A Phase 2 interventional study of Docetaxel and Gemcitabine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), sponsored by PharmaMar. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-24.
Sponsored by PharmaMar · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
A clinical study of lurbinectedin(PM01183) alone or in combination with gemcitabine in comparison to docetaxel for the treatment of unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)patients
A randomized-controlled, three-arm, phase II study of lurbinectedin (PM01183) alone or in combination with gemcitabine and a control arm with docetaxel as second-line treatment in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)patients to evaluate the antitumor activity as progression-free survival at four months (PFS4) of PM01183 alone or in combination with gemcitabine as using single agent docetaxel as a reference in the control arm as current standard of care and to analyze overall survival (OS), overall survival rate at 1-year (OS12), duration of response (DR), antitumor activity, as response rate (RR), safety and efficacy profiles of PM01183 alone and in combination with gemcitabine, to be preliminary compared with docetaxel, patients' quality of life (QoL), pharmacokinetics (PK) of PM01183, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD)correlation and pharmacogenomics (PGx)to explore potential correlations between clinical outcomes and molecular parameters found in tumor and blood samples
7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 69 is above the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.
Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →PharmaMar is the lead sponsor of 50 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
75 mg/m2 docetaxel day 1, 1-hour intravenous, every three weeks
Drug: Docetaxel
3.2 mg/m2 PM01183, day 1, 1-hour intravenous, every three weeks
Drug: Lurbinectedin (PM01183)
800 mg/m2 gemcitabine / 1.6 mg/m2 PM01183 both on day 1 and day 8, 30-minutes gemcitabine/1-hour PM01183 intravenous, every three weeks
Drug: Gemcitabine · Drug: Lurbinectedin (PM01183)
Powder for solution for infusion
Powder for solution for infusion
Powder for concentrate for solution for infusion
Progression-free Survival Rate at Four Months (PFS4)
The rate estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and progression-free at 16 weeks (\~4 months) after randomization. Progession disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: At month four after patient inclusion
Progression-free Survival
PFS, progression-free survival Progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of PD, death (of any cause), or last tumor evaluation. Progession disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: Time from the date of randomization to the date of PD, death (of any cause), or last tumor evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years
Progression-free Survival Rate at Six Months (PFS6)
The rate estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and progression-free at 24 weeks (\~6 months) after randomization. Progession disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: At month six after patient inclusion
Overall Response Rate
Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of patients with a response, either CR or PR, according to RECIST v.1.1. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: Time from the date of randomization until 30±7 days after the last treatment infusion, assessed up to 3 years
Objective Response Per RECIST v.1.1
RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10mm Partial Response (PR) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum diameters Progressive Disease (PD) At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm. Appearance of new lesions was considered PD Stable Disease (SD) Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study Treatment failure (TF) Symptomatic deterioration/death due to progression or treatment discontinuation due to treatment-related toxicity occurred before any appropriate tumor assessments had been performed
Time frame: Time from the date of randomization until 30±7 days after the last treatment infusion, assessed up to 3 years
Duration of Response
Duration of response (DR) was defined as the time from the date when the response criteria (PR or CR, whichever was reached first) were fulfilled, to the first date when PD, recurrence or death was documented. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: The time from the date when the response criteria (PR or CR, whichever was reached first) were fulfilled, to the first date when PD, recurrence or death was documented, up to 3 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS) will be defined as time from the date of first infusion to the date of death or last contact
Time frame: From the date of first infusion to the date of death or last contact, up to 12 months after last patient inclusion
Information on Quality of Life (QoL)
The mean QoL scores self-reported by patients using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at baseline and after the start of the therapy in visits 3 or 6 (+/- 1 visit) and visit 9 for those patients in maintenance therapy. Higher LCSS scores indicate more severe problems and the scale range is (0-100) Total score was calculated as the mean of the total scores of all nine patient ítems (Appetite, Fatigue, Cough, Dyspnea, Hemoptysis, Pain, Lung cancer symptoms, Normal activities, Global QoL)
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 3 (~9 weeks), Cycle 6 (~18 weeks) and Cycle 9 (~27 weeks)
69 patients were enrolled between 11/09/2013 and 2/10/2015 at 13 centers. 68 patients were treated: 22 in Arm A, 21 in Arm B, and 25 in Arm C. The first dose of the first cycle was administered on 17/09/2013 and the last dose of the last cycle was administered on 3/11/2016. The last patient, last follow-up was on 24/11/2016
| Milestone | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 22 | 22 | 25 |
| Completed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 22 | 22 | 25 |
| Withdrew: Progressive disease | 12 | 13 | 10 |
| Withdrew: Treatment-unrelated ae | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Study termination | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Physician decision | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Non-treatmentrelated death | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Withdrew: No treated | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Treatment-related ae | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Withdrew: Consent withdrawn by subject | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Treatment-related death | 0 | 2 | 0 |
The rate estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and progression-free at 16 weeks (\~4 months) after randomization. Progession disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
| percentage of participants | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival Rate at Four Months (PFS4) | 27.3 (10.7 to 50.2) | 15.8 (3.4 to 39.6) | 26.1 (10.2 to 48.4) |
PFS, progression-free survival Progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of PD, death (of any cause), or last tumor evaluation. Progession disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
| months | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival | 3.1 (1.8 to 4) | 1.9 (1.5 to 3) | 3.3 (1.9 to 5.7) |
The rate estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and progression-free at 24 weeks (\~6 months) after randomization. Progession disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
| percentage of participants | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival Rate at Six Months (PFS6) | 18.2 (2.1 to 34.3) | 16.7 (0 to 33.9) | 17.5 (0 to 35.2) |
Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of patients with a response, either CR or PR, according to RECIST v.1.1. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
| percentage of participants | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Response Rate | 9.1 (1.1 to 29.2) | 0 (0 to 17.6) | 17.4 (5.0 to 38.8) |
RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10mm Partial Response (PR) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum diameters Progressive Disease (PD) At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm. Appearance of new lesions was considered PD Stable Disease (SD) Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study Treatment failure (TF) Symptomatic deterioration/death due to progression or treatment discontinuation due to treatment-related toxicity occurred before any appropriate tumor assessments had been performed
| Participants | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PR | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| SD | 10 | 7 | 11 |
| PD | 8 | 8 | 6 |
| TF | 2 | 4 | 2 |
Duration of response (DR) was defined as the time from the date when the response criteria (PR or CR, whichever was reached first) were fulfilled, to the first date when PD, recurrence or death was documented. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
| months | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration of Response | 1.2 (0.8 to 1.6) | — | 6.1 (2.0 to NA) |
Overall survival (OS) will be defined as time from the date of first infusion to the date of death or last contact
| months | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | 9.4 (3.1 to NA) | 5.5 (3.0 to 8.0) | 7.2 (4.5 to 10.6) |
The mean QoL scores self-reported by patients using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at baseline and after the start of the therapy in visits 3 or 6 (+/- 1 visit) and visit 9 for those patients in maintenance therapy. Higher LCSS scores indicate more severe problems and the scale range is (0-100) Total score was calculated as the mean of the total scores of all nine patient ítems (Appetite, Fatigue, Cough, Dyspnea, Hemoptysis, Pain, Lung cancer symptoms, Normal activities, Global QoL)
| units on a scale | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 27.2 (18.4 to 36.1) | 36.4 (25.0 to 47.7) | 38.1 (27.7 to 48.5) |
| Cycle 3 | 29.5 (14.5 to 44.5) | 32.2 (19.5 to 44.9) | 36.4 (25.4 to 47.5) |
| Cycle 6 | 24.3 (17.4 to 31.1) | 55.4 (NA to NA) | 35.4 (-11.7 to 82.5) |
| Cycle 9 | — | 38.1 (-74.8 to 151.1) | — |
Collected over Participants were assessed through study completion, approximately 3 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| A - Docetaxel | 14/22 (63.6%) | 12/22 (54.5%) | 21/22 (95.5%) |
| B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | 17/21 (81%) | 9/21 (42.9%) | 20/21 (95.2%) |
| C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | 21/25 (84%) | 18/25 (72%) | 25/25 (100%) |
| Event | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PneumoniaInfections and infestations | 3/22 | 0/21 | 4/25 |
| Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 2/22 | 3/21 | 1/25 |
| NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/22 | 1/21 | 3/25 |
| ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/22 | 1/21 | 3/25 |
| Platelet count decreasedInvestigations | 0/22 | 2/21 | 1/25 |
| Septic shockInfections and infestations | 2/22 | 0/21 | 0/25 |
| Asthenia/FatigueGeneral disorders | 0/22 | 0/21 | 2/25 |
| Cardiac failureCardiac disorders | 0/22 | 0/21 | 2/25 |
| Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/22 | 0/21 | 2/25 |
| ShockVascular disorders | 0/22 | 1/21 | 0/25 |
| Event | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asthenia/FatigueGeneral disorders | 16/22 | 16/21 | 17/25 |
| AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 3/22 | 7/21 | 15/25 |
| NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 4/22 | 3/21 | 13/25 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 2/22 | 6/21 | 13/25 |
| Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 2/22 | 10/21 | 8/25 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 2/22 | 8/21 | 6/25 |
| CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 8/22 | 5/21 | 4/25 |
| DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 8/22 | 5/21 | 7/25 |
| PyrexiaGeneral disorders | 7/22 | 5/21 | 7/25 |
| Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders | 0/22 | 6/21 | 3/25 |
69 patients were enrolled between 11/09/2013 and 2/10/2015 at 13 centers. 68 patients were treated: 22 in Arm A, 21 in Arm B, and 25 in Arm C. The first dose of the first cycle was administered on 17/09/2013 and the last dose of the last cycle was administered on 3/11/2016. The last patient, last follow-up was on 24/11/2016
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 15 | 10 | 13 | 38 |
| >=65 years | 7 | 12 | 12 | 31 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 61.5 (49 to 72) | 65 (46 to 74) | 64 (41 to 75) | 63 (41 to 75) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 5 | 5 | 9 | 19 |
| Male | 17 | 17 | 16 | 50 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race — Caucasian | 21 | 22 | 25 | 68 |
| Race — Unknown | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Italy | 8 | 11 | 13 | 32 |
| Belgium | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Spain | 12 | 8 | 12 | 32 |
| ECOG PS(Participants) | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS 0 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 27 |
| PS 1 | 16 | 11 | 15 | 42 |
| Histology type(Participants) | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-squamous-cell | 17 | 18 | 19 | 54 |
| Squamous-cell | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14 |
| Not specified | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Histology grade(Participants) | A - Docetaxel | B - Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | C - Gemcitabine + Lurbinectedin (PM01183) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Well differentiated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Moderately differentiated | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| Poorly differentiated | 7 | 3 | 9 | 19 |
| Unknown | 13 | 13 | 15 | 41 |
15 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
PharmaMar