CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01921244Updated Feb 5, 2016

Shared Decision Making to Improve Care and Outcomes for Children With Autism

An interventional study of Decision Aid in Autistic Disorder, Pervasive Developmental Disorder and Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 15 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-05.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
142
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) commonly experience behavioral challenges that may be improved with pharmacotherapy, including difficulties with sleep, attention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive behavior, mood swings, self-injury, and aggression. While 34-58% of children with ASD take medication for such behaviors, there is wide practice variation nationally and a lack of evidence to support the use of most commonly prescribed agents. Complex clinical situations such as this where there is no clear "best choice" regarding which behaviors to target and which medications to use lend themselves well to the use of a Shared Decision Making (SDM) tool to ensure that well-informed parent preferences shape every treatment plan.

The primary goal of this study is to modify a previously published decision aid about use of medication to manage challenging behaviors in children with autism to make it easy to implement in practice and then evaluate this version in terms of proximal decisional outcomes and parent/child outcomes 3 months later. Providers in a Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric clinic will be enrolled and randomly allocated to intervention or control (treatment as usual) groups. Initially, providers randomized to the intervention group will test and refine the modified intervention. Once the intervention is finalized, eligible patients of participating providers will be enrolled in the randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of the intervention. Following the trial, control group providers will be crossed over and receive the intervention. Both proximal decisional outcomes (e.g. parent decisional conflict, provider amount of SDM, parent knowledge of treatment options) and outcomes 3 months later (e.g. parenting stress, decisional conflict, and change in child behavioral symptoms) will be assessed.

Approximately 10 providers and 240 of their patients with autism will be included in the study. Chart reviews, parental surveys, and recordings of provider-parent-patient interactions during the index visit will be collected at baseline (prior to physician allocation), during the intervention trial, and after the control group has crossed over. Between- and within-group analyses will examine factors associated with parental decisional conflict and whether the intervention produces significant improvements in outcomes over and above typical autism care. Analyses will include multiple linear regression modeling and general linear models / repeated measure models, accounting for data clustered by provider.

Read the detailed description

SDM involves clinicians sharing information about treatment options and parents sharing their goals, concerns, and preferences to ensure that treatment plans are based on what matters most to well-informed parents. SDM often incorporates use of decision aids, which are balanced sources of information about treatment options for a particular condition. Decision aids consistently increase knowledge, improve treatment expectations, increase active participation in decision making, reduce uncertainty about the appropriate course of action, and help patients reach decisions that are more aligned with their stated values.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autistic Disorder
  • Pervasive Developmental Disorder
  • Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
  • Asperger Syndrome
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Autism

Keywords

  • Autistic Disorder
  • Decision Making
  • Medication Therapy Management
03

In context

Autistic Disorder

1,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 334 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 142 is above the median of 45 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 661 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 54 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Providers

  • Providers must be a licensed professional, either a physician (MD) or a nurse practitioner (APN) in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's Hospital.
  • Provider must regularly treat patients within the age range and for the diagnoses of interest in this study (Autism Spectrum Disorders).

Parents

  • Participants must be a parent or legal guardian who self-identifies as the primary caregiver of a child or adolescent with Autism Spectrum Disorder cared for by an enrolled provider in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's Hospital.
  • Participants must be able to speak and read English in order to complete the surveys

Children

  • Child or adolescent must have a clinical diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder including one of the following diagnoses: a) Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD), b) Asperger's Syndrome, c) Autism Spectrum Disorder, d) Autism, e) Infantile Autism
  • Child or adolescent must be between the ages of 4 years 0 months and 15 years 11 months
  • Child or adolescent must be scheduled for a follow up visit with a Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric provider enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-Parents who are unable to speak and read English are not eligible for the study.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
142 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    Approximately 120 families will be asked to participate as "usual care" subjects and will complete surveys before and immediately after their visit, and approximately 3 months after the visit. These families will not receive the decision aid nor will their provider have been trained how to use the decision aid. All participating providers will have up to 10 "usual care" patients enrolled at baseline prior to allocation. During the trial, the control group \["usual care" providers\] will have up to 10 additional patients enrolled for ongoing "usual care" data collection. After the trial is complete, the control group providers will cross over to the intervention arm.

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Approximately 80 families/patients with regularly scheduled clinic follow-up visits in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (DDBP) at Cincinnati Childrens with providers trained on shared decision making will receive the decision aid prior to their index visit and complete surveys before and immediately after their visit, and approximately 3 months later.

    Other: Decision Aid

Interventions

  • OtherDecision Aid

    Parents will receive an intervention modified from the previously published tool called "Autism: Should My Child Take Medicine for Challenging Behavior?" This packet provides parents with educational information, elicits parent ratings of particular behavioral domains, describes behaviors that are and are not amenable to medication treatment, and elicits parent preferences regarding treatment. Providers will be trained on use of the intervention in practice to promote shared decision making during clinical encounters.

    Also known as: Use of Medication to Treat Challenging Behavior in Autism

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Decisional Conflict

    The primary outcome of interest for this study is decisional conflict as measured immediately at the end of the Day 1 initial study clinic visit. This measure will also be collected before the Day 1 visit to be able to compare pre- and post- visit levels of decisional conflict. Additionally, this measure will be collected 3 months after the Day 1 visit to determine levels of ongoing decisional conflict that parents of children with autism experience. This will be measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale. This is a validated 16-item questionnaire which reports on the uncertainty experienced when feeling uninformed about the alternatives, benefits and risks, unclear about personal values, or unsupported in making a choice.

    Time frame: At the end of the Day 1 (initial study) visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parent-physician interaction

    The OPTION scale (validated 12-item measure) will be used to score parent-physician interactions developing a treatment plan based on coding of audio or video recordings of the clinic visit.

    Time frame: During the Day 1 (initial study) visit

Other outcomes

  1. Parental Knowledge of Medications for Challenging Behaviors in ASD

    Assess parents' knowledge of medications for challenging ASD behaviors with an 18-item checklist developed for this study. This includes questions on general knowledge about the role of medication in ASD treatment and assesses caregiver expectations of whether medication might improve specific challenging behaviors.

    Time frame: At the end of the Day 1 (initial study) visit

  2. Parenting Stress

    Will be measured using the Parenting Stress Index- Short Form. This is a validated 36-item questionnaire pertaining to the demands of taking care of a child. It includes 3 subscales and a total score: parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child.

    Time frame: Before or at the time of the Day 1 (initial study) visit and at the 3 month interval follow up

  3. Shared Decision Making

    Parental perception of shared decision making during the clinical encounter will be assessed using the CollaboRATE. This is a brief, 3-question survey that assesses parent-reported shared decision making.

    Time frame: At the end of the Day 1 (initial study) visit

  4. Child Behavioral Symptoms

    Child behavioral symptoms will be measured at the time of the Day 1 (initial study) visit and 3 months later using: 1. The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) will be used to assess behavioral functioning by domains of treatment. The CBCL is a commonly used clinical and research measure. The 120 scale items map onto Diagnostic and Statistical Manual(DSM)-oriented scales and will be used as a standardized measure of behavioral symptoms. 2. Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC): 58-item caregiver report form developed to assess maladaptive behaviors in individuals with developmental disabilities and commonly used to assess behavior in studies of children with ASD.

    Time frame: Before or at the time of the Day 1 (initial study) visit and 3 month interval follow up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cincinnati Children's Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Frazier TW, Shattuck PT, Narendorf SC, Cooper BP, Wagner M, Spitznagel EL. Prevalence and correlates of psychotropic medication use in adolescents with an autism spectrum disorder with and without caregiver-reported attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011 Dec;21(6):571-9. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0057. Epub 2011 Dec 13. PubMed 22166171 ↗
  • Nickels K, Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Weaver AL, Voigt RG, Barbaresi WJ. Stimulant medication treatment of target behaviors in children with autism: a population-based study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008 Apr;29(2):75-81. doi: 10.1097/dbp.0b013e31815f24f7. PubMed 18478626 ↗
  • Blum NJ, Feldman HM, Barbaresi WJ, Schonfeld DJ, Hansen RL, Forrest CB. Research priorities for developmental-behavioral pediatrics: a DBPNet consensus study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Jul;33(6):509-16. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31825a7101. PubMed 22710856 ↗
  • O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR63-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.63. PubMed 15471770 ↗
  • Fiks AG, Mayne S, Localio AR, Feudtner C, Alessandrini EA, Guevara JP. Shared decision making and behavioral impairment: a national study among children with special health care needs. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Sep 21;12:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-153. PubMed 22998626 ↗
  • Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Legare F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. PubMed 21975733 ↗
  • Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14. PubMed 16908462 ↗
  • Fowler FJ Jr, Levin CA, Sepucha KR. Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decisions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):699-706. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0003. PubMed 21471491 ↗
  • Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 12. PubMed 23768763 ↗
  • Brinkman WB, Hartl J, Rawe LM, Sucharew H, Britto MT, Epstein JN. Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Nov;165(11):1013-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.154. PubMed 22065181 ↗
  • O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105. PubMed 7898294 ↗
  • Brinkley J, Nations L, Abramson RK, Hall A, Wright HH, Gabriels R, Gilbert JR, Pericak-Vance MA, Cuccaro ML. Factor analysis of the aberrant behavior checklist in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Nov;37(10):1949-59. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0327-3. Epub 2006 Dec 21. PubMed 17186368 ↗
  • Zaidman-Zait A, Mirenda P, Zumbo BD, Georgiades S, Szatmari P, Bryson S, Fombonne E, Roberts W, Smith I, Vaillancourt T, Volden J, Waddell C, Zwaigenbaum L, Duku E, Thompson A; Pathways in ASD Study Team. Factor analysis of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form with parents of young children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res. 2011 Oct;4(5):336-46. doi: 10.1002/aur.213. Epub 2011 Aug 31. PubMed 21882359 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01921244
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2013
Start date
Aug 2013
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Last update
Feb 5, 2016

Study contacts

Julia Anixt, MD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion