CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01986062Updated Jul 21, 2020Results posted

Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AR11 in Pediatric Patients With ADHD in a Laboratory Classroom Setting

A Phase 4 interventional study of AR11 and Placebo in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), sponsored by Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-21.

Sponsored by Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
97
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a dose-optimized, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in approximately 100 pediatric patients (aged 6 to 12 years) with ADHD. Eligible patients will enroll to take open-label AR11 BID and undergo dose optimization activities for 8 weeks. Patients who achieve a stable dose during the dose optimization period will continue participation and will be randomized to take double-blind medication (AR11 or placebo) orally twice daily for 1 week. At the end of each double-blind treatment period, patients will be evaluated for ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom setting utilizing SKAMP and PERMP assessments.

Read the detailed description

This is a dose-optimized, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in approximately 100 pediatric patients (aged 6 to 12 years) with ADHD. Eligible patients will enroll in the study to take open-label AR11 twice daily and undergo dose optimization activities for 8 weeks. Patients who achieve a stable dose during the dose optimization period will continue participation and will be randomized to take double-blind medication (AR11 or placebo) orally twice daily for 1 week. At the end of the first double-blind treatment period, patients will be evaluated for ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom setting utilizing SKAMP and PERMP assessments. At the end of the second double blind treatment period, patients will be evaluated for ADHD symptoms in a second laboratory classroom setting utilizing SKAMP and PERMP assessments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Keywords

  • ADHD
  • AR11
  • classroom design
  • amphetamine sulfate
03

In context

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

1,514 studies on the registry are indexed under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 97 is above the median of 72 across 1,207 interventional studies indexed under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity.

Browse Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female between 6 and 12 years of age, inclusive, at the time of Screening.
  2. Diagnosed as meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for ADHD.
  3. A clinician-administered Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) score of 3 or greater.
  4. An ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) score at Screening and Baseline greater than or equal to the 90th percentile normative values for gender and age in at least one of the following categories: hyperactive-impulsive subscale, inattentive subscale, or total score.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Secondary or co-morbid diagnoses other than ADHD, with the exception of simple phobias, oppositional defiant disorder, elimination disorders, motor skills disorders, communication disorders, learning disorders, adjustment disorders, and sleep disorders if, in the opinion of the investigator, the associated symptoms do not confound assessment of safety or efficacy.
  2. Clinically significant cognitive impairment as assessed in the clinical judgment of the Investigator.
  3. History of any of the following medical disorders: seizure disorder (excluding a history of febrile seizures), structural cardiac disorders, serious cardiac conditions, hypertension, untreated thyroid disease, glaucoma, Tourette's disorder, or chronic tics.
  4. Clinically significant abnormal ECG finding or abnormal cardiac finding on physical exam (including presence of a pathologic murmur) at Screening.
  5. Use of any psychotropic medication (sedative hypnotics prescribed as a sleep aid at a stable dose for at least 30 days prior to Baseline, at bedtime only, are allowed during the study).
  6. A history of hypersensitivity or intolerance to any formulation of amphetamine or lisdexamfetamine.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
97 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AR11 (amphetamine sulfate) (1 week) - double blind

    AR11, administered orally, BID, for one week (crossover to placebo administration week 2)

    Drug: AR11

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo (1 week) - double blind

    Placebo, administered orally, BID, for one week (crossover to AR11 administration week 2)

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugAR11

    Also known as: amphetamine sulfate

  • DrugPlacebo

    Also known as: matching Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. SKAMP-Combined Scores

    Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale \[SKAMP\]-combined scores measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom, comprised of 13 items on which subjects are rated according to a 7 point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment); maximum score 78. The SKAMP-combined score is obtained by summing the rating values for each of the 13 items, whereby the higher the SKAMP score, the greater the impairment.

    Time frame: 2 hours post-dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. SKAMP-Combined Scores

    Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale \[SKAMP\]-combined scores measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom, comprised of 13 items on which subjects are rated according to a 7 point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment); maximum score 78. The SKAMP-combined score is obtained by summing the rating values for each of the 13 items, whereby the higher the SKAMP score, the greater the impairment.

    Time frame: 0.75, 4, 6, 8, 10 hours post-dose

  2. SKAMP Subscale - Attention Scores

    The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms. It is comprised of 13 items (grouped under the subcategories of attention, deportment, quality of work, and compliance) on which subjects are rated according to a 7-point scale (0 = normal to 6 = maximal impairment). The SKAMP-Attention subscale score is comprised of four of the 13 items with a maximum score of 24.

    Time frame: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose

  3. SKAMP Subscale - Deportment Scores

    The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms. It is comprised of 13 items (grouped under the subcategories of attention, deportment, quality of work, and compliance) on which subjects are rated according to a 7-point scale (0 = normal to 6 = maximal impairment). The SKAMP-Deportment subscale score is comprised of four of the 13 items with a maximum score of 24.

    Time frame: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose

  4. PERM-P Scores - Number of Problems Attempted

    Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) assessments measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The PERMP is an individualized, five-page math exam consisting of 400 problems. Subjects are instructed to complete as many math problems as possible in 10 minutes. Performance is evaluated using the number of problems attempted (maximum score = 400) and the number of problems correct (maximum score = 400).

    Time frame: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose

  5. PERM-P Scores - Number of Problems Correct

    Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) assessments measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The PERMP is an individualized, five-page math exam consisting of 400 problems. Subjects are instructed to complete as many math problems as possible in 10 minutes. Performance is evaluated using the number of problems attempted (maximum score = 400) and the number of problems correct (maximum score = 400).

    Time frame: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose

07

Results

Posted Apr 19, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAR11 (1 Week) Then Placebo (1 Week) - Double BlindPlacebo (1 Week) Then AR11 (1 Week) - Double Blind
Started4750
Completed4649
Not completed11
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimarySKAMP-Combined Scores

Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale \[SKAMP\]-combined scores measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom, comprised of 13 items on which subjects are rated according to a 7 point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment); maximum score 78. The SKAMP-combined score is obtained by summing the rating values for each of the 13 items, whereby the higher the SKAMP score, the greater the impairment.

Time frame:
2 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SKAMP-Combined Scores
units on a scaleAR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)Placebo
SKAMP-Combined Scores10.0 ± 8.2417.8 ± 1.94
Statistical analysis
  • AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001
SecondarySKAMP-Combined Scores

Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale \[SKAMP\]-combined scores measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom, comprised of 13 items on which subjects are rated according to a 7 point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment); maximum score 78. The SKAMP-combined score is obtained by summing the rating values for each of the 13 items, whereby the higher the SKAMP score, the greater the impairment.

Time frame:
0.75, 4, 6, 8, 10 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SKAMP-Combined Scores
units on a scaleAR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)Placebo
0.75 hours post-dose11.8 ± 10.5617.3 ± 11.38
4 hours post-dose11.6 ± 10.0419.8 ± 11.92
6 hours post-dose14.5 ± 10.3820.2 ± 11.28
8 hours post-dose16.0 ± 11.7622.0 ± 12.33
10 hours post-dose16.5 ± 11.0820.8 ± 13.33
Statistical analysis
  • AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001
SecondarySKAMP Subscale - Attention Scores

The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms. It is comprised of 13 items (grouped under the subcategories of attention, deportment, quality of work, and compliance) on which subjects are rated according to a 7-point scale (0 = normal to 6 = maximal impairment). The SKAMP-Attention subscale score is comprised of four of the 13 items with a maximum score of 24.

Time frame:
0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SKAMP Subscale - Attention Scores
units on a scaleAR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)Placebo
0.75 hours post-dose2.2 ± 2.643.4 ± 3.06
2.0 hours post-dose1.9 ± 2.263.4 ± 3.1
4.0 hours post-dose2.2 ± 2.684.0 ± 3.04
6.0 hours post-dose2.3 ± 2.433.6 ± 2.95
8.0 hours post-dose2.8 ± 2.84.1 ± 3.01
10.0 hours post-dose3.2 ± 3.154.0 ± 3.59
Statistical analysis
  • AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001
SecondarySKAMP Subscale - Deportment Scores

The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms. It is comprised of 13 items (grouped under the subcategories of attention, deportment, quality of work, and compliance) on which subjects are rated according to a 7-point scale (0 = normal to 6 = maximal impairment). The SKAMP-Deportment subscale score is comprised of four of the 13 items with a maximum score of 24.

Time frame:
0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SKAMP Subscale - Deportment Scores
units on a scaleAR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)Placebo
0.75 hours post-dose2.1 ± 3.533.9 ± 4.82
2.0 hours post-dose1.6 ± 2.794.0 ± 4.58
4.0 hours post-dose2.1 ± 3.474.7 ± 4.86
6.0 hours post-dose3.1 ± 4.214.3 ± 4.51
8.0 hours post-dose3.5 ± 4.384.9 ± 4.8
10.0 hours post-dose3.1 ± 3.724.9 ± 5.21
Statistical analysis
  • AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001
SecondaryPERM-P Scores - Number of Problems Attempted

Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) assessments measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The PERMP is an individualized, five-page math exam consisting of 400 problems. Subjects are instructed to complete as many math problems as possible in 10 minutes. Performance is evaluated using the number of problems attempted (maximum score = 400) and the number of problems correct (maximum score = 400).

Time frame:
0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · number of problems attempted
PERM-P Scores - Number of Problems Attempted
number of problems attemptedAR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)Placebo
0.75 hours post-dose111.6 ± 53.5391.2 ± 47.35
2.0 hours post-dose113.4 ± 51.2785.7 ± 46.66
4.0 hours post-dose113.2 ± 56.2885.1 ± 45.89
6.0 hours post-dose101.3 ± 54.2674.9 ± 43.08
8.0 hours post-dose98.2 ± 56.1176.4 ± 47.74
10.0 hours post-dose95.2 ± 55.5376.3 ± 45.27
Statistical analysis
  • AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001
SecondaryPERM-P Scores - Number of Problems Correct

Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) assessments measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The PERMP is an individualized, five-page math exam consisting of 400 problems. Subjects are instructed to complete as many math problems as possible in 10 minutes. Performance is evaluated using the number of problems attempted (maximum score = 400) and the number of problems correct (maximum score = 400).

Time frame:
0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · number of problems correct
PERM-P Scores - Number of Problems Correct
number of problems correctAR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)Placebo
0.75 hours post-dose104.5 ± 54.4983.9 ± 46.96
2.0 hours post-dose107.1 ± 53.1578.9 ± 44.62
4.0 hours post-dose107.0 ± 57.4679.9 ± 45.56
6.0 hours post-dose95.6 ± 55.4370.5 ± 43.23
8.0 hours post-dose92.7 ± 57.2871.5 ± 47.43
10.0 hours post-dose89.9 ± 55.2972.3 ± 45.19
Statistical analysis
  • AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001

Adverse events

Collected over AE reporting occurred during the 8-week open label treatment phase (i.e. AR11 dose optimization) and the 2-week double blind phase (i.e. crossover period). Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AR11—0/97 (0%)19/97 (19.6%)
Placebo—0/97 (0%)6/97 (6.2%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAR11Placebo
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/970/97
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders3/970/97
Upper abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders3/970/97
TachycardiaCardiac disorders2/973/97
Mood swingsPsychiatric disorders2/970/97
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/972/97
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/970/97
Decreased weightInvestigations2/971/97

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AR11 (1 Week) Then Placebo (1 Week) - Double BlindPlacebo (1 Week) Then AR11 (1 Week) - Double BlindTotal
Mean9.6 ± 1.979.6 ± 1.789.6 ± 1.86
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AR11 (1 Week) Then Placebo (1 Week) - Double BlindPlacebo (1 Week) Then AR11 (1 Week) - Double BlindTotal
Female182038
Male293059
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AR11 (1 Week) Then Placebo (1 Week) - Double BlindPlacebo (1 Week) Then AR11 (1 Week) - Double BlindTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American132033
White302858
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported325
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)AR11 (1 Week) Then Placebo (1 Week) - Double BlindPlacebo (1 Week) Then AR11 (1 Week) - Double BlindTotal
United States475097
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC.
    Bradenton, Florida 34201, United States
  • Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC
    Maitland, Florida 32751, United States
  • Miami Research Associates
    South Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Inc.
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89128, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • Bayou City Research Ltd.
    Houston, Texas 77007, United States
  • Westex Clinical Investigations
    Houston, Texas 79423, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Childress AC, Brams M, Cutler AJ, Kollins SH, Northcutt J, Padilla A, Turnbow JM. The Efficacy and Safety of Evekeo, Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate, for Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: A Multicenter, Dose-Optimized, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Laboratory Classroom Study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jun;25(5):402-14. doi: 10.1089/cap.2014.0176. Epub 2015 Feb 18. PubMed 25692608 ↗
  • Childress AC, Newcorn JH, Cutler AJ. Gender Effects in the Efficacy of Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1370-1387. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00942-5. Epub 2019 Apr 10. PubMed 30972657 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01986062
Lead sponsor
Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 18, 2013
Start date
Dec 2013
Primary completion
May 2014
Completion
May 2014
Results posted
Apr 19, 2016
Last update
Jul 21, 2020

Study contacts

Laurence Downey, MD
study director · Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion