CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01867294Updated Jan 9, 2020Results posted

Spironolactone in Preventing Rash in Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Panitumumab and Cetuximab

A Phase 2 interventional study of Doxycycline and Management of Therapy Complications in Advanced Malignant Neoplasm and Dermatologic Complication, sponsored by Academic and Community Cancer Research United. Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-09.

Sponsored by Academic and Community Cancer Research United · Phase 2, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized phase II trial studies how well giving spironolactone works in preventing rash in patients with cancer that has spread to other places in the body and are receiving panitumumab and cetuximab. Spironolactone may prevent endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-induced skin rash.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine feasibility of the administration of topical spironolactone versus placebo in this patient population. (Study I) II. To further explore the efficacy of the topical spironolactone to prevent/attenuate rash from EGFR inhibitors. (Study II)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To explore efficacy of the spironolactone versus placebo. (Study I) II. To describe the efficacy of a Modified Preemptive Therapy Regimen intervention. (Study II) III. To explore the adverse event profile of spironolactone and the Modified Preemptive Therapy Regimen intervention. (Study II) IV. To explore patient reported outcomes of patients using spironolactone and a Modified Preemptive Therapy Regimen intervention. (Study II) V. To explore long term (8 week) effect of the 4 week treatment of spironolactone and a Modified Preemptive Therapy Regimen intervention on EFGR induced rash. (Study II)

OUTLINE:

STUDY I: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients apply spironolactone topically to face twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.

ARM II: Patients apply placebo topically to face BID for 4 weeks.

STUDY II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients apply spironolactone topically to face and body BID for 4 weeks

ARM II: Patients undergo modified preemptive therapy regimen consisting of skin moisturizer topically BID, sunscreen topically before going outside, hydrocortisone topically once daily (QD), and doxycycline orally (PO) BID for 4 weeks.

After completion of study, patients are followed up for 4 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Malignant Neoplasm
  • Dermatologic Complication

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Academic and Community Cancer Research United is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 12 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled to start panitumumab or cetuximab; patients must not have been on the EGFR agent prior to randomization
  • Ability to reliably apply topical spironolactone/placebo twice a day to the face
  • Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
  • For study 2 only, patients must be willing to avoid sun exposure for one month from registration
  • Creatinine =\< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (UNL)
  • For Study 2 only, ability to apply topical creams to the entire face and body

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior allergic reaction or severe intolerance to spironolactone
  • Any rash at the time of randomization
  • Cutaneous metastases
  • Any other disorder that may predispose to hyperkalemia in the opinion of the treating oncologist
  • Use of topical corticosteroids at the time of study or their anticipated use in the next 8 weeks; (it is acknowledged that patients may be starting these agents pre-emptively as part of this protocol)
  • For study 2 only, previous intolerance of sunscreen or any of the other components of the Modified Preemptive Therapy Regimen (a moisturizer or oral doxycycline)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I (Study I)

    Patients apply spironolactone topically to face BID for 4 weeks.

    Other: Questionnaire Administration · Drug: Spironolactone

  • Experimental
    Arm I (Study II)

    Patients apply spironolactone topically to face and body BID for 4 weeks.

    Other: Questionnaire Administration · Drug: Spironolactone

  • Placebo comparator
    Arm II (Study I)

    Patients apply placebo topically to face BID for 4 weeks.

    Other: Placebo · Other: Questionnaire Administration

  • Active comparator
    Arm II (Study II)

    Patients receive modified preemptive therapy regimen consisting of skin moisturizer topically BID, sunscreen topically as needed, hydrocortisone topically QD, and doxycycline PO BID for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Doxycycline · Procedure: Management of Therapy Complications · Other: Questionnaire Administration · Drug: Sunscreen · Drug: Therapeutic Hydrocortisone

Interventions

  • DrugDoxycycline

    Given PO

    Also known as: Doxycycline Monohydrate

  • ProcedureManagement of Therapy Complications

    Moisturizer given topically

  • OtherPlacebo

    Given topically

    Also known as: placebo therapy, PLCB, sham therapy

  • OtherQuestionnaire Administration

    Ancillary studies

  • DrugSpironolactone

    Given topically

    Also known as: 17-Hydroxy-7alpha-mercapto-3-oxo-17alpha-pregn-4-ene-21-carboxylic Acid, gamma Lactone, Acetate, Aldactone, SC 9420, SPL

  • DrugSunscreen

    Given topically

    Also known as: Sunblock

  • DrugTherapeutic Hydrocortisone

    Given topically

    Also known as: Aeroseb-HC, Barseb HC, Barseb-HC, Cetacort, Cort-Dome, Cortef, Cortenema, Cortifan, Cortisol, Cortispray, Cortril, Dermacort, Domolene, Eldecort, Hautosone, Heb-Cort, hydrocortisone, Hydrocortone, Hytone, Komed-HC, Nutracort, Proctocort, Rectoid

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients Reporting a Grade 2+ Adverse Event Attributed to Spironolactone (Study I)

    Adverse events were collected at the end of one 4-week cycle and one 4-week observation period according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) CTEP Version 4.0. The number of patients reporting a grade 2+ adverse event attributed to spironolactone is reported here.

    Time frame: At 8 weeks

  2. Incidence of Truncal/Extremity Rash of Any Grade in Patients in the Spironolactone Arm (Study I)

    Adverse events were collected at the end of each 4-week cycle according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) CTEP Version 4.0. The number of patients reporting a truncal/extremity adverse event is reported here. The treatment will be considered feasible if at least 50% of patients in the spironolactone arm develop a truncal/extremity rash of any grade at the end of 4 weeks.

    Time frame: At 4 weeks

  3. Percentage of Patients in the Spironolactone Arm Who Complete the 4-week Study Intervention (Study I)

    The number of patients able to complete the 4-week study intervention and the 4-week observation period are reported.

    Time frame: At 4 weeks

  4. Efficacy of the Spironolactone Treatment to Prevent/Attenuate Rash From EGFR Inhibitors in This Patient Population Defined as Absence of Any Grade 2 or Worse Rash (Study II)

    The primary analysis will be descriptive in nature, and will involve an intent-to-treat analysis at the end of week 4. Patients will be categorized dichotomously according to healthcare provider reported grade 2 or worse rash. The absence of any grade 2 or worse rash will be a success and the existence of any such rash will be a failure. Patients who do not complete the 4 week treatment will be considered a failure. Point estimates and 95% confidence limits will be calculated.

    Time frame: At 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Spironolactone and Placebo Measured by the Use of the Brief Pictorial Rash Incidence Questionnaire (Study I)

    Patients will be dichotomously categorized as a success if no rash is reported and a failure if rash exists at the end of 4 weeks. The number of patients that successfully completed 4 weeks of treatment and reported no rash on the Brief Pictorial Rash Incidence Questionnaire are reported.

    Time frame: At 4 weeks

  2. Efficacy of the Modified Preemptive Therapy Regimen, Calculated and Analyzed Analogously to the Efficacy of the Spironolactone (Study II)

    All secondary endpoints will be reported descriptively using frequency statistics and single sample t-tests. Outcomes with respect to baseline covariates will also be explored.

    Time frame: At 4 weeks

  3. Efficacy of the Spironolactone Treatment to Prevent/Attenuate Rash From EGFR Inhibitors in This Patient Population Defined as Absence of Any Grade 2 or Worse Rash (Study II)

    This analysis will be descriptive in nature, and will involve an intent-to-treat analysis at the end of week 8. Patients will be categorized dichotomously according to healthcare provider reported grade 2 or worse rash. The absence of any grade 2 or worse rash will be a success and the existence of any such rash will be a failure. Patients who do not complete the 8 week treatment will be considered a failure. Point estimates and 95% confidence limits will be calculated.

    Time frame: At 8 weeks

  4. Incidence of Healthcare Provider Reported Adverse Events (Study II)

    All secondary endpoints will be reported descriptively using frequency statistics and single sample t-tests. Outcomes with respect to baseline covariates will also be explored.

    Time frame: At 8 weeks

  5. Patient Reported Outcomes as Measured by the Change From Baseline in the SKINDEX-16 Total Score (Study II)

    Total scores from the SKINDEX-16 will be compared from baseline to week 4. Comparisons between treatment arms will be made by t-tests.

    Time frame: At 4 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jan 9, 2020

Participant flow

Study II was never opened due to the accrual rate in Study I.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStudy I: SpironolactoneStudy I: PlaceboStudy II: SpironolactoneStudy II: Modified Therapy
Started91000
Completed8900
Not completed1100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1100

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients Reporting a Grade 2+ Adverse Event Attributed to Spironolactone (Study I)

Adverse events were collected at the end of one 4-week cycle and one 4-week observation period according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) CTEP Version 4.0. The number of patients reporting a grade 2+ adverse event attributed to spironolactone is reported here.

Time frame:
At 8 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Reporting a Grade 2+ Adverse Event Attributed to Spironolactone (Study I)
ParticipantsStudy I: SpironolactoneStudy I: PlaceboStudy II: SpironolactoneStudy II: Modified Therapy
Number of Patients Reporting a Grade 2+ Adverse Event Attributed to Spironolactone (Study I)00——
PrimaryIncidence of Truncal/Extremity Rash of Any Grade in Patients in the Spironolactone Arm (Study I)

Adverse events were collected at the end of each 4-week cycle according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) CTEP Version 4.0. The number of patients reporting a truncal/extremity adverse event is reported here. The treatment will be considered feasible if at least 50% of patients in the spironolactone arm develop a truncal/extremity rash of any grade at the end of 4 weeks.

Time frame:
At 4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Truncal/Extremity Rash of Any Grade in Patients in the Spironolactone Arm (Study I)
ParticipantsStudy I: SpironolactoneStudy I: PlaceboStudy II: SpironolactoneStudy II: Modified Therapy
Incidence of Truncal/Extremity Rash of Any Grade in Patients in the Spironolactone Arm (Study I)66——
PrimaryPercentage of Patients in the Spironolactone Arm Who Complete the 4-week Study Intervention (Study I)

The number of patients able to complete the 4-week study intervention and the 4-week observation period are reported.

Time frame:
At 4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients in the Spironolactone Arm Who Complete the 4-week Study Intervention (Study I)
ParticipantsStudy I: SpironolactoneStudy I: PlaceboStudy II: SpironolactoneStudy II: Modified Therapy
Percentage of Patients in the Spironolactone Arm Who Complete the 4-week Study Intervention (Study I)40——
PrimaryEfficacy of the Spironolactone Treatment to Prevent/Attenuate Rash From EGFR Inhibitors in This Patient Population Defined as Absence of Any Grade 2 or Worse Rash (Study II)

The primary analysis will be descriptive in nature, and will involve an intent-to-treat analysis at the end of week 4. Patients will be categorized dichotomously according to healthcare provider reported grade 2 or worse rash. The absence of any grade 2 or worse rash will be a success and the existence of any such rash will be a failure. Patients who do not complete the 4 week treatment will be considered a failure. Point estimates and 95% confidence limits will be calculated.

Time frame:
At 4 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryEfficacy of Spironolactone and Placebo Measured by the Use of the Brief Pictorial Rash Incidence Questionnaire (Study I)

Patients will be dichotomously categorized as a success if no rash is reported and a failure if rash exists at the end of 4 weeks. The number of patients that successfully completed 4 weeks of treatment and reported no rash on the Brief Pictorial Rash Incidence Questionnaire are reported.

Time frame:
At 4 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Efficacy of Spironolactone and Placebo Measured by the Use of the Brief Pictorial Rash Incidence Questionnaire (Study I)
participantsStudy I: SpironolactoneStudy I: PlaceboStudy II: SpironolactoneStudy II: Modified Therapy
Efficacy of Spironolactone and Placebo Measured by the Use of the Brief Pictorial Rash Incidence Questionnaire (Study I)12——
SecondaryEfficacy of the Modified Preemptive Therapy Regimen, Calculated and Analyzed Analogously to the Efficacy of the Spironolactone (Study II)

All secondary endpoints will be reported descriptively using frequency statistics and single sample t-tests. Outcomes with respect to baseline covariates will also be explored.

Time frame:
At 4 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryEfficacy of the Spironolactone Treatment to Prevent/Attenuate Rash From EGFR Inhibitors in This Patient Population Defined as Absence of Any Grade 2 or Worse Rash (Study II)

This analysis will be descriptive in nature, and will involve an intent-to-treat analysis at the end of week 8. Patients will be categorized dichotomously according to healthcare provider reported grade 2 or worse rash. The absence of any grade 2 or worse rash will be a success and the existence of any such rash will be a failure. Patients who do not complete the 8 week treatment will be considered a failure. Point estimates and 95% confidence limits will be calculated.

Time frame:
At 8 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryIncidence of Healthcare Provider Reported Adverse Events (Study II)

All secondary endpoints will be reported descriptively using frequency statistics and single sample t-tests. Outcomes with respect to baseline covariates will also be explored.

Time frame:
At 8 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPatient Reported Outcomes as Measured by the Change From Baseline in the SKINDEX-16 Total Score (Study II)

Total scores from the SKINDEX-16 will be compared from baseline to week 4. Comparisons between treatment arms will be made by t-tests.

Time frame:
At 4 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were assessed after one 4 week cycle, and after one 4-week observation prior for a maximum of up to 8 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Study I: Placebo2/9 (22.2%)2/9 (22.2%)8/9 (88.9%)
Study I: Spironolactone0/8 (0%)2/8 (25%)6/8 (75%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 28
Most frequent serious events
EventStudy I: PlaceboStudy I: Spironolactone
Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders0/91/8
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/91/8
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/91/8
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/90/8
Abdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders1/90/8
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/90/8
AscitesGastrointestinal disorders1/90/8
IleusGastrointestinal disorders1/90/8
Death NOSGeneral disorders1/90/8
FatigueGeneral disorders1/90/8
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventStudy I: PlaceboStudy I: Spironolactone
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/96/8
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/95/8
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations2/90/8
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations0/91/8
White blood cell decreasedInvestigations0/91/8
HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/91/8
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/90/8
Hearing impairedEar and labyrinth disorders1/90/8
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/90/8
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders1/90/8

Baseline characteristics

All patients that were treated and eligible for endpoint analysis were include in baseline characteristics. One patient from Study I: Spironolactone and one from Study I: Placebo withdrew from study participation prior to receiving any study treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Study I: SpironolactoneStudy I: PlaceboStudy II: SpironolactoneStudy II: Modified TherapyTotal
Median65.0 (55.0 to 77.0)60.6 (39.0 to 82.0)——62.6 (39 to 82)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Study I: SpironolactoneStudy I: PlaceboStudy II: SpironolactoneStudy II: Modified TherapyTotal
Female22——4
Male67——13
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Study I: SpironolactoneStudy I: PlaceboStudy II: SpironolactoneStudy II: Modified TherapyTotal
United States89——17
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Carle Cancer Center
    Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
  • Iowa-Wide Oncology Research Coalition NCORP
    Des Moines, Iowa 50309, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas - Wichita
    Wichita, Kansas 67214, United States
  • Coborn Cancer Center at Saint Cloud Hospital
    Saint Cloud, Minnesota 56303, United States
  • Marshfield Clinic
    Marshfield, Wisconsin 54449, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01867294
Lead sponsor
Academic and Community Cancer Research United
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2013
Start date
Aug 31, 2012
Primary completion
May 9, 2014
Completion
Jun 13, 2014
Results posted
Jan 9, 2020
Last update
Jan 9, 2020

Study contacts

Aminah Jatoi
principal investigator · Academic and Community Cancer Research United

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion