CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01891994Updated Apr 25, 2023Results posted

Extended Dosing With Eltrombopag for Severe Aplastic Anemia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Eltrombopag in Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA), sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-25.

Sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
2 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

  • Eltrombopag is a drug being tested for treating severe aplastic anemia. It can help improve blood counts in these patients. However, researchers do not know how long the drug can and should be taken for this type of anemia.

Objectives:

  • To look at whether 6 months of treatment with eltrombopag can improve patient s blood counts.

Eligibility:

  • Individuals at least 2 years of age who are taking eltrombopag for severe aplastic anemia.

Design:

  • Participants will take eltrombopag by mouth once a day for 6 months.
  • Blood samples will be collected every 2 weeks for the first 6 months. Bone marrow samples will be collected at 3 and 6 months. These samples will look at the effects of the study drug on the marrow.
  • Participants will continue to take the study drug for as long as it is effective and if the side effects are not severe.
Read the detailed description

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening blood disease that can be successfully treated with immunosuppressive drug regimens or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, 20-40% of patients are ineligible for transplant due to lack of an appropriate donor, age, or comorbidities. Immunosuppression can be more broadly utilized, but about 1/3 of patients do not respond to a single course of horse ATG and cyclosporine and have persistent severe cytopenias. Among patients who do respond to immunosuppression, responses may be partial, with persistent thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and/or anemia. About 30% of responding patients either relapse or are dependent on continued cyclosporine administration. Patients with refractory severe cytopenias are at risk of dying from infection or bleeding, and they require regular platelet and/or red blood cell transfusions, which are expensive and inconvenient, Patients with refractory SAA are also at risk for progression to other hematologic disorders, including myelodysplasia and leukemia.

Thrombopoietin (TPO) was first identified as the principal protein regulating platelet production, and it stimulates the proliferation of megakaryocytes and release of platelets. TPO was later shown to stimulate proliferation of more primitive bone marrow stem and progenitor cells in vitro and in animal models, suggesting it could have an impact of production of red and white blood cells as well as platelets.

The 2nd generation oral small molecule TPO-agonist eltrombopag (Promacta ) has been shown to increase platelets in healthy subjects and in thrombocytopenic patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infection. Eltrombopag has been well-tolerated in clinical trials, and unlike recombinant TPO, it does not induce autoantibodies. Eltrombopag received FDA accelerated approval on November 20, 2008 for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy. In November 2012, FDA approval was received for hepatitis C associated thrombocytopenia.

We conducted a pilot dose finding study in patients with severe aplastic anemia who had refractory thrombocytopenia following standard immunosuppressive therapy. Patients began at a dose of 50 mg/day and escalated every two weeks to a maximum dose of 150 mg/day. We reported that 11 of 25 patients (44%) achieved hematological response in at least one lineage following 12 weeks of dose-escalating eltrombopag therapy, with minimal toxicity. Responding patients as assessed at 12 weeks were invited to continue on drug in an extension phase. With a median follow-up of 27 months on drug, 7 eventually became tri-lineage responders. Nine became transfusion-independent for platelets (median increase in platelet count 34,000/micro l), six had improved hemoglobin levels (median increase of 3.8g/dL), including three previously dependent on red cell transfusions achieving transfusion-independence, and eight exhibiting increased neutrophil counts (median increase 590 cells/mico L). Serial bone marrow biopsies demonstrated normalization of tri-lineage hematopoiesis in responders, without increased fibrosis.

In the previous study, response assessment occurred at 12 weeks, and patients not fulfilling response criteria at that time had the drug discontinued. Several patients began to have detectable changes in transfusion requirements or blood counts by 12 weeks, but did not fulfill response criteria by that time point and therefore had to discontinue eltrombopag. Other patients who barely met response criteria at 12 weeks showed very marked further improvements in blood counts in all lineages during the extension phase, in some cases not reaching maximal responses until one year after initiating eltrombopag. We hypothesize that a larger fraction of patients may respond if eltrombopag is continued for longer than 12 weeks.

We, therefore propose a follow-up Phase 2 study giving eltrombopag treatment for 24 weeks prior to definitive response assessment, and initiating study medication at a fixed dose of 150 mg/day (75 mg /day for individuals of East Asian ethnicity), given lack of toxicity at that dose in the prior study, and no evidence for response in any patient during dose escalation prior to reaching this dose. Responses will be assessed in all three lineages. Subjects with platelet, red cell, and/or neutrophil responses at 24 weeks may continue study medication (extended access) until they meet off study criteria.

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of 6 months of eltrombopag administration in improving bone marrow function in SAA patients with persistent severe cytopenias refractory to treatment with immunosuppressive treatment.

Secondary objectives include assessment of relapse or clonal evolution, pre-treatment characteristics predicting response, and the impact of treatment and treatment response on quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA)

Keywords

  • Cytokine
  • Hematopoiesis
  • Autoimmunity
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Neutropenia
03

In context

Anemia

1,733 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia; 246 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 94 across 1,291 interventional studies indexed under Anemia.

Browse Anemia studies →

Lead sponsor

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) is the lead sponsor of 1,117 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 57 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Previous diagnosis of refractory severe aplastic anemia and following at least one treatment course of immunosuppression with a regimen containing antithymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab or cyclophosphamide.
  • One or more of the following three clinically-significant cytopenias: platelet count less than or equal to 30,000/micro L or platelet-transfusion-dependence (requiring at least 4 platelet transfusions in the 8 weeks prior to study entry); neutrophil count less than 500/micro L; hemoglobin less than 9.0 g/dL or red cell transfusion-dependence (requiring at least 4 units of PRBCs in the eight weeks prior to study entry)
  • Age greater than or equal to 2 years old
  • Weight > 12 kg

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy
  • Evidence of a clonal disorder on cytogenetics performed within 12 weeks of study entry.
  • Creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL
  • Direct Bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL
  • SGOT or SGPT >5 times the upper limit of normal
  • Hypersensitivity to eltrombopag or its components\<TAB>
  • Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant or are unwilling to take oral contraceptives or refrain from pregnancy if of childbearing potential
  • Unable to understand the investigational nature of the study or give informed consent
  • Moribund status or concurrent hepatic, renal, cardiac, neurologic, pulmonary, infectious, or metabolic disease of such severity that it would preclude the patient s ability to tolerate protocol therapy, or that death within 7-10 days is likely
  • Treatment with ATG, cyclophophamide or alemtuzamab within 6 months of study entry.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Eltrombopag

    Administration of eltrombopag at a dose of 150mg/day for 6 months

    Drug: Eltrombopag

Interventions

  • DrugEltrombopag

    Oral administration of eltrombopag 150mg/day (75 mg/day for East Asian ancestry) for 6 months

    Also known as: Promacta

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Drug Response as Defined by Clinically-signficant Hematologic Improvements

    Defined as unilineage or multilineage recovery by 1 or more of the following: 1) platelet response (increase to 20 × 103/μL above baseline or stable platelet counts with transfusion independence for a minimum of 8 weeks in those who were transfusion dependent on entry into the protocol); (2) erythroid response (when pretreatment hemoglobin was \<9 g/dL, defined as an increase in hemoglobin by 1.5 g/dL or, in transfused patients, a reduction in the units of packed red blood cell transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 transfusions for 8 consecutive weeks, compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks); and (3) neutrophil response (when pretreatment absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] of \<0.5 × 103/μL as at least a 100% increase in ANC, or an ANC increase \>0.5 × 103/μL, and the toxicity profile as measured using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events).

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Dec 4, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEltrombopag
Started40
Completed40
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Drug Response as Defined by Clinically-signficant Hematologic Improvements

Defined as unilineage or multilineage recovery by 1 or more of the following: 1) platelet response (increase to 20 × 103/μL above baseline or stable platelet counts with transfusion independence for a minimum of 8 weeks in those who were transfusion dependent on entry into the protocol); (2) erythroid response (when pretreatment hemoglobin was \<9 g/dL, defined as an increase in hemoglobin by 1.5 g/dL or, in transfused patients, a reduction in the units of packed red blood cell transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 transfusions for 8 consecutive weeks, compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks); and (3) neutrophil response (when pretreatment absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] of \<0.5 × 103/μL as at least a 100% increase in ANC, or an ANC increase \>0.5 × 103/μL, and the toxicity profile as measured using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events).

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Drug Response as Defined by Clinically-signficant Hematologic Improvements
ParticipantsEltrombopag
Number of Participants With Drug Response as Defined by Clinically-signficant Hematologic Improvements20

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Eltrombopag1/40 (2.5%)13/40 (32.5%)39/40 (97.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent serious events
EventEltrombopag
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/40
SepsisInfections and infestations2/40
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/40
Otitis mediaEar and labyrinth disorders1/40
ColitisGastrointestinal disorders1/40
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/40
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/40
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders1/40
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/40
DeathGeneral disorders1/40
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 180
Most frequent other events
EventEltrombopag
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders16/40
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations12/40
HeadacheNervous system disorders11/40
Ocular icterusBlood and lymphatic system disorders10/40
PetechiaeBlood and lymphatic system disorders9/40
Oedema peripheralCardiac disorders9/40
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders9/40
White blood cell count decreasedInvestigations9/40
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/40
DizzinessCardiac disorders8/40

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Eltrombopag
<=18 years9
Between 18 and 65 years25
>=65 years6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Eltrombopag
Female19
Male21
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Eltrombopag
Hispanic or Latino7
Not Hispanic or Latino33
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Eltrombopag
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian4
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1
Black or African American4
White25
More than one race4
Unknown or Not Reported2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhao Z, Sun Q, Sokoll LJ, Streiff M, Cheng Z, Grasmeder S, Townsley DM, Young NS, Dunbar CE, Winkler T. Eltrombopag mobilizes iron in patients with aplastic anemia. Blood. 2018 May 24;131(21):2399-2402. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-01-826784. Epub 2018 Apr 9. No abstract available. Erratum In: Blood. 2018 Jul 26;132(4):459. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-857870. PubMed 29632023 ↗
  • Winkler T, Fan X, Cooper J, Desmond R, Young DJ, Townsley DM, Scheinberg P, Grasmeder S, Larochelle A, Desierto M, Valdez J, Lotter J, Wu C, Shalhoub RN, Calvo KR, Young NS, Dunbar CE. Treatment optimization and genomic outcomes in refractory severe aplastic anemia treated with eltrombopag. Blood. 2019 Jun 13;133(24):2575-2585. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000478. Epub 2019 Apr 16. PubMed 30992268 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 25, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01891994
Lead sponsor
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2013
Start date
Jun 28, 2013
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2017
Completion
Aug 24, 2022
Results posted
Dec 4, 2018
Last update
Apr 25, 2023

Study contacts

Cynthia E Dunbar, M.D.
principal investigator · National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion