CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01966354OISO-1Updated Aug 1, 2016Results posted

Comparison of Three Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Cannulation

An interventional study of Ultrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach in Ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Cannulation and Central Venous Access Complications, sponsored by Mikel Batllori. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-01.

Sponsored by Mikel Batllori · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of three ultrasound assistance techniques for internal jugular venous cannulation, in terms of cannulation success and prevention of complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Cannulation
  • Central Venous Access Complications

Keywords

  • adult
  • catheterization, central venous
  • ultrasonography, interventional
  • evidence-based medicine
  • cost-benefit analysis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Mikel Batllori as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 or older
  • Indication for internal jugular venous cannulation, previously established by the doctor responsible for the patient´s hospital diagnosis and treatment
  • Informed consent for trial participation has been obtained from the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infection signs at or close to puncture site
  • Cutaneous erosions or subcutaneous haematoma at or close to puncture site
  • History of internal jugular venous cannulation during the past 72 hours (in the same side in which the present cannulation is taking place)
  • History of previous surgical interventions on the cannulation site
  • Recent cervical trauma with present neck immobilization and without having ruled out eventual cervical spinal injury
  • Severe coagulopathy (altered coagulation parameters and active bleeding) which cannot be promptly corrected by platelet, fresh frozen plasma or pharmacologic intervention
  • Subcutaneous emphysema with cervical extension
  • Agitated or uncooperative patient (including deep sedation)
  • Inability to obtain formal informed consent from the patient or his legally authorized representative (in case the patient is legally incompetent to give informed consent)
  • Cannulation being performed outside the surgical area or the post-anesthesia care unit
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
220 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Long axis, in-plane needle

    Ultrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach Long axis, in-plane needle: Jugular vein is ultrasonographically visualized in a longitudinal fashion (long axis) and the needle is inserted in the same ultrasound plane, aligned with the longitudinal axis of the transducer.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach

  • Experimental
    Short axis, out-of-plane needle

    Ultrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach Short axis, out-of-plane needle: Jugular vein is ultrasonographically visualized in a transverse fashion (short axis) and the needle is inserted perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the transducer (out-of-plane).

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach

  • Experimental
    Oblique axis, in-plane needle

    Ultrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach Oblique axis, in-plane needle: Jugular vein is ultrasonographically visualized in an oblique axis (intermediate view between long and short axis) and the needle is inserted in the same ultrasound plane, aligned with the longitudinal axis of the transducer.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound-guided Internal jugular venous approach

    The physician will use an ultrasound machine to perform an ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous cannulation: the needle and the vein will be visualized in real time in the ultrasound image to make the cannulation process easier and safer. In each one of three study arms, however, the ultrasound approach will be different depending on the axis on wich the vein is visualized (longitudinal, transversal or oblique) and the way the needle enters the ultrasound plane (in-plane or out of plane).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cannulation Success

    Cannulation will be considered as "successful" once a flexible guidewire has been inserted into the internal jugular vein during the first 180 seconds from the moment the Seldinger needle pierces the skin. If time spent until guidewire insertion is more than 180 seconds, or if guidewire cannot be inserted into the internal jugular vein chosen, cannulation will be considered "unsuccessful". This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process.

    Time frame: At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Cannulation Attempts

    Number of cannulation attempts that have taken place before cannulation success. Any withdrawal of the needle followed by an advance will be considered a separated cannulation attempt.This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process.

    Time frame: At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)

  2. First Attempt Cannulation

    Any cannulation that has been accomplished with a single cannulation attempt will be considered a "first attempt cannulation". This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process.

    Time frame: At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)

  3. Cannulation Time

    Time elapsed (seconds) from the moment the Seldinger needle pierces the skin to the moment the guidewire is inserted inside the vein. This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process.

    Time frame: At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)

  4. Mechanical Complications

    The incidence of the following mechanical complications will be registered: number of patients with accidental arterial puncture, number of patients with puncture site bleeding, number of patients with puncture site haematoma, number of patients with pneumothorax, number of patients catheter tip misplacement. This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process, and once a control chest x-Ray has been performed.

    Time frame: At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)

  5. Infectious Complications

    The incidence of bacterial catheter colonization and catheter-related blood stream infection will be registered once the central venous catheter has been withdrawn. Patients will be followed for the duration of central venous access, an expected average of 8 weeks. The number of patients with bacterial colonization and catheter-related blood stream infection will be registered.

    Time frame: Once the central venous catheter is withdrawn (2 months)

07

Results

Posted Jun 28, 2016
Limitations and caveats
Results may be only extrapolative to experienced cannulators

Participant flow

The day before IJVC was to be performed, patients (aged 18 or above) in whom IJVC had been indicated were asked to participate in the study. Patients who did not meet any exclusion criteria were included.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLong Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane Needle
Started757372
Completed757372
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryCannulation Success

Cannulation will be considered as "successful" once a flexible guidewire has been inserted into the internal jugular vein during the first 180 seconds from the moment the Seldinger needle pierces the skin. If time spent until guidewire insertion is more than 180 seconds, or if guidewire cannot be inserted into the internal jugular vein chosen, cannulation will be considered "unsuccessful". This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process.

Time frame:
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Cannulation Success
participantsLong Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane Needle
Cannulation Success737168
SecondaryNumber of Cannulation Attempts

Number of cannulation attempts that have taken place before cannulation success. Any withdrawal of the needle followed by an advance will be considered a separated cannulation attempt.This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process.

Time frame:
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
Reported as:
Mean · attempts
Number of Cannulation Attempts
attemptsLong Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane Needle
Number of Cannulation Attempts1.92 ± 1.361.51 ± 0.971.37 ± 0.84
SecondaryFirst Attempt Cannulation

Any cannulation that has been accomplished with a single cannulation attempt will be considered a "first attempt cannulation". This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process.

Time frame:
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
Reported as:
Number · participants
First Attempt Cannulation
participantsLong Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane Needle
First Attempt Cannulation395153
SecondaryCannulation Time

Time elapsed (seconds) from the moment the Seldinger needle pierces the skin to the moment the guidewire is inserted inside the vein. This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process.

Time frame:
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Cannulation Time
secondsLong Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane Needle
Cannulation Time46.1 ± 36.335.0 ± 23.441.2 ± 23.9
SecondaryMechanical Complications

The incidence of the following mechanical complications will be registered: number of patients with accidental arterial puncture, number of patients with puncture site bleeding, number of patients with puncture site haematoma, number of patients with pneumothorax, number of patients catheter tip misplacement. This outcome measure will be registered at the end of the cannulation process, and once a control chest x-Ray has been performed.

Time frame:
At the end of the cannulation process (180 seconds, maximum)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Mechanical Complications
participantsLong Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane Needle
Mechanical Complications3115
SecondaryInfectious Complications

The incidence of bacterial catheter colonization and catheter-related blood stream infection will be registered once the central venous catheter has been withdrawn. Patients will be followed for the duration of central venous access, an expected average of 8 weeks. The number of patients with bacterial colonization and catheter-related blood stream infection will be registered.

Time frame:
Once the central venous catheter is withdrawn (2 months)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Infectious Complications
participantsLong Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane Needle
Infectious Complications200

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Long Axis, In-plane Needle—2/75 (2.7%)5/75 (6.7%)
Short Axis, Out-of-plane Needle—0/73 (0%)11/73 (15.1%)
Oblique Axis, In-plane Needle—0/72 (0%)5/72 (6.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLong Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane Needle
Catheter-related blood stream infectionInfections and infestations2/750/730/72
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLong Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane Needle
Posterior internal jugular venous wall punctureVascular disorders0/758/731/72
Local cervical haematomaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/751/732/72
Catheter misplacementVascular disorders2/750/732/72
Puncture site bleedingBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/752/730/72

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Long Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane NeedleTotal
Mean64 ± 13.664.9 ± 13.665.2 ± 15.064.7 ± 14.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Long Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane NeedleTotal
Female26282983
Male494543137
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Long Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane NeedleTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0000
White757372220
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Long Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane NeedleTotal
Spain757372220
Cannulated IJV diameter (cm)
Cannulated IJV diameter (cm)(centimeters (cm))Long Axis, In-plane NeedleShort Axis, Out-of-plane NeedleOblique Axis, In-plane NeedleTotal
Mean1.23 ± 0.31.20 ± 0.31.10 ± 0.21.20 ± 0.3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Anesthesiology department
    Pamplona, Navarra 31008, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Eisen LA, Narasimhan M, Berger JS, Mayo PH, Rosen MJ, Schneider RF. Mechanical complications of central venous catheters. J Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):40-6. doi: 10.1177/0885066605280884. PubMed 16698743 ↗
  • Maecken T, Grau T. Ultrasound imaging in vascular access. Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5 Suppl):S178-85. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260629.86351.A5. PubMed 17446777 ↗
  • Karakitsos D, Labropoulos N, De Groot E, Patrianakos AP, Kouraklis G, Poularas J, Samonis G, Tsoutsos DA, Konstadoulakis MM, Karabinis A. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R162. doi: 10.1186/cc5101. PubMed 17112371 ↗
  • Milling TJ Jr, Rose J, Briggs WM, Birkhahn R, Gaeta TJ, Bove JJ, Melniker LA. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: the Third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) Trial. Crit Care Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1764-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000171533.92856.e5. PubMed 16096454 ↗
  • Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, Thomas S. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361. PubMed 12919984 ↗
  • Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Markowitz AJ. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001;(43):i-x, 1-668. PubMed 11510252 ↗
  • Hessel EA 2nd. Con: we should not enforce the use of ultrasound as a standard of care for obtaining central venous access. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Oct;23(5):725-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.06.020. No abstract available. PubMed 19789059 ↗
  • Augoustides JG, Cheung AT. Pro: ultrasound should be the standard of care for central catheter insertion. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Oct;23(5):720-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Aug 15. No abstract available. PubMed 19686963 ↗
  • Blaivas M, Adhikari S. An unseen danger: frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needles during attempts to place internal jugular vein central catheters using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med. 2009 Aug;37(8):2345-9; quiz 2359. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a067d4. PubMed 19531950 ↗
  • Moon CH, Blehar D, Shear MA, Uyehara P, Gaspari RJ, Arnold J, Cukor J. Incidence of posterior vessel wall puncture during ultrasound-guided vessel cannulation in a simulated model. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17(10):1138-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00869.x. PubMed 21069895 ↗
  • Stone MB, Moon C, Sutijono D, Blaivas M. Needle tip visualization during ultrasound-guided vascular access: short-axis vs long-axis approach. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;28(3):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.11.022. Epub 2010 Jan 28. PubMed 20223394 ↗
  • Chittoodan S, Breen D, O'Donnell BD, Iohom G. Long versus short axis ultrasound guided approach for internal jugular vein cannulation: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Med Ultrason. 2011 Mar;13(1):21-5. PubMed 21390339 ↗
  • Phelan M, Hagerty D. The oblique view: an alternative approach for ultrasound-guided central line placement. J Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;37(4):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.02.061. Epub 2008 Oct 1. PubMed 18829208 ↗
  • Batllori M, Urra M, Uriarte E, Romero C, Pueyo J, Lopez-Olaondo L, Cambra K, Ibanez B. Randomized comparison of three transducer orientation approaches for ultrasound guided internal jugular venous cannulation. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Mar;116(3):370-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev399. Epub 2015 Dec 24. PubMed 26705350 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01966354
Lead sponsor
Mikel Batllori
Collaborators
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Responsible party
Mikel Batllori (Mikel Batllori Gaston, MD, Fundacion Miguel Servet) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2013
Start date
Mar 2012
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Results posted
Jun 28, 2016
Last update
Aug 1, 2016

Study contacts

Mikel Batllori, MD
study director · Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Anesthesiology department

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion