A Phase 2 interventional study of Nuvaring and EFV in HIV-1 Infection, sponsored by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections. Completed at 21 sites in 8 countries. Open to female participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-06.
Sponsored by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This study was done to look at a method of hormonal birth control, called the NuvaRing, and specific anti-HIV medications, called antiretrovirals (ARVs). Some studies of women who use a hormonal birth control method (specifically oral pills, patches, and injections) and take ARVs have shown that ARVs interact with the hormones released by the birth control medication. These interactions may cause the birth control to be less effective at preventing pregnancy. There is also concern that hormonal birth control can increase HIV spreading to others, but more studies are needed to determine if this is true. The investigators did not know whether the NuvaRing and ARVs interact when they are used together, so this study looked to see if certain ARVs (efavirenz and atazanavir/ritonavir) interact with the two hormones released by NuvaRing. This will help us to determine if NuvaRing is safe and effective for women with HIV infection who are taking ARVs. The study also included HIV-infected women who were not on ARVs but used the NuvaRing to show us what the hormone levels are like in a similar group of women not on ARVs.
Vaginal rings are also currently being studied to deliver anti-HIV medications that may prevent HIV acquisition, and to provide birth control over a longer period of time (more than 1 month). Since vaginal rings will become more commonly used to administer medications, the investigators wanted to better understand the potential for drug interactions with drugs given vaginally. This study will also help us understand the potential for drug interactions between ARVs given orally, and other drugs given through vaginal rings, like the NuvaRing. Additionally, this study will help us understand how hormones released from a vaginal ring affect the amount of HIV virus in the genital tract, the bacterial make-up (microbiome) of the female genital tract, and the immune system within the genital tract, all of which may affect the chances of spreading HIV.
This was a 28 day study from study entry through the final clinic visit. Post-entry visits were scheduled at Days 7, 14, 21 and 28. The Nuvaring was put in place at study entry and removed on day 21. A single pharmacokinetic (PK) blood sample was collected for assay of etonogestrel (ENG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) at entry (day 0, prior to NuvaRing placement), and on days 7, 14, and 21 after placement of the NuvaRing. For participants on the ARV arms, intensive, 8-hour PK sampling, for assay of efavirenz (EFV) and atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) respectively, was performed at study entry (day 0, prior to NuvaRing placement) and 21 days later. ARV sampling was performed at pre-dose (hour 0), and 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose. Safety was assessed at each study visit.
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections is the lead sponsor of 70 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (86%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
NOTE: Participants must have had access to their ART regimens through their primary care providers. ART medications were not supplied by this study.
Laboratory values within 60 days prior to study entry:
All participants must have agreed not to participate in a conception process (eg, active attempt to become pregnant or in vitro fertilization) for the duration of the study. Because it was unknown if ARVs adversely affect the efficacy of NuvaRing as a contraceptive method, participants of reproductive potential, who were participating in sexual activities that could lead to pregnancy, must have agreed to use an additional reliable form of contraception while in the study. Acceptable additional methods of contraception included:
Other hormonal forms of contraception were not allowed during the study period.
Condoms should have been used to prevent transmission of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases between sexual partners.
NOTE: Participants with bilateral tubal ligation or non-hormonal IUD were eligible to be enrolled.
Exclusion Criteria:
Once NuvaRing is inserted into the vagina, the ring should remain in place (not be removed) continuously for 3 weeks (21 days).
Device: Nuvaring
Once NuvaRing is inserted into the vagina, the ring should remain in place (not be removed) continuously for 3 weeks (21 days). EFV is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor taken at a dose of 600 mg once daily.
Device: Nuvaring · Drug: EFV · Drug: NRTIs
Once NuvaRing is inserted into the vagina, the ring should remain in place (not be removed) continuously for 3 weeks (21 days). ATV/r is a combination protease inhibitor taken at a dose of 300/100 mg once daily. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) taken at a dose of 300 mg daily.
Device: Nuvaring · Drug: ATV/r · Drug: TDF · Drug: NRTIs
NuvaRing is made of ethylene vinylacetate copolymers (28% and 9% vinylacetate) and magnesium stearate, is latex free, and contains 11.7 mg etonogestrel and 2.7 mg ethinyl estradiol. NuvaRing has an outer diameter of 54 mm and a cross-sectional diameter of 4mm. Once NuvaRing is inserted into the vagina, the ring should remain in place (not be removed) continuously for 3 weeks (21 days). After being in place for the first 21 days of the study, the ring may be removed after the day 21 study visit evaluations have been completed.
Also known as: Etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring
Participants received EFV 600 mg daily with two or more NRTIs
Also known as: Efavirenz
Participants received ATV/r 300 mg/ 100 mg daily with tenofovir and one or more additional NRTIs
Also known as: Atazanavir/Ritonavir
Participants received 300 mg of tenofovir in Arm C
Also known as: Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Participants received two or more NRTIs in Arm B and one or more NRTIs in Arm C
Also known as: Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor
Etonogestrel Concentrations at Study Day 21
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The pharmacokinetic (PK) blood sample for measurement of etonogestrel on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).
Time frame: Day 21
Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations at Study Day 21
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The PK blood sample for measurement of ethinyl estradiol on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL ; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).
Time frame: Day 21
Etonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).
Time frame: Study days 7 and 14
Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).
Time frame: Study days 7 and 14
EFV PK Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-24hours) Calculated Based on Intensive EFV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of EFV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
EFV PK Parameter Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
EFV PK Parameter Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
EFV PK Parameter Clearance (CLss/F) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance
Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
ATV PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive Atazanavir (ATV) PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of ATV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
ATV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
ATV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
ATV PK Parameter Time to Cmax (Tmax) Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Tmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
ATV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/f defines apparent oral clearance.
Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).
Ritonavir (RTV) PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive RTV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
RTV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmin of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
RTV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
RTV PK Parameter Tmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Tmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
RTV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter CLss/F of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance.
Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mL
This evaluates the short-term impact of Nuvaring on virologic suppression in participants who have been administered Nuvaring alone or together with EFV or ATV/r by measuring proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels \<40 copies/mL at study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and study day 21 (three weeks after vaginal ring placement). An FDA-approved HIV-1 RNA assay was required.
Time frame: Study day 0 and study day 21
Percentage of Participants With Signs and Symptoms of Grade 2 or Higher Deemed Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment
This evaluates toxicity and safety of NuvaRing alone, NuvaRing with EFV, and NuvaRing with ATV/r. Signs/symptoms were graded using the DAIDS AE Grading Table was used. Participants with sign(s)/symptom(s) of grade 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (potentially life-threatening) or 5 (death) are included in the percentage. Relationship to study treatment was determined by the study co-chairs and DAIDS clinical representative.
Time frame: From day 0 to day 28
Proportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.
This evaluates alterations in progesterone levels due to the potential PK interaction between NuvaRing and the ARVs EFV and ATV/r by examining progesterone levels at study days 0 (before vaginal ring placement), 7, 14, and 21 (before vaginal ring removal), and study day 28, without regard to menstrual cycle status at study entry.
Time frame: Study days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28
The first participant enrolled in December 2014 and final participant enrolled in September 2016. Enrollment took place at 21 US and non-US clinical research sites.
| Milestone | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| Completed | 25 | 25 | 24 |
| Not completed | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Withdrew: Not able to attend clinic | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Missed day 21 primary endpoint visit | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Protocol violation | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Nuvaring removed prior to day 21 visit | 0 | 0 | 1 |
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The pharmacokinetic (PK) blood sample for measurement of etonogestrel on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).
| pg/mL | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etonogestrel Concentrations at Study Day 21 | 1860.00 (665.00 to 3590.00) | 429.00 (125.00 to 1180.00) | 3290.00 (730.00 to 6920.00) |
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The PK blood sample for measurement of ethinyl estradiol on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL ; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).
| pg/mL | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations at Study Day 21 | 21.30 (6.46 to 51.00) | 11.40 (2.50 to 21.00) | 16.05 (2.50 to 26.40) |
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).
| pg/mL | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration at Day 7 | 1970.00 (703.00 to 3220.00) | 427.00 (125.00 to 916.00) | 3250.00 (1330.00 to 4960.00) |
| Concentration at Day 14 | 2070.00 (648.00 to 3720.00) | 437.00 (125.00 to 1090.00) | 3530.00 (725.00 to 6100.00) |
This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).
| pg/mL | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration at Day 7 | 18.05 (6.71 to 50.90) | 9.98 (2.50 to 18.70) | 15.70 (5.48 to 24.30) |
| Concentration at Day 14 | 19.70 (6.51 to 47.90) | 10.50 (2.50 to 18.60) | 16.55 (6.76 to 26.90) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of EFV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
| h*ng/mL | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| AUC0-24h day 0 | 68949.1 (27114.3 to 367995.4) |
| AUC0-24h day 21 | 57795.9 (26326.3 to 362821.3) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
| ng/mL | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| Cmin day 0 | 2121.5 (903.7 to 13620.0) |
| Cmin day 21 | 1766.0 (10.0 to 12930.0) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
| ng/mL | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| Cmax day 0 | 4541.0 (1347.0 to 18670.0) |
| Cmax day 21 | 3786.0 (2231.0 to 19110.0) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance
| L/h | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| CLss/F day 0 | 8.7 (1.6 to 22.1) |
| CLss/F day 21 | 10.4 (1.7 to 22.8) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of ATV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
| h*ng/mL | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| AUC0-24h day 0 | 44313.7 (8802.3 to 91766.5) |
| AUC0-24h day 21 | 36764.7 (1346.9 to 108450.6) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
| ng/mL | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| Cmin day 0 | 796.7 (10.0 to 2731.0) |
| Cmin day 21 | 599.4 (10.0 to 3599.0) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
| ng/mL | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| Cmax day 0 | 4291.0 (769.7 to 9440.0) |
| Cmax day 21 | 3583.0 (83.6 to 6578.0) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Tmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.
| hour | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| Tmax day 0 | 2.9 (0.9 to 4.0) |
| Tmax day 21 | 3.0 (0.0 to 5.0) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/f defines apparent oral clearance.
| L/h | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| CLss/F day 0 | 6.8 (3.3 to 34.1) |
| CLss/F day 21 | 8.2 (2.8 to 222.7) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
| h*ng/mL | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| AUC0-24h day 0 | 10740.0 (3922.3 to 32632.7) |
| AUC0-24h day 21 | 7210.7 (240.0 to 31728.7) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmin of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
| ng/mL | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| Cmin day 0 | 70.0 (10.0 to 1042.0) |
| Cmin day 21 | 51.9 (10.0 to 916.9) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
| ng/mL | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| Cmax day 0 | 1437.0 (426.3 to 3078.0) |
| Cmax day 21 | 1063.0 (10.0 to 2297.0) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Tmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.
| hour | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| Tmax day 0 | 3.0 (0.9 to 5.0) |
| Tmax day 21 | 3.0 (0.0 to 5.0) |
This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter CLss/F of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance.
| hour | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|
| CLss/F day 0 | 9.3 (3.1 to 25.5) |
| CLss/F day 21 | 13.9 (3.2 to 416.7) |
This evaluates the short-term impact of Nuvaring on virologic suppression in participants who have been administered Nuvaring alone or together with EFV or ATV/r by measuring proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels \<40 copies/mL at study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and study day 21 (three weeks after vaginal ring placement). An FDA-approved HIV-1 RNA assay was required.
| proportion of participants | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at day 0 | 0.22 (0.07 to 0.44) | 0.93 (0.76 to 0.99) | 0.89 (0.72 to 0.98) |
| Proportion with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at day 21 | 0.17 (0.05 to 0.37) | 0.85 (0.65 to 0.96) | 0.85 (0.66 to 0.96) |
This evaluates toxicity and safety of NuvaRing alone, NuvaRing with EFV, and NuvaRing with ATV/r. Signs/symptoms were graded using the DAIDS AE Grading Table was used. Participants with sign(s)/symptom(s) of grade 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (potentially life-threatening) or 5 (death) are included in the percentage. Relationship to study treatment was determined by the study co-chairs and DAIDS clinical representative.
| Percent of Participants | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Signs and Symptoms of Grade 2 or Higher Deemed Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment | 7.4 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
This evaluates alterations in progesterone levels due to the potential PK interaction between NuvaRing and the ARVs EFV and ATV/r by examining progesterone levels at study days 0 (before vaginal ring placement), 7, 14, and 21 (before vaginal ring removal), and study day 28, without regard to menstrual cycle status at study entry.
| proportion of participants | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 0 | 0.08 (0.01 to 0.26) | 0.04 (0.00 to 0.20) | 0.25 (0.10 to 0.47) |
| Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 7 | 0.08 (0.01 to 0.27) | 0.24 (0.09 to 0.45) | 0.08 (0.01 to 0.27) |
| Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 14 | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.14) | 0.04 (0.00 to 0.21) | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.14) |
| Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 21 | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.14) | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.14) | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.14) |
| Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 28 | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.14) | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.14) | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.14) |
Collected over From Day 0 to Day 28.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| NuvaRing and no ART | 0/27 (0%) | 0/27 (0%) | 10/27 (37%) |
| NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | 0/28 (0%) | 0/28 (0%) | 20/28 (71.4%) |
| NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs | 0/28 (0%) | 0/28 (0%) | 18/28 (64.3%) |
| Event | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Menstruation normalInvestigations | 1/27 | 5/28 | 8/28 |
| Vaginal dischargeReproductive system and breast disorders | 4/27 | 8/28 | 4/28 |
| Vaginal haemorrhageReproductive system and breast disorders | 0/27 | 4/28 | 1/28 |
| Vulvovaginal pruritusReproductive system and breast disorders | 2/27 | 4/28 | 1/28 |
| Blood sodium decreasedInvestigations | 3/27 | 3/28 | 2/28 |
| Bacterial vaginosisInfections and infestations | 1/27 | 3/28 | 1/28 |
| Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations | 0/27 | 0/28 | 3/28 |
| Blood glucose increasedInvestigations | 2/27 | 0/28 | 1/28 |
| Vulvovaginal candidiasisInfections and infestations | 1/27 | 2/28 | 0/28 |
| Blood bicarbonate decreasedInvestigations | 0/27 | 2/28 | 0/28 |
All participants enrolled.
| Age, Continuous(years) | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 32 (22 to 48) | 36 (17 to 55) | 36 (22 to 50) | 35 (17 to 55) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 27 | 28 | 29 | 84 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Non-Hispanic | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Black Non-Hispanic | 12 | 18 | 14 | 44 |
| Hispanic (Regardless of Race) | 11 | 9 | 9 | 29 |
| Asian, Pacific Islander | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | NuvaRing and no ART | NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs | NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| United States | 5 | 14 | 15 | 34 |
| Botswana | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Brazil | 3 | 6 | 5 | 14 |
| South Africa | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kenya | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Thailand | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 |
| Peru | 6 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections