ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01940198REfLecTUpdated Sep 12, 2013

Long-term Atazanavir Experience in a High HIV Caseload Primary Care Practice in Sydney, Australia

An observational study in HIV, sponsored by Holdsworth House Medical Practice. Completed at 1 site in Australia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-09-12.

Sponsored by Holdsworth House Medical Practice · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
117
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study will aim to determine long-term atazanavir experience in a high HIV caseload primary care practice in Sydney, Australia.

Read the detailed description

This observational study will aim to determine long term atazanavir experience in HIV-1 infected patients in a primary care setting.

3. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY i. Primary objective Long-term (2 years or greater) atazanavir experience in HIV-1 infected patients in a primary care setting through retrospective data collection.

ii. Secondary objectives

  1. To illustrate long term therapeutic efficacy of atazanavir in ART naïve and experienced HIV-1 infected patients.
  2. To illustrate long term tolerability to atazanavir in ART naïve and experienced HIV-1 infected patients.
  3. To identify ART treatment history in ART naïve and experienced HIV-1 infected patients on ATV.
  4. To identify contraindicated therapy in ART naïve and experienced HIV-1 infected patients on ATV.
02

Conditions studied

  • HIV

Keywords

  • Atazanavir
  • long-term
  • primary care setting
  • sydney
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Holdsworth House Medical Practice is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Cohort of HIV-1 positive patients attending Holdsworth House Medical Practice who have commenced ATV as a component of ART will be identified from review of current database.

Data will be collected retrospectively from patient electronic medical records for HIV-1 positive patients that have commenced ATV from year 2002 - 2008.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. HIV-1 positive
  2. Have commenced ATV between 2002-2008 (Baseline)
  3. Follow-up data (clinical and laboratory) available from baseline

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients not commenced ATV between 2002-2008
  2. No follow-up data (clinical and laboratory) available from baseline
  3. Patient 'lost to follow-up' with \< 2 years of follow-up data (Clinical and laboratory)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
117 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of HIV-1 infected participants with atazanavir experience

    Proportion of patients who continue on atazanavir for 2 years or greater from baseline to termination/current.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of HIV-1 infected participants with atazanavir experience

    1\. Therapeutic efficacy of atazanavir

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Proportion of HIV-1 infected participants with atazanavir experience

    Tolerability to atazanavir

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Proportion of HIV-1 infected participants with atazanavir experience

    ART treatment history

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Proportion of HIV-1 infected participants with atazanavir experience

    contraindicated therapy

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Holdsworth House Medical Practice
    Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2010, a primary completion of Aug 2011 and a completion of Sep 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 1, 2010
First posted
Sep 12, 2013
Start
Apr 2010
Primary completionActual
Aug 2011
CompletionActual
Sep 2012
Last update
Sep 12, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 12, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01940198
Lead sponsor
Holdsworth House Medical Practice
Responsible party
Dr. Mark Bloch (Principal Investigator, Holdsworth House Medical Practice) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 12, 2013
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
Aug 2011
Completion
Sep 2012
Last update
Sep 12, 2013

Study contacts

Mark Bloch, Dr.
principal investigator · Holdsworth House Medical Practice

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion