CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01950702Updated Oct 24, 2014

Laryngoscope Asssited Lightwand Intubation

An interventional study of Laryngoscope assisted lightwand intubation and Lightwand intubation in Cervical Spine Surgery, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-10-24.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2014), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the success rate for intubation of laryngocope assisted lightwand intubation.

Read the detailed description

Light wand intubation is well known for safety intubation in cervical injury patiets. Traditional method of using light wand can damage the supraglottic cavity by scooping the apparatus. The investigators try to evaluate the efficacy of laryngoscope assisted light wand intubation compared to traditional method of using light wand alone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Spine Surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,860 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient scheduled for cervical spine surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • congenital or acquired abnormalities of the upper airway, tumours, polyps, trauma, abscesses, inflammation, or foreign bodies in the upper airway
  • history of gastro-esophageal reflux disease, previous airway surgery, an increased risk of aspiration, coagulation disorders
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥ 3
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
168 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Lightwand intubation

    After standard total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil continuous infusion, traditional lightwand intubation was done by pre-specified anesthesiologist who experienced more than 100 times of lightwand intubation. Patient's head were fixed at neutral position during all intubation period.

    Procedure: Lightwand intubation

  • Experimental
    Laryngoscope assisted lightwand intubation

    After standard total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil continuous infusion, lightwand intubation using specific device(Macintosh laryngosope, female:3/Male:4) was done by pre-specified anesthesiologist who experienced more than 100 times of laryngoscope assisted lightwand intubation.

    Procedure: Laryngoscope assisted lightwand intubation

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaryngoscope assisted lightwand intubation

    After standard monitoring(EKG, pulse oximetry, NIBP), participants were induced with remifentanil and propofol continuous infusion, using targe-controlled infusion device with prexoygenation with 100% oxygen. Manual in-line stabilization was applied with velcro during intubation to maintain neutral head position. The Macintosh laryngoscope (female: 3rd blade, male: 4th blade) was inserted into the oral cavity to provide direct view of the epiglottis and then the tip of the lightwand was placed below the epiglottis.

    Also known as: The Macintosh laryngoscope (female: 3rd blade, male: 4th blade), lightwand (Surch-Lite, Aaron Medical Industries, St. Petersburg, FL)

  • ProcedureLightwand intubation

    After standard monitoring(EKG, pulse oximetry, NIBP), participants were induced with remifentanil and propofol continuous infusion, using targe-controlled infusion device with prexoygenation with 100% oxygen. Manual in-line stabilization was applied with velcro during intubation to maintain neutral head position. After 2min from administration of rocuronium, the clinician holds the wand similar to a pencil, stands directly behind the patient's head, inserts the device into the side of the mouth and sweeps the tip to the midline. After confirmation of precise location via clear light source on anterior neck, endotracheal tube was inserted and withdrawn lightwand.

    Also known as: Surch-Lite, Aaron Medical Industries, St. Petersburg, FL

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The success rate of intubation

    confirm the success intubation via end tidal CO2 measurement

    Time frame: up to 60 seconds

Secondary outcomes

  1. lightwand search (=intubation) time

    Check the time(sec) from insertion of the lightwand or laryngoscopy into the oral cavity to push the endotracheal tube into the trachea.

    Time frame: from the insertion of the lightwand or laryngoscope into the oral cavity to the point of transillumination over the cricothyroid membrane within 60 sec.

  2. The times of scooping of lightwand

    Within 1min after insertion of lightwand into oral cavity, check the scooping time of lightwand during intubation.

    Time frame: within 1min after insertion of lightwand

Other outcomes

  1. score of postoperative sorethroat

    check the postoperative sorethroat at PACU in each patient. Numeric rating scale(NRS) was used to measure the severity of pain 0 to 10.

    Time frame: at postanesthetic care unit (PACU) within 1hr after end of anesthesia

  2. Incidence of moderate to severe postoperative sorethroat

    check the postoperative sorethroat \>3 at PACU in each patient. Numeric rating scale(NRS) was used to measure the severity of pain 0 to 10. 0-3 : mild 4-7 : moderate 8-10 : severe

    Time frame: at postanesthetic care unit (PACU) within 1hr after end of anesthesia

  3. other possible postoperative complications

    tinged blood to endotracheal tube or in oral cavity. hoarseness

    Time frame: just after extubation, an expected average of 1hr

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Seoul National University of Hospital
    Seoul, Jongno-Gu 110-799, Korea, Republic of
    • Hee-Pyung Park, MD PhD · Contact · hppark@snu.ac.kr · 82-2-2072-2466
    • Eugene Kim, MD · Contact · tomomie@hanmail.net · 82-2-2072-2469
    • Hee-Pyung Park, MD · Principal investigator
    • Eugene Kim, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01950702
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Responsible party
Hee-Pyoung Park (professor, Seoul National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2014 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2014 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 24, 2014

Study contacts

Hee-Pyung Park, MD PhD
Contact
hppark@snu.ac.kr
82-2-2072-2466
Eugene Kim, MD
Contact
tomomie@hanmail.net
82-2-2072-2469
Hee-Pyung Park, MD PhD
study director · Professor
Eugene Kim, MD
principal investigator · fellow

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion