CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01905293Updated Jul 23, 2013

Individual Differences in Children's Susceptibility to Overeating

An interventional study of Feeding Study in Obesity, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 10 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-23.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The portion size of foods has been identified as an important determinant of energy intake in children. It remains to be determined to what extent child weight status and the relative reinforcing value of food may interact with the obesogenic food environment to affect energy intake. The primary aim of this study was to compare energy intake at a meal in normal-weight and obese children when the portion size of palatable, energy-dense foods and a sugar-sweetened beverage was systematically increased. We hypothesized that increasing the portion size of all foods and the beverage at a meal will lead to a significant increase in energy intake in both normal-weight and obese children. Obese children, however, will show a significantly greater increase in energy intake than will normal-weight children. A second aim of this study was to test if children's response to increases in portion size was affected by how reinforcing they find food to be. We hypothesized that, when controlling for BMI, children who find food very reinforcing relative to nonfood alternatives will show a significantly greater increase in energy intake than will children who find food less reinforcing.

Read the detailed description

The prevalence of childhood and adolescent obesity has reached an all-time high. There is a pressing need to better understand the behavioral mechanisms that control appetite and eating in children and to identify children who are most susceptible to overeating in the current obesogenic food environment. Obesogenic environments offer convenient access to large portions of palatable, energy-dense foods. The portion size of foods has been identified as an important determinant of energy intake in adults and children. While portion size effects have been found in heterogenous groups of healthy individuals, some evidence points to possible individual differences in the magnitude of children's responsiveness to large food portions. For example, data from a previous laboratory study suggest that overweight and obese children may be particularly vulnerable to overeating when presented with large food portions. Further, the magnitude of a portion size effect on intake may also depend on how reinforcing (or rewarding) children find food to be. It is possible that the relative reinforcing value of food may interact with environmental cues, such as the portion size of food, to affect children's energy intake when large portions of palatable, energy-dense foods are available. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of increasing the portion size of all foods and a beverage served at a meal on energy intake in normal-weight and obese children. A second aim is to test if children who find food very reinforcing relative to an appealing nonfood alternative will show a significantly greater increase in energy intake in response to increasing portion sizes than will children who find food less reinforcing. The findings from this study are expected to extend previous findings to test how environmental factors, such as food portion size, may interact with individual differences in weight status or food reinforcement to affect energy intake in children.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hyperphagia

94 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperphagia; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 50 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Hyperphagia.

Browse Hyperphagia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 8 to 10 years of age
  • normal-weight or obese
  • like most foods that were served in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • serious medical conditions or medication use known to affect appetite, food intake, and body weight
  • developmental or psychiatric conditions
  • learning disability
  • sight or hearing impairment
  • food allergies or nutrient intolerances (including lactose intolerance)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    100% portion size

    100% portion size condition

    Other: Feeding Study

  • Experimental
    150% portion size

    150% portion size condition

    Other: Feeding Study

  • Experimental
    200% portion size

    200% portion size condition

    Other: Feeding Study

Interventions

  • OtherFeeding Study
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total energy intake

    Time frame: Up to 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Energy intake from food

    Time frame: Up to 3 weeks

  2. Energy intake from beverage

    Time frame: Up to 3 weeks

  3. Percent estimated energy requirement (%EER)

    Time frame: Up to 3 weeks

  4. Relative reinforcing value of food (RRVF)

    Time frame: Up to 3 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01905293
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2013
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Mar 2012
Last update
Jul 23, 2013

Study contacts

Tanja VE Kral, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion