CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01879579MITIUpdated Oct 12, 2015Results posted

Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention

An interventional study of Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention in Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by NYU Langone Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-12.

Sponsored by NYU Langone Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine whether text message (and phone) communication can be effectively utilized to adjust long-acting insulin, compared to standard practice.

Read the detailed description

The current practice of insulin titration for diabetics requires multiple in-person clinic visits, during which a patient's long-acting insulin dose is adjusted until the optimal dose to control glycemia is reached. Finding this optimal dose can take weeks in an ideal setting, but often takes much longer in a busy urban clinic such as Bellevue Hospital Center. Relaying titration instructions to patients via phone and text message has the potential to decrease the titration timeline, thus reducing the number of clinic visits and the time it takes patients to reach their target blood glucose levels.

For this pilot project, study staff will recruit patients who are initiating long-acting insulin treatment or initiating the titration of their existing long acting insulin treatment at Bellevue Hospital Center's Adult Primary Care Center. Patients who volunteer to enroll and provide informed consent will be randomized to one of two arms (MITI or current best practice arm) at the time of enrollment and stratified by whether the patient is initiating insulin treatment or initiating the titration of his/her existing insulin dose. The study staff will provide a cell phone (for temporary use) to any patients who are randomized to the MITI arm and don't own a personal cell phone (or whose personal cell phone is not able to receive the Sense Health text messages). Patients will use the cell phone free of cost to participate in the intervention (receive Sense Health text messages, send their fasting blood glucose levels, and speak with the diabetes nurse and study staff.)

Patients in the MITI arm will receive automated text messages 5 weekdays per week, for up to 12 weeks, from Sense Health. These text messages will request the patient's fasting blood glucose level. The patient will reply with his/her fasting blood glucose value, which will be logged in password-protected accounts on www.sensehealth.com. The clinic's diabetes nurses will check each patient's fasting blood glucose level on www.sensehealth.com each weekday and call any patient with fasting blood glucose values \< 80 mg/dL and > 400 mg/dL. Each Thursday, patients will receive a phone call from a nurse, who will adjust the patient's insulin dose according to the study titration protocol. Each patient will continue to receive daily text messages and weekly phone calls until the first of three events occur: the patient reaches his/her optimal insulin dose for achieving glycemic control, 12 weeks elapse, or the patient withdraws from the study.

Patients in the current best practice arm (CBP) will attend scheduled clinic appointments during which a provider will review the patient's fasting blood glucose log and titrate the insulin dose according to current best practice.

Patients in both arms will continue receiving routine care, including HbA1c values every 3 months and other routine labs and measures as per standard of care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Insulin
  • Telemedicine
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 61 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health is the lead sponsor of 1,391 studies on the registry; 254 are open to participants now.

Of its 227 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 191 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Initiating long-acting insulin treatment or initiating the titration of long-acting insulin treatment
  • Speaks English or Spanish
  • Hemoglobin A1c > or = 8%
  • Able and willing to inject insulin
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Short-acting insulin treatment
  • Systemic glucocorticoids
  • Sustained elevated serum creatinine > or = 1.5 mg/dL for men and > or = 1.4 mg/dL for women
  • Hypoglycemia unawareness
  • Type 1 diabetes
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention

    Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention (MITI) arm patients will relay their fasting blood glucose levels to the study staff via text message. The patient will receive insulin titration instructions through a weekly phone call with a diabetes nurse.

    Other: Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention

  • No intervention
    Current Best Practice

    Current Best Practice (CBP) arm patients will be treated according to the current best practice of insulin titration. They will attend scheduled clinic visits during which the provider will review their blood glucose logs and provide insulin titration instructions.

Interventions

  • OtherMobile Insulin Titration Intervention

    Patients send their fasting blood glucose levels to the clinic diabetes nurses via text message each weekday. The diabetes nurses call each patient once a week to give insulin titration instructions to replace in-person clinic visits for insulin titration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Optimal Long-acting Insulin Dose

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Reach Optimal Long-acting Insulin Dose

    The time it takes a patient to reach his/her optimal long-acting insulin dose will be measured for both study arms.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Hemoglobin A1c

    Change in hemoglobin A1c

    Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks (approximately 3 months)

  3. Baseline Treatment Satisfaction

    The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire standard (DTSQs) will be used to measure the patient's satisfaction with diabetes treatment received prior to study participation. Scores on questionnaire range from 0 to 6: 0 = very dissatisfied, 6 = very satisfied.

    Time frame: baseline

  4. Treatment Satisfaction After Initiation of Insulin Titration

    The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire standard (DTSQs) will be used to measure the patient's satisfaction with diabetes treatment received since initiation of long-acting insulin titration. Scores on questionnaire range from 0 to 6: 0 = very dissatisfied, 6 = very satisfied.

    Time frame: 12 weeks (approximately 3 months)

  5. Change in Treatment Satisfaction

    The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change (DTSQc) will be used to measure the change in the patient's satisfaction with his/her diabetes treatment since initiation of long-acting insulin titration. Scores on questionnaire range from -3 to +3: -3 = much less satisfied now, +3 = much more satisfied now.

    Time frame: 12 weeks (approximately 3 months)

  6. Incidence of Hypoglycemia

    The number of instances of hypoglycemia as indicated by fasting blood glucose levels or symptoms reported by patients in both study arms.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Text Message Responses

    The number of text message replies from participants compared to the total number of text messages sent to participants (asking for blood glucose values). This outcome is given as a percent.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Percentage of Successful Phone Calls

    The number of successful insulin titration phone calls compared to the total number of insulin titration phone calls assigned to the nurse. Successful phone calls are defined as when the nurse was able to reach the participant with one call attempt, two call attempts, or by voicemail. This outcome is given as a percent.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Patient Healthcare Utilization

    The number of medication refill, emergency department, and walk-in clinic visits at Bellevue Hospital (non-insulin titration visits).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Costs - Provider Time Spent on Insulin Titration Visits

    Provider time spent on insulin titration visits by phone compared to insulin titration visits in the clinic.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Costs - Titration Visit Information

    The number of insulin titration visits (whether by phone or in the clinic).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Costs - Patient Travel Time

    The time it took patients to travel to Bellevue Hospital, reported by patients in both study arms at baseline and at any subsequent clinic visits.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Costs - Co-pays

    At baseline, participants in both study arms (MITI and CBP) reported whether they had to pay co-pays for clinic visits at Bellevue Hospital.

    Time frame: baseline

  8. Qualitative Patient Satisfaction Interview

    The study staff will interview MITI arm patients, using free-response questions, to assess their satisfaction with the intervention. The interviews will take place in person or over the phone at the patient's convenience, after the patient has reached his/her optimal insulin dose. If the patient does not reach optimal insulin dose, the interview will take place at approximately 12 weeks.

    Time frame: After patient reaches optimal insulin dose or at 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Oct 12, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Started3328
Completed2826
Not completed52
Withdrew: Phone incompatible with texting platform30
Withdrew: Did not enroll in texting platform10
Withdrew: Did not initiate insulin treatment10
Withdrew: Phenotypic type 1 diabetes01
Withdrew: Discontinued insulin - possible allergy01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Subjects Who Reach Optimal Long-acting Insulin Dose
Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Optimal Long-acting Insulin Dose
percentage of participantsMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Optimal Long-acting Insulin Dose8837
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention vs Current Best Practice · Chi-squared · p = <0.0001
SecondaryTime to Reach Optimal Long-acting Insulin Dose

The time it takes a patient to reach his/her optimal long-acting insulin dose will be measured for both study arms.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Reach Optimal Long-acting Insulin Dose
weeksMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Time to Reach Optimal Long-acting Insulin Dose3.00 (1.29 to 4.86)7.07 (2.96 to 9.61)
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention vs Current Best Practice · Interval-censoring survival analysis · p = 0.007
SecondaryHemoglobin A1c

Change in hemoglobin A1c

Time frame:
baseline, 12 weeks (approximately 3 months)
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Hemoglobin A1c
mg/dLMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Hemoglobin A1c-1.90 ± 2.64-1.81 ± 2.63
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention vs Current Best Practice · Wilcoxon rank-sum test · p = 0.99
SecondaryBaseline Treatment Satisfaction

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire standard (DTSQs) will be used to measure the patient's satisfaction with diabetes treatment received prior to study participation. Scores on questionnaire range from 0 to 6: 0 = very dissatisfied, 6 = very satisfied.

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on satisfaction scale
Baseline Treatment Satisfaction
score on satisfaction scaleMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Baseline Treatment Satisfaction4.99 ± 1.145.20 ± 0.61
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention vs Current Best Practice · Wilcoxon rank-sum test · p = 0.78
SecondaryTreatment Satisfaction After Initiation of Insulin Titration

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire standard (DTSQs) will be used to measure the patient's satisfaction with diabetes treatment received since initiation of long-acting insulin titration. Scores on questionnaire range from 0 to 6: 0 = very dissatisfied, 6 = very satisfied.

Time frame:
12 weeks (approximately 3 months)
Reported as:
Mean · score on satisfaction scale
Treatment Satisfaction After Initiation of Insulin Titration
score on satisfaction scaleMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Treatment Satisfaction After Initiation of Insulin Titration5.74 ± 0.545.53 ± 0.52
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention vs Current Best Practice · Wilcoxon rank-sum test · p = 0.04
SecondaryChange in Treatment Satisfaction

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change (DTSQc) will be used to measure the change in the patient's satisfaction with his/her diabetes treatment since initiation of long-acting insulin titration. Scores on questionnaire range from -3 to +3: -3 = much less satisfied now, +3 = much more satisfied now.

Time frame:
12 weeks (approximately 3 months)
Reported as:
Mean · score on satisfaction scale
Change in Treatment Satisfaction
score on satisfaction scaleMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Change in Treatment Satisfaction2.71 ± 0.712.42 ± 0.95
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention vs Current Best Practice · Wilcoxon rank-sum test · p = 0.13
SecondaryIncidence of Hypoglycemia

The number of instances of hypoglycemia as indicated by fasting blood glucose levels or symptoms reported by patients in both study arms.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · instances of hypoglycemia
Incidence of Hypoglycemia
instances of hypoglycemiaMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Incidence of Hypoglycemia53
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Text Message Responses

The number of text message replies from participants compared to the total number of text messages sent to participants (asking for blood glucose values). This outcome is given as a percent.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of text messages
Percentage of Text Message Responses
percentage of text messagesMobile Insulin Titration Intervention
Percentage of Text Message Responses84
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Successful Phone Calls

The number of successful insulin titration phone calls compared to the total number of insulin titration phone calls assigned to the nurse. Successful phone calls are defined as when the nurse was able to reach the participant with one call attempt, two call attempts, or by voicemail. This outcome is given as a percent.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of phone calls
Percentage of Successful Phone Calls
percentage of phone callsMobile Insulin Titration Intervention
Percentage of Successful Phone Calls91
Other pre-specifiedPatient Healthcare Utilization

The number of medication refill, emergency department, and walk-in clinic visits at Bellevue Hospital (non-insulin titration visits).

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · hospital visits
Patient Healthcare Utilization
hospital visitsMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Patient Healthcare Utilization611
Other pre-specifiedCosts - Provider Time Spent on Insulin Titration Visits

Provider time spent on insulin titration visits by phone compared to insulin titration visits in the clinic.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Costs - Provider Time Spent on Insulin Titration Visits
minutesInsulin Titration Visits by PhoneInsulin Titration Visits in the Clinic
Costs - Provider Time Spent on Insulin Titration Visits6 (3 to 10)30 (20 to 45)
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Titration Visits by Phone vs Insulin Titration Visits in the Clinic · Generalized estimating equation modeling · p = 0.008
Other pre-specifiedCosts - Titration Visit Information

The number of insulin titration visits (whether by phone or in the clinic).

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Median · insulin titration visits
Costs - Titration Visit Information
insulin titration visitsMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
Costs - Titration Visit Information3.5 (2 to 5)2 (1 to 3)
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention vs Current Best Practice · Wilcoxon rank-sum test · p = 0.003
Other pre-specifiedCosts - Patient Travel Time

The time it took patients to travel to Bellevue Hospital, reported by patients in both study arms at baseline and at any subsequent clinic visits.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Costs - Patient Travel Time
minutesAll Participants
Costs - Patient Travel Time45 (30 to 60)
Other pre-specifiedCosts - Co-pays

At baseline, participants in both study arms (MITI and CBP) reported whether they had to pay co-pays for clinic visits at Bellevue Hospital.

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Number · participants
Costs - Co-pays
participantsAll Participants
Costs - Co-pays37
Other pre-specifiedQualitative Patient Satisfaction Interview

The study staff will interview MITI arm patients, using free-response questions, to assess their satisfaction with the intervention. The interviews will take place in person or over the phone at the patient's convenience, after the patient has reached his/her optimal insulin dose. If the patient does not reach optimal insulin dose, the interview will take place at approximately 12 weeks.

Time frame:
After patient reaches optimal insulin dose or at 12 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention—0/28 (0%)3/28 (10.7%)
Current Best Practice—0/27 (0%)3/27 (11.1%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best Practice
mild hypoglycemiaGeneral disorders3/282/27
mild possible allergy to insulinGeneral disorders0/281/27

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Mobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best PracticeTotal
Mean48.48 ± 11.2244.61 ± 9.9746.70 ± 10.75
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Mobile Insulin Titration InterventionCurrent Best PracticeTotal
Female151631
Male181230
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Adult Primary Care Clinic, Bellevue Hospital Center
    New York, New York 10016, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J; Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003 Nov;26(11):3080-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.3080. PubMed 14578243 ↗
  • Davies M, Storms F, Shutler S, Bianchi-Biscay M, Gomis R; ATLANTUS Study Group. Improvement of glycemic control in subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: comparison of two treatment algorithms using insulin glargine. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jun;28(6):1282-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.6.1282. PubMed 15920040 ↗
  • Davies M, Lavalle-Gonzalez F, Storms F, Gomis R; AT.LANTUS Study Group. Initiation of insulin glargine therapy in type 2 diabetes subjects suboptimally controlled on oral antidiabetic agents: results from the AT.LANTUS trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 May;10(5):387-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00873.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18. PubMed 18355327 ↗
  • Blonde L, Merilainen M, Karwe V, Raskin P; TITRATE Study Group. Patient-directed titration for achieving glycaemic goals using a once-daily basal insulin analogue: an assessment of two different fasting plasma glucose targets - the TITRATE study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Jun;11(6):623-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01060.x. PubMed 19515182 ↗
  • Arora S, Peters AL, Agy C, Menchine M. A mobile health intervention for inner city patients with poorly controlled diabetes: proof-of-concept of the TExT-MED program. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Jun;14(6):492-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0252. Epub 2012 Apr 23. PubMed 22524591 ↗
  • Walker EA, Shmukler C, Ullman R, Blanco E, Scollan-Koliopoulus M, Cohen HW. Results of a successful telephonic intervention to improve diabetes control in urban adults: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):2-7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1005. PubMed 21193619 ↗
  • Levy N, Moynihan V, Nilo A, Singer K, Bernik LS, Etiebet MA, Fang Y, Cho J, Natarajan S. The Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention (MITI) for Insulin Adjustment in an Urban, Low-Income Population: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 17;17(7):e180. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4716. PubMed 26187303 ↗
  • Levy N, Moynihan V, Nilo A, Singer K, Bernik LS, Etiebet MA, Fang Y, Cho J, Natarajan S. The Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention (MITI) for Insulin Glargine Titration in an Urban, Low-Income Population: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Mar 13;4(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4206. Erratum In: JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Dec 21;4(4):e138. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5403. PubMed 25794243 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 12, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01879579
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Collaborators
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
Responsible party
Natalie Levy (Assistant Professor of Medicine, NYU Langone Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2013
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Mar 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Results posted
Oct 12, 2015
Last update
Oct 12, 2015

Study contacts

Natalie Levy, MD
principal investigator · NYU Langone Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion