CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01896128Updated Nov 4, 2019Results posted

Combining Armodafinil With Neuro-rehabilitation to Improve Neurological Recovery and Reduce Disability Post-Stroke

A Phase 2 interventional study of Armodafinil and Placebo in Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident and Hemiparesis, sponsored by Burke Rehabilitation Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-04.

Sponsored by Burke Rehabilitation Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Armodafinil is an FDA approved medication with wakefulness-promoting properties. It is a relatively safe agent with interesting neurochemical effects on the catecholamine system, producing an improvement in cognitive function, particularly working memory in humans. When combined with intensive task-related training, armodafinil may accelerate motor recovery in chronic stroke patients.

The primary aim of this study is to determine whether administration of armodafinil during subacute post-stroke rehabilitation will augment cortical plasticity and enhance motor recovery. The primary hypothesis suggests that cortical plasticity will be enhanced by armodafinil and, therefore, will induce an improvement in motor function and better performances on measures of motor control.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Cerebrovascular Accident
  • Hemiparesis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke
  • CVA
  • cerebrovascular accident
  • hemiparesis
  • impairment
  • motor recovery
  • neuroplasticity
  • nuvigil
  • armodafinil
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Burke Rehabilitation Hospital is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • First clinical stroke, either cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Severe hemiparesis as measured by a Fugl-Meyer motor scale score of 0-25
  • Screening Motricity Index score of 0-83
  • Date of stroke onset between 7 to 21 days prior to study inclusion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18
  • Previous clinical stroke
  • Pregnant and/or nursing patients
  • Major psychiatric history, including psychosis and history of substance abuse
  • Dementia
  • Known CNS pathology such as brain tumor
  • Significant language dysfunction or severe neglect that hinders comprehension, participation, and barrier to testing
  • Seizures
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)
  • Mitral valve prolapse (MVP)
  • Severe chronic renal failure or severe hepatic failure
  • History or current use of anti-epileptic medications, psychostimulants, or neuroleptics
  • Current use of diazepam, phenytoin, propranolol, tricyclic antidepressants, steroidal contraceptives, cyclosporine, or theophylline
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Armodafinil

    150 mg armodafinil administered 2 hours prior to start of therapeutic regimen for 10 consecutive days

    Drug: Armodafinil

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    inactive agent administered 2 hours prior to start of therapeutic regimen for 10 consecutive days

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugArmodafinil

    Also known as: Nuvigil

  • DrugPlacebo

    inactive pill manufactured to mimic Armodafinil 150 mg tablet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Function From Baseline to Day 100

    Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale is an index to assess the sensorimotor impairment in individuals who have had a stroke.The maximum possible score in Fugl-Meyer scale is 226, which corresponds to full sensory-motor recovery. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale is an ordinal scale that has 3 points for each item. A zero score is given for the item if the subject cannot do the task. A score of 1 is given when the task is performed partially and a score of 2 is given when the task is performed fully. However, reflex activity is measured using 2 points only, with a score of 0 or 2 for absence and presence of reflex respectively. The five domains assessed by Fugl-Meyer scale are: * Motor function (Maximum score in upper limb = 66;Maximum score in lower limb = 34) * Sensory function (Maximum score = 24) * Balance (Maximum score = 14) * Range of motion of joints (Maximum score = 44) * Joint pain (Maximum score = 44)

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 100

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) From Baseline to Day 100

    The FIM is used by health care practitioners to assess and grade the functional status of a person based on the level of assistance he or she requires. The motor subscale includes:Eating,Grooming,BathingDressing, upper body,Dressing, lower body Toileting Bladder management Bowel management Transfers - bed/chair/wheelchairTransfers - toiletTransfers - bath/showerWalk/wheelchairStairs The cognition subscale includes:Comprehension ExpressionSocial interaction Problem solvingMemory Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1(worse) to a score of 7(better). The total score for the FIM motor subscale (the sum of motor subscale ) will be a value between 13 and 91.The total score for the FIM cognition subscale (the sum of the individual cognition subscale items) will be a value between 5(worse outcome) \& 35(best outcome).The total score for the FIM instrument (the sum of subscale scores) will be a value between 18(worse outcome) \& 126 (best outcome)

    Time frame: Day 100

  2. Timed 3-Minute Walk Test From Baseline to Day 100

    The 3MWT is a simple measure of the distance a person can walk in three minutes. Rest breaks are allowed if needed. The person is encouraged to walk as fast as they can, safely, for two minutes. Walking aids can be used as needed e.g. for elderly people with a record made of walking aid used.A clear course such as a hallway with cones or similar to mark an approximately 15m "out and back" course\[8\], stopwatch, pen and paper or a device to record distance walked.

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 100

  3. NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

    The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, or NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a tool used by healthcare providers to objectively quantify the impairment caused by a stroke. The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score is indicative of some level of impairment. The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0 Score. Stroke severity 0 No stroke symptoms 1-4 Minor stroke 5-15 Moderate stroke 16-20 Moderate to severe stroke 21-42 Severe stroke

    Time frame: Baseline Day 100

  4. 9-Hole Peg Test

    9 HOLE PEG TEST * Administered by asking the client to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and place them into the holes on the board, as quickly as possible * Participants must then remove the pegs from the holes, one by one, and replace them back into the container * The board should be placed at the client's midline, with the container holding the pegs oriented towards the hand being tested * Only the hand being evaluated should perform the test * Hand not being evaluated is permitted to hold the edge of the board in order to provide stability * Scores are based on the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds * Alternative scoring - the number of pegs placed in 50 or 100 seconds can be recorded. In this case, results are expressed as the number of pegs placed per second * Stopwatch should be started from the moment the participant touches the first peg until the moment the last peg hits the container

    Time frame: Baseline & Day 100

07

Results

Posted Nov 4, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArmodafinilPlacebo
Started811
Completed58
Not completed33
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject33

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Function From Baseline to Day 100

Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale is an index to assess the sensorimotor impairment in individuals who have had a stroke.The maximum possible score in Fugl-Meyer scale is 226, which corresponds to full sensory-motor recovery. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale is an ordinal scale that has 3 points for each item. A zero score is given for the item if the subject cannot do the task. A score of 1 is given when the task is performed partially and a score of 2 is given when the task is performed fully. However, reflex activity is measured using 2 points only, with a score of 0 or 2 for absence and presence of reflex respectively. The five domains assessed by Fugl-Meyer scale are: * Motor function (Maximum score in upper limb = 66;Maximum score in lower limb = 34) * Sensory function (Maximum score = 24) * Balance (Maximum score = 14) * Range of motion of joints (Maximum score = 44) * Joint pain (Maximum score = 44)

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 100
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Function From Baseline to Day 100
units on a scaleArmodafinilPlacebo
Baseline14.8 ± 8.612.8 ± 7.0
Day10039.7 ± 15.037.8 ± 20.9
SecondaryChange in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) From Baseline to Day 100

The FIM is used by health care practitioners to assess and grade the functional status of a person based on the level of assistance he or she requires. The motor subscale includes:Eating,Grooming,BathingDressing, upper body,Dressing, lower body Toileting Bladder management Bowel management Transfers - bed/chair/wheelchairTransfers - toiletTransfers - bath/showerWalk/wheelchairStairs The cognition subscale includes:Comprehension ExpressionSocial interaction Problem solvingMemory Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1(worse) to a score of 7(better). The total score for the FIM motor subscale (the sum of motor subscale ) will be a value between 13 and 91.The total score for the FIM cognition subscale (the sum of the individual cognition subscale items) will be a value between 5(worse outcome) \& 35(best outcome).The total score for the FIM instrument (the sum of subscale scores) will be a value between 18(worse outcome) \& 126 (best outcome)

Time frame:
Day 100
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) From Baseline to Day 100
units on a scaleArmodafinilPlacebo
Baseline55.5 ± 17.852.4 ± 14.5
Day10089.2 ± 21.790.9 ± 17.4
SecondaryTimed 3-Minute Walk Test From Baseline to Day 100

The 3MWT is a simple measure of the distance a person can walk in three minutes. Rest breaks are allowed if needed. The person is encouraged to walk as fast as they can, safely, for two minutes. Walking aids can be used as needed e.g. for elderly people with a record made of walking aid used.A clear course such as a hallway with cones or similar to mark an approximately 15m "out and back" course\[8\], stopwatch, pen and paper or a device to record distance walked.

Time frame:
Day 1, Day 100
Reported as:
Mean · feet
Timed 3-Minute Walk Test From Baseline to Day 100
feetArmodafinilPlacebo
Baseline49.4 ± 43.5152.5 ± 89.2
Day100152.5 ± 89.2103.3 ± 73.8
SecondaryNIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, or NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a tool used by healthcare providers to objectively quantify the impairment caused by a stroke. The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score is indicative of some level of impairment. The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0 Score. Stroke severity 0 No stroke symptoms 1-4 Minor stroke 5-15 Moderate stroke 16-20 Moderate to severe stroke 21-42 Severe stroke

Time frame:
Baseline Day 100
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
units on a scaleArmodafinilPlacebo
Baseline11.9 ± 3.913.4 ± 3.3
Day1006.7 ± 2.57.3 ± 2.7
Secondary9-Hole Peg Test

9 HOLE PEG TEST * Administered by asking the client to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and place them into the holes on the board, as quickly as possible * Participants must then remove the pegs from the holes, one by one, and replace them back into the container * The board should be placed at the client's midline, with the container holding the pegs oriented towards the hand being tested * Only the hand being evaluated should perform the test * Hand not being evaluated is permitted to hold the edge of the board in order to provide stability * Scores are based on the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds * Alternative scoring - the number of pegs placed in 50 or 100 seconds can be recorded. In this case, results are expressed as the number of pegs placed per second * Stopwatch should be started from the moment the participant touches the first peg until the moment the last peg hits the container

Time frame:
Baseline & Day 100
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds
9-Hole Peg Test
SecondsArmodafinilPlacebo
Baseline34.0 ± 8.834.2 ± 9.5
Day10027.3 ± 6.729.7 ± 6.1

Adverse events

Collected over 100 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Armodafinil0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)
Placebo0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventArmodafinilPlacebo
NervesousnessNervous system disorders1/80/11

Baseline characteristics

Of a total 19 subjects enrolled: 8 subjects were randomly allocated to the Armodafinil arm and 11 subjects to the placebo arm. Three subjects for each arm of the study withdrew from the study. At day 100, there were 5 subjects of the Armodafinil group and 8 subjects of the placebo group that completed the study

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ArmodafinilPlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years6511
>=65 years268
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ArmodafinilPlaceboTotal
Mean65.4 ± 12.467.5 ± 9.566.45 ± 10.95
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ArmodafinilPlaceboTotal
Female369
Male5510
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ArmodafinilPlaceboTotal
United States81119
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Burke Rehabilitation Hospital
    White Plains, New York 10605, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 4, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01896128
Lead sponsor
Burke Rehabilitation Hospital
Collaborators
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Responsible party
Pasquale Fonzetti, MD, PhD (Associate Director, Memory Evaluation and Treatment Service, Burke Rehabilitation Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 11, 2013
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Results posted
Nov 4, 2019
Last update
Nov 4, 2019

Study contacts

Pasquale Fonzetti, MD, PhD
principal investigator · The Burke Rehabilitation Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion