ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01897870HomeCoMeUpdated Feb 23, 2016

The Effect of a Pharmacist Home Visit on Drug-related Problems Post-discharge.

An interventional study of HomeCoMe-program in Adverse Drug Event, Readmission and Patient Compliance, sponsored by H.T. Ensing, PharmD, MSc. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-23.

Sponsored by H.T. Ensing, PharmD, MSc · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

the purpose of this study is to determine the the effect of a home-based medication management program on drug-related problems post-discharge.

Read the detailed description

Inaccuracy of medication histories and lack of knowledge on actual medication use results in confusion about medication regimens and medication mismanagement before- during - and after hospital admission. This phenomenon accounts for many readmissions, longer duration of admission and preventable and serious Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) as a result of Drug Related Problems (DRPs). Several studies show that discharge medication reconciliation (MR) and counseling by a pharmacy employee reduces the amount of discrepancies in the discharge prescription lists. Still, no unequivocal effect of MR on the occurrence of DRPs after discharge has been shown. This is due to a shift in underlying potential harmful discrepancies from mainly patient based (unintended nonadherence) to mainly system based (eg dispensing errors) and might be explained by (1) suboptimal transfer of information (2) an overload of information during a stressful situation and (3) difficulty to implement changes in medication at home. Therefore the reduction of DRPs, improvement of patients' medication knowledge and initial adherence can probably most effectively be addressed in a multifaceted integrated transmural intervention. Repetition of important information is the key to success. Moreover, the first weeks following hospital discharge are most crucial in preventing drug-related problems as patients could slip back in old medication schemes, or new problems may arise, such as emerging ADEs due to medication changes made during hospitalization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adverse Drug Event
  • Readmission
  • Patient Compliance

Keywords

  • continuity of care
  • medicines management
  • home visit
  • drug-related problems
03

In context

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

445 studies on the registry are indexed under Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 103 across 260 interventional studies indexed under Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions.

Browse Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with H.T. Ensing, PharmD, MSc as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient uses more than three prescribed systemic drugs intended for chronic use at admission and discharge
  • patient has an expected length of stay of 48 hours or longer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted for scheduled chemotherapy
  • Patients admitted for radiation therapy
  • Patients admitted for transplantation
  • Patients transferred from another hospital
  • Patients transferred from another non-eligible ward within the same hospital
  • No informed consent signed
  • A live expectancy less than 6 months
  • Inability to be counselled (e.g. cognitive dysfunction, language constraints who cannot be solved with an interpreter)
  • Discharge to a nursing home (presuming dependence on medication administration)
  • If patients' community pharmacy is not participating in this study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HomeCoMe-program group

    the arm receiving the pharmacist home visit

    Behavioral: HomeCoMe-program

Interventions

  • BehavioralHomeCoMe-program

    A home visit by patients own community pharmacist within seven days after hospital discharge. The community pharmacist will perform a semi-structured interview on (1) use of the prescribed medication, (2) ADEs, (3) adherence issues, by (A) assessing patient's needs and concerns around his pharmacotherapy, (B) identifying and solving obstacles for medicines intake, (C) checking on the need for a compliance aid, (D) collecting spare medication and finally (4) knowledge on medication use, when to take which medicine and why, and medication changes made during the hospitalisation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Identifying and solving adverse drug events (ADEs) and other drug-related problems (DRPs) post-discharge

    The total number of assessed and solved ADEs post-discharge will be measured. Assessing and solving ADEs takes place during the pharmacist home visit. Using START-STOPP criteria on patients medication records, ADEs will also be compared between the intervention and usual care group.

    Time frame: within 7 days post-discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement of adherence to medication at hospital discharge

    The "medication possession ratio" will be calculated retrospectively from pharmacy dispensing data after 6 months to investigate patient's adherence and compared between the intervention and control group.

    Time frame: up to 6 months after discharge

  2. Patient assessment of medication knowledge at time of home visit

    At time of the home visit patients are asked about their knowledge (e.g. indication, dose regime, etc) regarding the medication they are taking. Knowledge is scored and lack of knowledge is solved by teaching the patient.

    Time frame: within 7 days after discharge

  3. Types of interventions made at the pharmacist home visit

    The types of intervention the pharmacist works on during the 7 day follow-up home visit are assessed.

    Time frame: within 7 days after discharge

  4. Patient satisfaction with the pharmacist home visit

    The satisfaction survey consists of 13 interview questions, where the subject subjectively scores each question on a four-point scale, developed specifically for this study.

    Time frame: Immediately after receiving the home visit

  5. Assessment of patient reported health rating

    Patient are asked by telephone to report their health on a scale from 1 (worst imaginable health) to 10 (best imaginable health). Number are compared between the intervention and control group.

    Time frame: at 14 days after discharge

  6. General practitioners satisfaction with the pharmacist home visit

    The satisfaction survey consists of 13 interview questions, where the subject subjectively scores each question on a four-point scale, developed specifically for this study.

    Time frame: Immediately after the home visit is executed

  7. Assessment of patient reported health rating

    Patient are asked by telephone to report their health on a scale from 1 (worst imaginable health) to 10 (best imaginable health). Number are compared between the intervention and control group.

    Time frame: at 42 days after discharge

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zorgapotheken Flevoland
    Almere Stad, Flevoland 1315RA, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schnipper JL, Kirwin JL, Cotugno MC, Wahlstrom SA, Brown BA, Tarvin E, Kachalia A, Horng M, Roy CL, McKean SC, Bates DW. Role of pharmacist counseling in preventing adverse drug events after hospitalization. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):565-71. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.565. PubMed 16534045 ↗
  • Al-Rashed SA, Wright DJ, Roebuck N, Sunter W, Chrystyn H. The value of inpatient pharmaceutical counselling to elderly patients prior to discharge. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Dec;54(6):657-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01707.x. PubMed 12492615 ↗
  • Kwint HF, Faber A, Gussekloo J, Bouvy ML. The contribution of patient interviews to the identification of drug-related problems in home medication review. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Dec;37(6):674-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01370.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3. PubMed 22861493 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2013, a primary completion of Feb 2016 and a completion of Feb 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 2, 2013
First posted
Jul 12, 2013
Start
Nov 2013
Primary completionActual
Feb 2016
CompletionActual
Feb 2016
Last update
Feb 23, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01897870
Lead sponsor
H.T. Ensing, PharmD, MSc
Collaborators
Zorggroep Almere, Flevoziekenhuis
Responsible party
H.T. Ensing, PharmD, MSc (PharmD, MSc, Zorggroep Almere) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 12, 2013
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Feb 2016
Completion
Feb 2016
Last update
Feb 23, 2016

Study contacts

Marcel L Bouvy, Prof, PharmD, PhD
principal investigator · UIPS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion