An interventional study of Structured daily diary in HIV Infection, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 16 Years to 24 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-28.
Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
This protocol explores the feasibility and acceptability of using two daily diary methods to analyze state-dependent variables and psychosocial health outcomes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive young men who have sex with men (YMSM). The study will explore the potential of diaries for use in feedback-based interventions.
4,340 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 240 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 67 is below the median of 83 across 3,312 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.
Browse HIV Infections studies →University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,366 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.
Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (88%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
HIV-1 infection as documented in the participant's medical record by at least one of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Group A participants are randomized the IVR system as Modality #1. After 33 days of diary completion using IVR, they switch to the interactive web response system (IWR)as Modality #2.
Behavioral: Structured daily diary
Group B participants are randomized to the IWR system as Modality #1. After 33 days of diary completion using IWR, they switch to the interactive voice response (IVR)system as Modality #2.
Behavioral: Structured daily diary
The intervention is a structured daily diary to describe fluctuations in key psychological and behavioral variables impacting daily risk behavior among HIV-positive young men who have sex with men (YMSM), aged 16 to 24 years old who engage in substance use and sexual risk behaviors.
Number of Participants who Complete the 66-Day Structured Daily Diary
The first primary objective of this study is to implement a 66-day structured daily diary with 90 HIV-positive YMSM to explore relationships among daily mood, stressful events, social support, substance use, sexual behavior, and adherence to ART among youth who are currently prescribed to take medication.
Time frame: 66 days
Rate of Completion of 66-Day Structured Daily Diary by Modality Type
The second primary objective is to explore the feasibility and acceptability of using two daily diary modalities (IVR and IWR) as (1) a novel method of data collection in research involving HIV-positive YMSM, and (2) a potential tool to provide personalized feedback and/or assist with self-monitoring among HIV-positive YMSM.
Time frame: 66 days
Reasons and Rate of for Non-completion of 66-Day Structured Daily Diary
The second primary objective is to explore the feasibility and acceptability of using two daily diary modalities (IVR and IWR) as (1) a novel method of data collection in research involving HIV-positive YMSM, and (2) a potential tool to provide personalized feedback and/or assist with self-monitoring among HIV-positive YMSM.
Time frame: 66 days
Participant Responses to how Diary can Provide Personalized Feedback on Triggers to Risk Behaviors
The secondary objective of this study is to obtain feedback from HIV-positive YMSM on how the diary could be used to provide personalized feedback on triggers to risk behaviors, such as substance use, unprotected sexual behavior, and poor medication adherence. These data will be obtained through debriefing interviews.
Time frame: 66 days
The record gives a start of Feb 2013, a primary completion of Feb 2014 and a completion of Feb 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill →