A Phase 4 interventional study of Routine meropenem therapy and Meropenem therapy based on a PPK and PD model in Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, sponsored by Qingtao Zhou. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 95 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-25.
Sponsored by Qingtao Zhou · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
To evaluate the clinical and economical benefits of a meropenem dosage strategy based on a population pharmacokinetic(PPK)-pharmacodynamic(PD) model in lower respiratory tract infection patients.
6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 79 is below the median of 120 across 4,201 interventional studies indexed under Infections.
Browse Infections studies →This is the only study on the registry with Qingtao Zhou as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The participants in control group will accept routine meropenem therapy
Drug: Routine meropenem therapy
The participants in study group will accept meropenem therapy based on a PPK and PD model.
Drug: Meropenem therapy based on a PPK and PD model
Participants in control group will accept meropenem therapy with regimen routinely decided by attending physician
Also known as: Standard care
Participants in study group will accept meropenem therapy based on a software developed from a PPK and PD model
Also known as: Experimental meropenem therapy
Clinical Success Rate
The clinical success or failure of meropenem therapy will be evaluated one week after stop of antibiotic therapy. Clinical success was defined as cure or improvement of all signs and symptoms caused by the infection and no requirement for additional antibacterial therapy. Clinical failure was defined as a persistence or worsening of any new clinical sign or symptom, development of any new clinical signs or symptoms of infection, or the requirement for other systemic antimicrobial therapy at the end of meropenem therapy.
Time frame: One week after antibiotic therapy finished.
Amount of Used Antibiotics
Record the amount of antibiotics usage during antibiotic therapy
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of antibiotic therapy, an average of 10 days
Bacteriological Success Rate
The bacterial success or failure will be evaluated at the end of meropenem therapy. Bacteriological success including eradication and presumed eradication. Bacteriological failure including persistence and presumed persistence.
Time frame: At the end of meropenem therapy, an average of 10 days.
| Milestone | Control Group | Study Group |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 40 | 39 |
| Completed | 40 | 39 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
The clinical success or failure of meropenem therapy will be evaluated one week after stop of antibiotic therapy. Clinical success was defined as cure or improvement of all signs and symptoms caused by the infection and no requirement for additional antibacterial therapy. Clinical failure was defined as a persistence or worsening of any new clinical sign or symptom, development of any new clinical signs or symptoms of infection, or the requirement for other systemic antimicrobial therapy at the end of meropenem therapy.
| participants | Control Group | Study Group |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Success Rate | 28 | 35 |
Record the amount of antibiotics usage during antibiotic therapy
| grams | Control Group | Study Group |
|---|---|---|
| Amount of Used Antibiotics | 19.0 (12.0 to 29.5) | 15.0 (7.5 to 24.0) |
The bacterial success or failure will be evaluated at the end of meropenem therapy. Bacteriological success including eradication and presumed eradication. Bacteriological failure including persistence and presumed persistence.
| participants | Control Group | Study Group |
|---|---|---|
| Bacteriological Success Rate | 24 | 28 |
Collected over 1 month. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | — | 4/40 (10%) | 0/40 (0%) |
| Study Group | — | 0/39 (0%) | 0/39 (0%) |
| Event | Control Group | Study Group |
|---|---|---|
| DeathVascular disorders | 4/40 | 0/39 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Control Group | Study Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 79 (74 to 87) | 78 (76 to 84) | 79 (76 to 85) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Control Group | Study Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 16 | 10 | 26 |
| Male | 24 | 29 | 53 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Control Group | Study Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 40 | 39 | 79 |
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.