CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01894763Updated Jul 10, 2013

Prospective Comparison of Large vs. Small Diameter Esophageal Stents for Palliation of Malignant Dysphagia

A Phase 1 interventional study of Self-expandable metal stent in Esophageal Cancer, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in Kenya. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-10.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Esophageal cancer often causes difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) that can be relieved by placement of a stent (a flexible, expandable tube that props open the blockage caused by the cancer). Stents are effective but can cause complications. Stents come in different diameters. The purpose of this study is to learn if stents of different diameters are more or less effective for treatment of dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, randomized study was conducted at Tenwek Hospital in Bomet, Kenya, and was approved by the hospital's institutional review board (IRB) as well as the Kenya Medical Research Institute's Ethical Review Committee. Participants with dysphagia were recruited and provided signed informed consent prior to endoscopy. During endoscopy and after dilation of an obstructing esophageal tumor sufficient to permit passage of an endoscope, eligible participants were enrolled and randomized to receive either an 18 mm shaft/23 mm flange or 23 mm shaft/28 mm flange partially covered Ultraflex esophageal stent (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusets, USA). Stents were either 10 or 12 cm in length, and the endoscopist chose a stent length based on the length of the malignant stricture. One stent was placed in each subject. Follow-up was then obtained at scheduled intervals after stent placement (7 and 28 days, 3 months, then every 3 months), until the participant's death. Earlier follow-up visits were arranged if participants reported any new health concerns.

Block randomization was performed using the sealed envelope technique, with 10 participants in each block; none of the study personnel at Tenwek Hospital had knowledge of the randomization sequence. Allocation was concealed from participants, caregivers, and study personnel until randomization occurred during an endoscopic procedure. After randomization, stent diameters were known to the endoscopy staff and listed in the medical record. All randomized participants correctly received a stent of the allocated diameter, and remained blinded to the stent diameter they received.

At baseline and each follow-up visit body weight was recorded, as well as Karnofsky performance status score, dysphagia score (0=normal, no dysphagia; 1=can swallow most foods; 2=can swallow a soft diet; 3=can swallow fluids only; 4=unable to swallow saliva), current medications, and the presence or absence of 15 symptoms and 9 diagnoses (weakness, fever, vomiting, vomiting blood, melena, weak voice, difficulty breathing, cough, sputum, palpitations, heartburn, chest pain, hiccoughs, recurrent dysphagia, abdominal pain; anemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, esophago-respiratory fistula, arrhythmia, pneumonia, metastases, stent occlusion, stent migration, gastroesophageal reflux disease). In addition, all interval clinic visits, test results, endoscopy reports, and hospitalizations were reviewed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Esophageal Cancer

Keywords

  • esophagus
  • cancer
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥ 18 years
  • dysphagia due to unresectable esophageal cancer
  • participant resides within 50 km of Tenwek Hospital
  • tumor is ≤ 9 cm in length and > 2 cm distal to the upper esophageal sphincter (UES)
  • no esophago-respiratory fistula (ERF) or suspected perforation is present

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to provide written informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Small-diameter stent

    Placement of a 23 mm self-expandable metal stent

    Device: Self-expandable metal stent

  • Active comparator
    Large-diameter stent

    Placement of a 28-mm self-expandable metal stent

    Device: Self-expandable metal stent

Interventions

  • DeviceSelf-expandable metal stent

    Placement of a self-expandable metal stent in the esophagus

    Also known as: Ultraflex Esophageal Stents

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Relief of dysphagia

    Number of participants with improvement in dysphagia score to \<2

    Time frame: 1 month following stent placement

  2. Complications

    Number of participants who experience stent-related symptoms (including chest pain, recurrent dysphagia, hematemesis, melena, palpitations) or complications (including gastrointestinal hemorrhage, esophago-respiratory fistula, stent migration, stent occlusion) from the time of stent placement until death or 5-year follow-up.

    Time frame: from stent placement to death or 5 years of follow-up, whichever comes first

  3. Mortality

    Time (in days) from stent placement to death, assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis

    Time frame: from stent placement to death or 5 years of follow-up, whichever comes first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Endoscopic re-intervention

    Number of participants undergoing repeat endoscopy to diagnose or treat a stent-related problem at any time from stent placement to death or 5 year follow-up.

    Time frame: from stent placement to death or 5 years of follow-up, whichever comes first

  2. performance status

    Karnofsky performance status, assessed by Kaplan Meier analysis, from stent placement to death or 5-year follow-up.

    Time frame: from stent placement to death or 5 years of follow-up, whichever comes first

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tenwek Hospital
    Bomet, Kenya
08

References and documents

Publications

  • White RE, Chepkwony R, Mwachiro M, Burgert SL, Enders FT, Topazian M. Randomized Trial of Small-diameter Versus Large-diameter Esophageal Stents for Palliation of Malignant Esophageal Obstruction. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;49(8):660-5. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000333. PubMed 25992812 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01894763
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
Tenwek Hospital, Bomet, Kenya
Responsible party
Mark Topazian (Professor of Medicine, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2013
Start date
Sep 2003
Primary completion
May 2009
Completion
May 2009
Last update
Jul 10, 2013

Study contacts

Russell White, M.D.
principal investigator · Tenwek Hospital, Bomet, Kenya

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion