CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT01911013Updated Dec 1, 2023

A Study of Korean Society of Spine Surgery on the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

An interventional study of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and Cage and Plate in Radiculopathy, Cervical and Myelopathy, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 31 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-01.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is firstly to determine the efficacy of cervical plate for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical cage, and secondly to investigate the determining factors for surgical outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Radiculopathy, Cervical
  • Myelopathy

Keywords

  • degenerative cervical disease
  • anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
  • plate and cage
  • cage alone
03

In context

Radiculopathy

488 studies on the registry are indexed under Radiculopathy; 141 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 60 across 376 interventional studies indexed under Radiculopathy.

Browse Radiculopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,860 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • degenerative cervical disease
  • radiculopathy or myelopathy refractory to conservative treatment
  • be scheduled to undergo one segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
  • age is more than 19 years old
  • all requirements of preoperative image studies are satisfied

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous neck surgery or radiation treatments at neck area
  • fusion at adjacent segments
  • two segment fusion is expected
  • C2-3 or C7-T1
  • high risk for additional cervical surgery within one year
  • ossification of posterior longitudinal ligaments, trauma, infection, tumor, congenital or developmental disease
  • inadequate radiological images
  • patient is not expected to be observed at long term follow-up (foreigner, international student)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cage and Plate

    anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery at one segment is performed using cervical cage and plate system

    Procedure: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion · Device: Cage and Plate

  • Experimental
    Cage alone

    anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery at one segment is performed using only cervical cage without plate

    Procedure: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion · Device: Cage alone

Interventions

  • Procedureanterior cervical discectomy and fusion

    anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plating or not

  • DeviceCage and Plate

    anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is performed using cervical cage and plate

  • DeviceCage alone

    anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is performed using cage alone with plate.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cervical fusion status

    Cervical fusion rates (%) is compared using CT and flexion/extension X-ray between two groups. For statistical analysis, Chi-Square test is used.

    Time frame: five year after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. predisposing factor of non-union

    Using logistic regression analysis, odds ratio of each variable is calculated for non-union after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  2. risk factors of dysphagia

    a specific questionnaire is used for assessment for dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. For comparison of dysphagia rates(%) between two group, Chi-square analysis is used. Furthermore, odds ratio of each variable for dysphagia is calculated for logistic regression analysis.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  3. risk factors of dysphonia

    a specific questionnaire is used for assessment for dysphonia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. For comparison of dysphonia rates(%) between two group, Chi-square analysis is used. Furthermore, odds ratio of each variable for dysphonia is calculated for logistic regression analysis.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  4. factors for quality of life

    Firstly, total cost is calculated for each case. European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions is also used for assessment of quality of life after operation. Between two groups, quality of life per cost is evaluated.

    Time frame: one years after operation

  5. risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration

    The rates (%) of radiological and clinical adjacent segment degeneration is evaluated using X-ray and clinical evaluation in both groups. For statistical analysis, Chi-Square test is used for comparison of rates (%) for adjacent segment degeneration. Furthermore, logistic regression test is also used for calculating odds ratio for adjacent segment degeneration

    Time frame: five year after surgery

  6. correlation between osteoporosis and fusion

    The rates (%) of fusion is evaluated in relation to osteoporosis. For statistical analysis, Chi-Square test is used for comparison between osteoporosis group and non-osteoporosis group.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  7. relation between brace wearing and fusion

    The rates (%) of fusion is evaluated using X-ray and CT scan according to kinds of brace in both groups. For statistical analysis, Chi-Square test is used for comparison of fusion rates (%).

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  8. surgical outcomes for combined uncinectomy

    In relation with uncinectomy, the clinical outcomes (VAS, NDI) and radiological outcome (fusion rates(%)) is compared using t-test and Chi-square test.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  9. change of neck motion after surgery

    Serial changes of whole cervical neck motion (degree) is evaluated and compared between pre- and post-operative states. statistical significance is evaluated using one-way ANOVA or paired t test.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  10. neuropathy after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery

    The occurrence rates(%) of neuropathic pain is evaluated using a specific questionnaires. Several factors to be associated with neuropathic pain is evaluated using logistic regression analysis.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  11. relation between the method of bone graft and fusion

    The rates (%) of fusion is evaluated using X-ray and CT scan according to methods of bone graft in both groups. For statistical analysis, Chi-Square test is used for comparison of fusion rates(%) in relation to the bone graft method.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  12. analysis of complication rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery

    After anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, complication rates (%) was evaluated, and this is compared between two groups. Further, factors to be associated with complication rates is assessed using Chi-square test

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  13. The correlation between existence of co-morbidity and surgical outcome

    The clinical and radiological outcomes is evaluated using VAS, NDI, and X-ray in relation with existence of coexistence. T-test and Chi-square test are used for statistical analysis for comparison between co-morbidity group and non-co-morbidity group.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  14. The correlation analysis between smoking history and surgical outcome (fusion rates, improvement of pain and disability)

    The surgical outcomes such as fusion rates(%), VAS, and NDI score were evaluated in relation with smoking history. For analysis, Chi-square and t-test are used for comparison between smoking group and non-smoking group.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

07

Study locations

31 sites
  • National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital
    Ilsan, Gyounggi-do 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital
    Dongan, Gyounggido 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Hallym University Hospital
    Dongan, Gyounggido 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital
    Ilsan, Gyounggido 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Bundang Jesaeng Hospital
    Seongnam, Gyounggido 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital
    Ilsan, Gyounggi 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA university
    Seongnam, Gyoungido 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
    Yangsan, Gyoungnam 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Wonkwang University School of Medicine & Hospital
    Iksan, Jeonbuk 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, Jongno-gu 110-744, Korea, Republic of
  • Pohang Semyung Christianity Hospital
    Pohang, Kyoungpook 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
    Busan, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital
    Busan, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Pusan National University Hospital
    Busan, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Kyungpook National University Hospital
    Daegu, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Eulji University Hospital
    Daejeon, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • The Catholic University of Korea Daejeon ST. Mary's hospital
    Daejeon, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Chonnam National University Hospital
    Gwangju, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Chosun University Hospital
    Gwangju, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Kwangju Christian Hospital
    Gwangju, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Inha University Hospital
    Incheon, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon St. Mary's hospital
    Incheon, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
    Seoul, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Chung-Ang University Hospital
    Seoul, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Gangnam severance hospital
    Seoul, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Korea University Anam Hospital
    Seoul, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • National Police Hospital
    Seoul, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center
    Seoul, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital
    Seoul, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
  • VHS Medical Center
    Seoul, 602-702, Korea, Republic of
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01911013
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Collaborators
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
Responsible party
Jin S. Yeom (Associate Professor, Seoul National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 30, 2013
Start date
Sep 1, 2013
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2017
Completion
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 1, 2023

Study contacts

Jin S. Yeom, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion