCGH screen

    aCGH screen; euploid blastocyst chosen on 23 plus XY chromosome screening plus blastocyst morphology

    Procedure: Blastocyst morphology

  • Placebo comparator
    Blastocyst morphology

    blastocysts chosen on morphological criteria only; scaled assessment of blastocyst expansion, inner cell mass and trophectoderm morphology

    Procedure: Blastocyst morphology

Interventions

  • ProcedureBlastocyst morphology

    microscopic examination only

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Live birth rate

    single live birth per blastocyst transfer

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pregnancy rate

    the percentage of cycles with a beta human chorionic gonadotropin (βhCG) value of greater than 30 IU on day 14 of cycle

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Ongoing pregnancy rate

    the percentage of cycles with a 7 week ultrasound confirmed fetal heart

    Time frame: 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Euploid rate

    the percentage of biopsied blastocyst that are chromosomally euploid

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Antalya IVF
    Antalya, Antalya 07080, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, Salem SA, Liu X, Lyle SS, Peck AC, Sills ES, Salem RD. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients:results from a randomized pilot study. Molecular Cytogenetics 2012, 5:24 Ly KD, Agarwal A, Nagy ZP. Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo? J Assist Reprod Genet 2011; 28:833-849. Forman EJ,Upham KM, Cheng M, Zhao T, Hong KH, Nathan R. Treff NR, Scott Jr. RT. Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh euploid blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2013; 100 (3): 718-724.
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2014, a primary completion of Dec 2016 and a completion of Sep 2017. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 13, 2013
First posted
Nov 19, 2013
Start
Jan 2014
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2016
CompletionEst.
Sep 2017
Last update
May 26, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01987856
Lead sponsor
Antalya IVF
Responsible party
Kevin Coetzee (Scientific Advisor, Antalya IVF) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 19, 2013
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2016 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2017 (estimated)
Last update
May 26, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion