CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01944462PPVPUpdated Jan 3, 2018Results posted

Impact and Cost of a Pharmacist Pneumococcal Vaccination Program With PNEUMOVAX® 23 at an Urban Senior Center

A Phase 4 interventional study of Pharmacist Pneumococcal Vaccine Program (PPVP) in Study is Open to Seniors Age 50 or Older, sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-03.

Sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
203
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall goals of this program are to measure the impact of a pharmacist pneumococcal vaccine education program (PPVP) using a senior center model of care and provide the pneumococcal vaccine to eligible participants.

Hypotheses

  1. PPVP will result in improved knowledge and awareness in older minorities in the senior center setting (primary hypothesis);
  2. Participants who are vaccinated through the project will experienced increased trust in receiving vaccines from a pharmacist;
  3. Participants will be satisfied with and trust the PV information provided by pharmacists in the PPVP;
  4. PPVP is an efficient approach to educating patients in the senior center based on its costs;
  5. Participating pharmacists will be activated to implement PPVP learnings in their practice.
02

Conditions studied

  • Study is Open to Seniors Age 50 or Older

Keywords

  • pneumococcal vaccine
  • pharmacist vaccination
  • Pneumovax 23
  • pneumococcal vaccine polyvalent
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 384 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 44 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (45%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

A. Inclusions for PPVP:

  1. Age ≥ 50 years old
  2. Can attend a 1.5-hour session at CIP
  3. Cognitively intact based on responses to an Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) of ≥7 (see Appendix for AMTS instrument)
  4. Can speak and read English at ≥4th grade level as evidenced by ability to read a brief passage
  5. Access to a telephone

B. Inclusions to receive the optional pneumococcal vaccination:

Patient meets ≥1 of the following criteria for receiving their first pneumococcal vaccination:

  1. All adults age 65 years and older who have not had the vaccine previously
  2. Age 50-64 years with any of the following conditions:

    1. Cigarette smokers age 19 years and older
    2. Chronic cardiovascular disease (e.g., congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathies; excluding hypertension)
    3. Chronic pulmonary disease (including COPD and emphysema, and for adults ages 19 years and older, asthma)
    4. Diabetes mellitus
    5. Alcoholism
    6. Chronic liver disease, cirrhosis
    7. Candidate for or recipient of cochlear implant
    8. Functional or anatomic asplenia (e.g., sickle cell disease, splenectomy)
    9. Immunocompromising conditions or on immunosuppressive therapy
    10. Chronic renal failure or nephrotic syndrome

OR

Patient meets ≥1 of the following criteria for receiving a booster dose of the pneumococcal vaccination:

  1. Adults age 65 years and older who received their first dose for any indication when they were younger than age 65 years.
  2. Adults age 50-64 who have not received the vaccine for ≥5 years and have one of the following conditions:

    1. Functional or anatomic asplenia (including persons with sickle cell disease or splenectomy patients);
    2. Chronic renal failure (including dialysis patients) or nephrotic syndrome;
    3. Immunocompromising conditions or on immunosuppressive therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

A. Exclusions to the PPVP program: none

B. Exclusions to receiving the optional pneumococcal vaccine:

  1. Participant has a history of allergic reaction to pneumococcal vaccine
  2. Participant has a history of allergic reaction to any component of any vaccine
  3. Participant with moderate or severe illness (these individuals will be advised to speak to their doctor regarding the vaccine)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
203 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pharmacist Pneumococcal Vaccine Program (PPVP)

    Individuals receiving the PPVP intervention which consists of the educational program delivered on site at the collaborating senior center.

    Behavioral: Pharmacist Pneumococcal Vaccine Program (PPVP)

Interventions

  • BehavioralPharmacist Pneumococcal Vaccine Program (PPVP)

    1.5 hour educational intervention delivered onsite at collaborating senior center consisting of 3 components: presentation about pneumococcal disease and the vaccine given by a infectious disease-certified pharmacist; 2) skits given by volunteer actors at the senior center to illustrate real world scenarios related to pneumococcal disease and the vaccine; 3) action planning to consist of small group breakouts led by licensed pharmacists and 4) vaccination day which is an optional component following the education program, for participants eligible to receive the vaccine. Vaccination to be provided free of charge to eligible participants who opt to receive it.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Knowledge and Awareness of Pneumococcal Disease

    Change in knowledge and awareness of pneumococcal disease over time were assessed for the following domains: susceptibility to infection, symptoms of disease, severity of illness, and vaccination with an emphasis on vaccine efficacy, safety, and eligibility. Assessments at baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), and 3 months using the Pneumonia Knowledge Questionnaire, an instrument developed by investigators to assess participants' knowledge and awareness in the domains of interest. Instrument consists of 5 "mark all that apply" items and one "mark the best response" item. Scores range from 0 (no correct responses) to 28 (all responses correct), with a higher score value corresponding to better knowledge and awareness.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test, 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Trust in Pharmacists as Vaccine Providers

    Trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers were measured by comparing responses to the trust items in the baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), and 3-month assessments. Trust items were coded on a 4-level Likert scale, with lower values corresponding to higher agreement with the trust statements (therefore a lower mean response indicates greater trust). Minimum possible score was 1 (indicating complete trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers) and maximum possible score was 4 (indicating complete lack of trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers).

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), 3 months

  2. Activation

    Activation was measured as number of participants having taken action at 3 months or planning action at baseline, post-test, and 3 months.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Satisfaction With PPPP

    Satisfaction with PPPP was measured as participants' overall satisfaction with the content of PPPP, extent to which the participant felt engaged, and belief that the program helped them learn about pneumonia and the vaccination.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Intervention Cost

    Measures PPPP intervention costs per participant. Consists of total program costs divided by number of participants. Value reported is the per-participant cost with measure type "number".

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Pharmacist Satisfaction

    Pharmacists who participated in the intervention were surveyed to determine their satisfaction with the program, including: 1) satisfaction with live action skit, 2) belief that PPPP was successful in educating participants, 3) belief that PPPP was successful in building trust in pharmacists among participants, 4) belief that PPPP was successful in increasing acceptance of pharmacists as immunizers, and 5) belief that PPPP will decrease barriers to vaccination among participants.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 3, 2018

Participant flow

Recruitment and program coordination were completed from January to November 2014, through partnerships with local churches and senior centers.

PPPP Educational Program
Participant flow — PPPP Educational Program
MilestonePPPP Participants
Started203
Baseline203
Post-test187
3 month follow-up143
Completed143
Not completed60
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up60
Optional Vaccination
Participant flow — Optional Vaccination
MilestonePPPP Participants
Started20
Completed20
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryKnowledge and Awareness of Pneumococcal Disease

Change in knowledge and awareness of pneumococcal disease over time were assessed for the following domains: susceptibility to infection, symptoms of disease, severity of illness, and vaccination with an emphasis on vaccine efficacy, safety, and eligibility. Assessments at baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), and 3 months using the Pneumonia Knowledge Questionnaire, an instrument developed by investigators to assess participants' knowledge and awareness in the domains of interest. Instrument consists of 5 "mark all that apply" items and one "mark the best response" item. Scores range from 0 (no correct responses) to 28 (all responses correct), with a higher score value corresponding to better knowledge and awareness.

Time frame:
Baseline, post-test, 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Knowledge and Awareness of Pneumococcal Disease
scores on a scalePPPP Participants
Baseline knowledge score (max score 28)13.90 ± 6.725
Post-test knowledge score (max score 28)20.41 ± 6.254
3 month knowledge score (max score 28)21.43 ± 4.524
SecondaryTrust in Pharmacists as Vaccine Providers

Trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers were measured by comparing responses to the trust items in the baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), and 3-month assessments. Trust items were coded on a 4-level Likert scale, with lower values corresponding to higher agreement with the trust statements (therefore a lower mean response indicates greater trust). Minimum possible score was 1 (indicating complete trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers) and maximum possible score was 4 (indicating complete lack of trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers).

Time frame:
Baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Trust in Pharmacists as Vaccine Providers
units on a scalePPPP Participants
Baseline1.79 ± 0.51
Post-Test1.55 ± 0.47
3 Months1.80 ± 0.43
SecondaryActivation

Activation was measured as number of participants having taken action at 3 months or planning action at baseline, post-test, and 3 months.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Activation
ParticipantsPPPP Participants
Actions taken at 3 months77
Actions planned at baseline41
Actions planned at post-test91
Actions planned at 3 months27
SecondarySatisfaction With PPPP

Satisfaction with PPPP was measured as participants' overall satisfaction with the content of PPPP, extent to which the participant felt engaged, and belief that the program helped them learn about pneumonia and the vaccination.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Satisfaction With PPPP
ParticipantsPPPP Participants
Satisfied with content — Completely Agree69
Satisfied with content — Somewhat agree3
Satisfied with content — Somewhat disagree1
Satisfied with content — Completely disagree1
Satisfied with content — No response116
Engaged or interested in the program — Completely Agree70
Engaged or interested in the program — Somewhat agree4
Engaged or interested in the program — Somewhat disagree0
Engaged or interested in the program — Completely disagree0
Engaged or interested in the program — No response116
Program helped learn about pneumonia & vaccination — Completely Agree110
Program helped learn about pneumonia & vaccination — Somewhat agree26
Program helped learn about pneumonia & vaccination — Somewhat disagree3
Program helped learn about pneumonia & vaccination — Completely disagree0
Program helped learn about pneumonia & vaccination — No response51
SecondaryIntervention Cost

Measures PPPP intervention costs per participant. Consists of total program costs divided by number of participants. Value reported is the per-participant cost with measure type "number".

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Number · $/participant
Intervention Cost
$/participantPPPP Participants
Intervention Cost162.43
SecondaryPharmacist Satisfaction

Pharmacists who participated in the intervention were surveyed to determine their satisfaction with the program, including: 1) satisfaction with live action skit, 2) belief that PPPP was successful in educating participants, 3) belief that PPPP was successful in building trust in pharmacists among participants, 4) belief that PPPP was successful in increasing acceptance of pharmacists as immunizers, and 5) belief that PPPP will decrease barriers to vaccination among participants.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Pharmacist Satisfaction
ParticipantsPharmacy Staff
Satisfaction with live action skit — Agree18
Satisfaction with live action skit — Disagree1
Satisfaction with live action skit — No response1
Belief that PPPP successfully educated participnts — Agree19
Belief that PPPP successfully educated participnts — Disagree1
Belief that PPPP successfully educated participnts — No response0
Belief that PPPP successfully built trust — Agree17
Belief that PPPP successfully built trust — Disagree2
Belief that PPPP successfully built trust — No response1
Belief that PPPP successfully increased acceptance — Agree19
Belief that PPPP successfully increased acceptance — Disagree1
Belief that PPPP successfully increased acceptance — No response0
Belief that PPPP decreased barriers to vaccination — Agree20
Belief that PPPP decreased barriers to vaccination — Disagree0
Belief that PPPP decreased barriers to vaccination — No response0

Adverse events

Collected over Time of vaccination plus 7 days following receipt of vaccine. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PPPP Participants - Vaccine Recipients—0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PPPP Participants
Mean74.4 ± 8.955
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)PPPP Participants
Gender, customized — Female152
Gender, customized — Male23
Gender, customized — No response / prefer not to answer28
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PPPP Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American163
White2
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported38
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PPPP Participants
United States203
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Center in the Park
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19144, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 3, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01944462
Lead sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 17, 2013
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2014
Completion
Nov 2014
Results posted
Jan 3, 2018
Last update
Jan 3, 2018

Study contacts

Laura Pizzi, PharmD, MPH
principal investigator · Thomas Jefferson University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion