CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01945957Updated Apr 25, 2017

Brain Imaging of Intranasal Oxytocin Treatment in Autism

A Phase 1 interventional study of Oxytocin in Autism Spectrum Disorders, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-25.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Phase 1, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 4 part study:

Phase 1a. -functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) ( with oxytocin 24 IU vs. placebo = oxytocin 0 IU) - funded by grant #U54 HD079124-01, Phase 1b-eye-tracking(oxytocin 24 IU vs. placebo = oxytocin 0 IU), Phase 2a. fMRI (oxytocin 8 IU vs. oxytocin 40IU), Phase 2b. -eye-tracking (oxytocin 8IU vs. oxytocin 40IU). Time course of effect will also be assessed within session.

Read the detailed description

We hypothesize that intranasal oxytocin treatment (OT) of individuals with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) will:

Hypothesis 1a. will produce greater increases in Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA) and Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) activation during social reward anticipation compared to placebo, providing evidence that OT increases activation in brain regions critical for social motivation. (NICHD funding for this section/aim- Dr. Joe Piven -U54 HD079124-01)

Hypothesis 1b. will spend proportionally more time attending to the social image on a screen vs. the non-social image compared to placebo.

Hypothesis 2a. will produce differential effects in VTA and NAc activation during social reward anticipation compared with the oxytocin 8 IU vs. oxytocin 40 IU dose, providing evidence that OT dose-dependently increases activation in brain regions critical for social motivation.

Hypothesis 2b. will differentially attend to the social image on a screen vs. the non-social image compared in the oxytocin 8 IU vs. oxytocin 40 IU dose, providing evidence that OT dose-dependently changes the value of social stimuli.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorders

Keywords

  • autism
  • brain
  • functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • oxytocin
03

In context

Autistic Disorder

1,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 334 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33 is below the median of 45 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Between 6 and 18 years of age, inclusive
  • Have a clinical diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder confirmed according to the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale (ADOS, Lord et al., 1989). Diagnosis may also be confirmed using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R).
  • Male or female of any race or ethnicity
  • Ambulatory status (outpatient) at time of assent/consent
  • Estimated IQ greater than or equal to 70 and capable of making an informed decision based on assessment of their understanding and judgment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurological injury: head trauma, poorly-controlled seizure disorder (i.e. seizure within the preceding six month period), stroke, prior neurosurgery, or under the care of a neurologist or neurosurgeon as determined by interview
  • History of claustrophobia
  • Implanted medical devices, implanted metal debris, shrapnel, certain tattoos, or permanent makeup that is contraindicated for MRI. Participants fill out a detailed questionnaire on the day of scanning to identify potential MRI risks
  • Subjects with a medical condition that might interfere with the conduct of the study, confound interpretation of the study results, or endanger their own well-being. This includes, but is not limited to: Rett Syndrome, impairment of renal function, evidence or history of malignancy or any significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular (including any rhythm disorder or uncontrolled hypertension), respiratory, hepatic, or gastrointestinal disease
  • Marked sensory impairment such as deafness or blindness that would interfere with the conduct of the study
  • Pregnant or nursing because of the unknown effects of oxytocin to unborn babies and/or nursing infants. All females of child-bearing potential will be administered a serum pregnancy test at screening and at any point during the study at physician discretion. Refusal to undergo a pregnancy test will result in exclusion from the study. We will share results of a pregnancy test with the subject's legal guardian.
  • Refusal to do pregnancy testing with understanding that guardian will be informed of positive test results
  • Inability or refusal of sexually active female subjects (who have begun menses) to utilize two medically accepted barrier forms of birth control
  • Use of hormonal birth control
  • Subjects who have a history of an anaphylactic reaction from prior treatment with oxytocin (nasal spray)
  • Inability of caretakers to speak English
  • Absence of a consistent caretaker to report on symptoms
  • Subjects who, in the Investigator's opinion, might not be suitable for the study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OT (24 IU)

    Phase I Aim 1a. (fMRI) Will determine the effect of oxytocin dose (24 IU) on neural activation and connectivity compared to placebo. Aim 1 b (eye-tracking) will occur on a separate visit from fMRI scanning and will also assess response to oxytocin in an eye-tracking task (social vs. non-social image).

    Drug: Oxytocin

  • Experimental
    OT (8 IU and 40IU)

    Each phase will require a separate subject consent. Phase II Aim 2a. (fMRI) Will determine the effect of oxytocin dose (8 or 40 IU) on neural activation and connectivity. Aim 1 b (eye-tracking) will occur on a separate visit from fMRI scanning and will also assess response to oxytocin (8 or 40 IU) in an eye-tracking task (social vs. non-social image).

    Drug: Oxytocin

Interventions

  • DrugOxytocin

    For Phase I, subjects will be randomized to receive either 24IU (6 sprays) of active oxytocin or 6 sprays of placebo (3 sprays per nostril) For Phase II, subjects will be randomized to receive either 8 IU or 40 IU of oxytocin.

    Also known as: Syntocinon

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Aim 1a. fMRI Activation Analysis/Connectivity

    Activation data will be analyzed using FEAT within FSL (Oxford University, U.K.). Onset times of events will be used to model BOLD signal responses containing a regressor for each response type convolved with a double-γ function. A priority region of interest will be the VTA and NAc which will be analyzed via anatomically defined ROI's. Connectivity Analysis:Time series will be extracted from ROIs using FSL Featquery for each participant and averaged separately for each Treatment (OT, placebo) and Trial Type (rewarded, unrewarded) condition (seed and target regions will be functionally defined on the basis of task response). Correlation coefficients will be transformed using a Fisher r-to z transformation. Mean z-transformed values will then be computed across participants and ROI pairs, and then converted back to correlation coefficients.

    Time frame: 30, 75 minutes post dose

  2. Aim 1b. Proportion of Time Attending to Social Stimuli (Eye Tracking)

    The eye tracking task involves the participant looking at a series of images in which a person's face occupies ½ the screen and a complex object occupies the other half of the screen that are presented for \~20 seconds each on a computer monitor. The participant is only told to look at the screen and sits approximately 18-24 inches in front of a computer monitor with built in cameras and lights to track eye movement. This is referred to as competitive attention task to social and nonsocial stimuli. Eye tracking will be assessed via a Tobii 1750 eye tracker or via mobile eye tracking, immediately after the fMRI scan, participants will participate in a 10 min lab-based eye tracking task in which a series of paired social and nonsocial stimuli are displayed for 10 seconds.

    Time frame: pre dose and then 30, 60,120-240 minutes post dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Plasma Oxytocin (OT) levels in aim 1b. and 2b.

    We will assay plasma oxytocin levels using standard radioimmuno assays to describe potential relationships between baseline levels, salivary oxytocin and fMRI activity. Total Volume of Blood = 7ml per time point (one 7ml lavender top tube).

    Time frame: pre dose and then 30, 120, 240 and 360 minutes post dose

  2. Salivary Oxytocin (OT) levels for all aims.

    We plan to collect salivary at times that coincide with the administration of the fMRI task. This data will be used to describe potential relationships between baseline levels, salivary oxytocin and fMRI activity. Collection involves inserting a cotton swab in the subjects mouth and be asked to keep it there for up to 5 minute to ensure total saturation of the swab.

    Time frame: pre dose and then 30, 60, 120-240 minutes post dose for aims 1b, 2b. predose, 25min and 95 min post dose for aims 1a, 2a.

  3. SRS-Social Responsiveness Scale

    Social symptom severity will be measured with the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).

    Time frame: at the scanner visit and eye-tracking visit

  4. Pervasive Developmental Disorders Behavior Inventory-Screening Version (PDDBI-SV)

    Social symptom severity will also be assessed with the PDDBI-SV

    Time frame: at the scanner visit and eye-tracking visit

  5. ABC-lethargy/social withdrawal subscale

    Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) lethargy/social withdrawal subscale

    Time frame: at the scanner visit and eye-tracking visit

Other outcomes

  1. Caregivers will complete the Hollingshead Two-Factor Index of Social Position (only if not done previously in trial), the Repetitive Behavior Scale (revised), and the other subscales of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist

    to further characterize participants with regard to socioeconomic status, lower-order and higher-order repetitive behaviors, and other problem behaviors, respectively

    Time frame: at the scanner visit and eye-tracking visit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27517, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01945957
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Duke University, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2013
Start date
Sep 2014
Primary completion
Jan 2017
Completion
Jan 2017
Last update
Apr 25, 2017

Study contacts

Gabriel Dichter, PhD
principal investigator · The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Duke University
Allen Song, PhD
principal investigator · Duke University
Linmarie Sikich, MD
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion