CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01871506Updated Aug 28, 2019Results posted

Integrating Tobacco Treatment Into Cancer Care: A Randomized Controlled Comparative Effectiveness Trial

An interventional study of Standard Care (SC) and Intensive Counseling (IC) in Smoking Cessation, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-28.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
303
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There are currently over 11 million cancer survivors in the U.S. and survival rates are increasing. Unfortunately, 10-30% of cancer patients are current smokers at the time of diagnosis, and many of these patients have elevated socioeconomic, medical, and psychosocial vulnerabilities. Documented risks associated with continued smoking following cancer diagnosis include decreased survival time; increased complications from surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy; and increased risk of second primary tumors. U.S. Department of Health \& Human Services Public Health Service evidence-based tobacco treatment guidelines exist but have not been integrated into the cancer setting. This is a tremendous missed opportunity to address a modifiable risk factor. In recognition of this treatment gap, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored a conference in 2009 to address how to increase the readiness and capacity for delivery of tobacco treatment in Cancer Centers. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommends identification, advice, and counseling of all smokers by their second oncology visit as a core quality indicator; however, currently only half of patients report being asked about tobacco use.

Specific Aim: To conduct a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial of two strategies to promote smoking cessation in suspected or newly diagnosed cancer patients.

Study Design: A multi-site randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial will enroll 295 current smokers with suspected or newly diagnosed melanoma, lymphoma, thoracic, breast, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, head and neck, or gynecologic cancer. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive Intensive Counseling (IC) or "Standard Care" (SC). Both groups will receive an initial motivational counseling session and 3 weekly follow-up counseling sessions with a tobacco treatment counselor, conducted in-person or by telephone. The IC arm has the option to also receive:

  • Smoking Cessation Medication: Up to a 12-week supply of FDA approved smoking cessation medication (Varenicline, bupropion, or combination NRT) at no cost to the participant.
  • Extended Counseling: An additional 4 biweekly and 3 monthly proactive counseling sessions with a tobacco treatment counselor (total of 11 counseling contacts).

All participants will complete 1 baseline and 2 follow-up surveys, at 3 and 6 months. Self-reported abstinence will be biochemically confirmed at 3 and 6 months.

Read the detailed description

Specific Aims

Aim 1: To compare the effectiveness of two tobacco treatments that are integrated into cancer care in producing tobacco abstinence at 6 months.

Aim 2: To explore: a) mechanisms through which treatment promotes abstinence; b) subpopulations in which abstinence is promoted; and c) which aspects of treatment promote abstinence.

Aim 3: To compare the incremental cost effectiveness (cost per quit) of two tobacco treatments.

Exploratory Aim: To identify the percentage and associated characteristics of smokers who 1) enroll in tobacco treatment and 2) adhere to tobacco treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Smoking Cessation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adult men and women may participate in this study if he/she meet the following requirements:

  1. Current, new* patient at one of our three participating study sites: Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cancer Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), or Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI);
  2. Currently with suspected or newly diagnosed cancer (thoracic, breast, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, head and neck, gynecologic, lymphoma, melanoma);
  3. Has smoked a cigarette, even a puff, in the past 30 days;
  4. Is willing to consider trying to quit smoking using counseling and/or smoking cessation medication;
  5. Is English or Spanish speaking (MGH); English speaking (MSK; DFCI);
  6. Has regular telephone access.

[*Patients will be considered "new" and eligible under the following conditions:

  1. if they are attending approximately one of their first 4 visits or are within approximately 3 months of the initial visit date with their primary oncologist at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cancer Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), or Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) for suspected or recently diagnosed cancer;
  2. if they come to the MGH, MSKCC, or DFCI for a second opinion, the patient opts to receive their cancer treatment at any of these institutions;
  3. if they have a past cancer diagnosis, they are currently faced with a local and distant recurrence of tumors;
  4. if they have been treated previously for other types of cancer, they are currently faced with a new form of cancer.]

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

In an effort to be as inclusive as possible, a patient will be excluded only if he/she:

  1. Is NOT currently receiving or has no intentions to receive care at one of three participating cancer treatment centers: Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, or Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI);
  2. Is currently psychiatrically unstable or otherwise unable to provide informed consent as determined by study investigators or oncology clinician;
  3. Is not English or Spanish speaking;
  4. Is medically ineligible (as determined by their treating physician);
  5. Has insufficient comprehension/literacy.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Participant inclusion/exclusion is not based on use of smoking cessation medication -- he/she may decide not to use any smoking cessation medication and still participate in the study. Patients deemed ineligible will be referred to the state quit line.

Patients interested in participating in the study should contact the appropriate contact person, based on whether they are a current patient at the MGH, MSKCC, or DFCI.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
303 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Standard Care (SC)

    Participants randomized to "standard care" (SC) will have the option to receive 4 behavioral counseling sessions with a tobacco treatment counselor and medication advice.

    Behavioral: Standard Care (SC)

  • Experimental
    Intensive Counseling (IC)

    Participants randomized to intensive counseling (IC) will receive the same 4 initial behavioral counseling sessions with a tobacco treatment counselor as participants in the SC arm. IC participants have the option to also receive: * Extended Counseling: An additional 4 biweekly and 3 monthly proactive counseling sessions with a tobacco treatment counselor (total of 11 counseling contacts). * Smoking Cessation Medication: Up to a 12-week supply of FDA approved smoking cessation medication \[varenicline, bupropion, or combination NRT (patch + lozenge)\] at no cost to the participant.

    Behavioral: Intensive Counseling (IC)

Interventions

  • BehavioralStandard Care (SC)

    1. Initial counseling session: The initial counseling session will last approximately 45 minutes and will be conducted in-person or by phone by a tobacco treatment counselor. The session will be structured in a 5 As format and utilize Motivational Interviewing (MI) techniques. 2. 3 Weekly Follow-up Counseling Sessions: SC Patients will be offered 3 weekly proactive follow-up sessions, concentrated on quitting and staying quit throughout cancer treatment. 3. Medication advice: The tobacco counselor will advise SC subjects to use smoking cessation medication to assist with their quit. Smoking cessation medication will not be provided by the study free of cost for SC subjects.

    Also known as: "Standard of Care" Treatment

  • BehavioralIntensive Counseling (IC)

    The IC model includes all components of the SC as well as extended counseling support and up to 90 days of free FDA approved smoking cessation medication. 1. Extended counseling support: Participants in the IC group will be offered the same initial 4 counseling sessions as the SC group as well as 4 additional proactive biweekly sessions and 3 monthly booster sessions. 2. Smoking cessation medication: IC participants will be offered a 4-week supply of FDA-approved smoking cessation medication (varenicline, bupropion or nicotine replacement therapy) of their choice, with the option to renew the medication twice for up to 90 days of free medication. Participants are not required to take smoking cessation medication.

    Also known as: Intensive Treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Biochemically Verified 7-day Point Prevalence Tobacco Abstinence at 6 Months

    Number of participants with 7-day point-prevalence tobacco abstinence at 6-month follow-up, assessed by biochemically confirmed saliva cotinine (\<15 ng/ml76, 82) or \<10 ppm expired air carbon monoxide (CO) for participants concurrently using NRT

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Biochemically Verified 7-day Point Prevalence Tobacco Abstinence at 3 Months

    Number of participants with7 -day point-prevalence tobacco abstinence at 3-month follow-up, assessed by biochemically confirmed saliva cotinine (\<15 ng/ml76, 82) or \<10 ppm expired air carbon monoxide (CO) for participants concurrently using NRT

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Number of Participants With Continuous Tobacco Abstinence

    Number of Participants with Continuous tobacco abstinence (between quit and follow-up) at 3 \& 6 months

    Time frame: 3 months to 6 months

  3. Number of Participants With Sustained Tobacco Abstinence

    Number of Participants with Biochemically confirmed repeated point prevalence abstinence at 3 \& 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Number of Participants With Self-reported 7-day Point Prevalence.

    Number of Participants with Self-reported smoking abstinence of at least 7 days

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. The Number of IT Participants Who Used Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy

    The number of IT participants who used 1) smoking cessation pharmacotherapy (Y/N dispensed) 2) smoking cessation counseling (Y/N), 3) 1-2 4-week refills, 4) took 1-3 monthly booster sessions.

    Time frame: Treatment Initiation to 6 month follow-up

  6. The Number of IT Participants Who Used Smoking Cessation Counseling

    The number of intervention participants who used smoking cessation counseling during the study (Y/N)

    Time frame: Treatment Initiation to 6 Month Follow-up

  7. The Number of IT Participants Who Took 1-2 4-week Refills

    The number of intervention participants who took 1-2 4-week refills of smoking cessation medication

    Time frame: Treatment Initiation to 6 Month Follow-up

  8. The Number of IT Participants Who Took 1-3 Monthly Booster Sessions

    The number of IT participants who took 1-3 monthly booster sessions of smoking cessation counseling

    Time frame: Treatment Initiation to 6 Month Follow-up

  9. Cost-effectiveness

    The cost of the standard of care treatment and the cost of the intensive treatment.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 28, 2019

Participant flow

Between 11/25/2013 and 7/1/2017 4709 patients were screened for eligibility. 2659 were eligible based on screen criteria; 1808 did not complete the screen. Of the 851 who were approached to complete the screen, 405 were ineligible, 303 enrolled and were randomized, and 143 refused (84 refused consent and 59 did not complete the baseline survey)

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
Started150153
Completed150153
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Biochemically Verified 7-day Point Prevalence Tobacco Abstinence at 6 Months

Number of participants with 7-day point-prevalence tobacco abstinence at 6-month follow-up, assessed by biochemically confirmed saliva cotinine (\<15 ng/ml76, 82) or \<10 ppm expired air carbon monoxide (CO) for participants concurrently using NRT

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Biochemically Verified 7-day Point Prevalence Tobacco Abstinence at 6 Months
ParticipantsStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
Number of Participants With Biochemically Verified 7-day Point Prevalence Tobacco Abstinence at 6 Months2951
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Biochemically Verified 7-day Point Prevalence Tobacco Abstinence at 3 Months

Number of participants with7 -day point-prevalence tobacco abstinence at 3-month follow-up, assessed by biochemically confirmed saliva cotinine (\<15 ng/ml76, 82) or \<10 ppm expired air carbon monoxide (CO) for participants concurrently using NRT

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Biochemically Verified 7-day Point Prevalence Tobacco Abstinence at 3 Months
ParticipantsStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
Number of Participants With Biochemically Verified 7-day Point Prevalence Tobacco Abstinence at 3 Months2846
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Continuous Tobacco Abstinence

Number of Participants with Continuous tobacco abstinence (between quit and follow-up) at 3 \& 6 months

Time frame:
3 months to 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Continuous Tobacco Abstinence
ParticipantsStandard TreatmentIntensive Treatment)
Number of Participants With Continuous Tobacco Abstinence2643
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Sustained Tobacco Abstinence

Number of Participants with Biochemically confirmed repeated point prevalence abstinence at 3 \& 6 months

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Sustained Tobacco Abstinence
ParticipantsStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
Number of Participants With Sustained Tobacco Abstinence1735
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Self-reported 7-day Point Prevalence.

Number of Participants with Self-reported smoking abstinence of at least 7 days

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Self-reported 7-day Point Prevalence.
ParticipantsStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
Number of Participants With Self-reported 7-day Point Prevalence.4254
SecondaryThe Number of IT Participants Who Used Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy

The number of IT participants who used 1) smoking cessation pharmacotherapy (Y/N dispensed) 2) smoking cessation counseling (Y/N), 3) 1-2 4-week refills, 4) took 1-3 monthly booster sessions.

Time frame:
Treatment Initiation to 6 month follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of IT Participants Who Used Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy
ParticipantsStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
The Number of IT Participants Who Used Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy—122
SecondaryThe Number of IT Participants Who Used Smoking Cessation Counseling

The number of intervention participants who used smoking cessation counseling during the study (Y/N)

Time frame:
Treatment Initiation to 6 Month Follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of IT Participants Who Used Smoking Cessation Counseling
ParticipantsStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
The Number of IT Participants Who Used Smoking Cessation Counseling—153
SecondaryThe Number of IT Participants Who Took 1-2 4-week Refills

The number of intervention participants who took 1-2 4-week refills of smoking cessation medication

Time frame:
Treatment Initiation to 6 Month Follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of IT Participants Who Took 1-2 4-week Refills
ParticipantsStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
The Number of IT Participants Who Took 1-2 4-week Refills—87
SecondaryThe Number of IT Participants Who Took 1-3 Monthly Booster Sessions

The number of IT participants who took 1-3 monthly booster sessions of smoking cessation counseling

Time frame:
Treatment Initiation to 6 Month Follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of IT Participants Who Took 1-3 Monthly Booster Sessions
ParticipantsStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
The Number of IT Participants Who Took 1-3 Monthly Booster Sessions—99
SecondaryCost-effectiveness

The cost of the standard of care treatment and the cost of the intensive treatment.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · dollars
Cost-effectiveness
dollarsStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment
Cost-effectiveness638 (570 to 710)1144 (1061 to 1231)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events for each participant was collected over a 6-month period: from baseline to 6 month follow-up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard Treatment (ST)9/150 (6%)0/150 (0%)17/150 (11.3%)
Intensive Treatment (IT)4/153 (2.6%)0/153 (0%)41/153 (26.8%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent other events
EventStandard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)
NauseaGeneral disorders6/15013/153
RashGeneral disorders1/1504/153
Mouth irritationGeneral disorders0/1504/153
HiccupsGeneral disorders1/1503/153
Difficulty sleepingGeneral disorders2/1503/153
Vivid dreamsGeneral disorders2/1503/153
HeadacheGeneral disorders2/1501/153
SIADHGeneral disorders0/1502/153
FlatulenceGeneral disorders1/1501/153
HeartburnGeneral disorders1/1500/153

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)Total
Mean58 ± 9.558 ± 9.958 ± 9.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)Total
Female8387170
Male6766133
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)Total
Hispanic or Latino4711
Not Hispanic or Latino146146292
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native123
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American171431
White131134265
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported022
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Standard Treatment (ST)Intensive Treatment (IT)Total
United States150153303
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Park ER, Perez GK, Regan S, Muzikansky A, Levy DE, Temel JS, Rigotti NA, Pirl WF, Irwin KE, Partridge AH, Cooley ME, Friedman ER, Rabin J, Ponzani C, Hyland KA, Holland S, Borderud S, Sprunck K, Kwon D, Peterson L, Miller-Sobel J, Gonzalez I, Whitlock CW, Malloy L, de Leon-Sanchez S, O'Brien M, Ostroff JS. Effect of Sustained Smoking Cessation Counseling and Provision of Medication vs Shorter-term Counseling and Medication Advice on Smoking Abstinence in Patients Recently Diagnosed With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Oct 13;324(14):1406-1418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14581. PubMed 33048154 ↗
  • Park ER, Ostroff JS, Perez GK, Hyland KA, Rigotti NA, Borderud S, Regan S, Muzikansky A, Friedman ER, Levy DE, Holland S, Eusebio J, Peterson L, Rabin J, Miller-Sobel J, Gonzalez I, Malloy L, O'Brien M, de Leon-Sanchez S, Whitlock CW. Integrating tobacco treatment into cancer care: Study protocol for a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Sep;50:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 19. PubMed 27444428 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 10, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01871506
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Responsible party
Elyse Park, PhD (Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 6, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
May 2018
Completion
May 2018
Results posted
Aug 28, 2019
Last update
Aug 28, 2019

Study contacts

Elyse R Park, Ph.D., MPH
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital
Jamie S. Ostroff, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion