CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01898234Updated Jul 12, 2013

Dialysis Membranes and Hemodynamic Tolerance

An interventional study of Revaclear and Helixone high flux in Dialysis Membranes and Hemodynamic Tolerance, sponsored by Ospedale Regionale di Locarno. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 95 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-12.

Sponsored by Ospedale Regionale di Locarno · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 95 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

High- and low-flux dialysis membranes made of different materials may correlate with various hemodynamic tolerance profiles. This study aims to investigate hemodynamic response and incidence of hypotensive episodes by comparing some of the most commonly used high- and low-flux dialyzers.

Methodology:

The study was designed as an open label, randomized, cross-over investigation, including 25 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Four polysulfone dialyzers of 1.8 m2, A (Revaclear, Gambro), B (Helixone high flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta, BBraun) and D (Helixone low flux, Fresenius), were compared with each other. The hemodynamic profile was assessed with a non-invasive technique and patients were asked to provide tolerance feedback through a questionnaire.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dialysis Membranes and Hemodynamic Tolerance

Keywords

  • Hemodynamics
  • intradialytic hypotension
  • subjective tolerance
  • dialysis membranes
  • high flux
  • low flux
  • hemodialysis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ospedale Regionale di Locarno is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 95 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age 18 and older
  • ability to understand the information presented and sign the informed consent
  • chronic hemodialysis for at least 8 weeks
  • stable dialysis prescriptions and modality in the 2 weeks prior to protocol implementation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • mental illness;
  • inability to understand the information presented and sign the informed consent;
  • acute disease requiring hospitalization at the time of patient enrolment
  • pregnancy and breast feeding
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Revaclear

    Device: Revaclear

  • Experimental
    Helixone high flux

    Device: Helixone high flux

  • Experimental
    Xevonta

    Device: Xevonta

  • Experimental
    Helixone low flux

    Device: Helixone low flux

Interventions

  • DeviceRevaclear

    Four polysulfone dialyzers of 1.8 m2, A (Revaclear, Gambro), B (Helixone high flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta, BBraun) and D (Helixone low flux, Fresenius), were compared with each other

    Also known as: -Revaclear, Gambro 1.8 m2

  • DeviceHelixone high flux

    Four polysulfone dialyzers of 1.8 m2, A (Revaclear, Gambro), B (Helixone high flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta, BBraun) and D (Helixone low flux, Fresenius), were compared with each other

    Also known as: Helixone high flux, Fresenius 1.8 m2

  • DeviceXevonta

    Four polysulfone dialyzers of 1.8 m2, A (Revaclear, Gambro), B (Helixone high flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta, BBraun) and D (Helixone low flux, Fresenius), were compared with each other

    Also known as: Xevonta, BBraun 1.8 m2

  • DeviceHelixone low flux

    Four polysulfone dialyzers of 1.8 m2, A (Revaclear, Gambro), B (Helixone high flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta, BBraun) and D (Helixone low flux, Fresenius), were compared with each other

    Also known as: Helixone low flux, Fresenius 1.8 m2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. comparative evaluation of mean hemodynamic parameters (i.e. systolic and diastolic blood pressure, peripheral resistance and cardiac output) during dialysis

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. comparative evaluation of subjective tolerance across the various membranes

    As to the assessment of subjective tolerance, we decided to administer the questionnaire designed by Cruz et al. \[Cruz DN, Mahnensmith RL, Brickel HM, Perazella MA. Midodrine and cool dialysate are effective therapies for symptomatic intradialytic hypotension. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1999 Mag;33(5):920-926\] then modified by Teruel et al. \[Teruel JL, Martins J, Merino JL, Fernández Lucas M, Rivera M, Marcén R, et al. Temperature of the dialysis bath and hemodialysis tolerance. Nefrología: PublicaciónOficial De La Sociedad Española Nefrologia. 2006;26(4):461-468\] and to integrate it with a 1 to 10 numerical scale to assess patient well-being

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. comparative evaluation of Kt/V and of beta-2 microglobulin removal

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. comparative analysis of the incidence of symptomatic and non-symptomatic systolic pressure drops (> 20 mmHg)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ospedale Regionale di Locarno
    Locarno, Ticino 6928, Switzerland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 12, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01898234
Lead sponsor
Ospedale Regionale di Locarno
Responsible party
Luca Gabutti, MD (Prof, Head of Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Regionale di Locarno) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 12, 2013
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Jan 2013
Completion
Jan 2013
Last update
Jul 12, 2013

Study contacts

Luca Gabutti, MD
principal investigator · Ospedale Regionale Locarno
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion