CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01863836Updated Sep 20, 2016

Study on the Influence of Fluoroscopy in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Lesions With Endobronchial Ultrasound Guidance

An interventional study of Fluoroscopy and Radial EBUS-guided biopsy in Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, sponsored by Laval University. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-20.

Sponsored by Laval University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
133
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of fluoroscopy improves the diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions' biopsy guided by radial endobronchial ultrasound (with the use of a guide sheath).

Read the detailed description

See above

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

Keywords

  • Radial endobronchial ultrasound
  • Peripheral lung lesion
  • Fluoroscopy
  • Lung cancer
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Laval University is the lead sponsor of 371 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Consecutive patients referred for the bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions at the Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec(not visible endobronchially)
  • Adults over the age of 18

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Antiplatelet therapy other than aspirin
  • Known hemorrhagic diathesis
  • Acute respiratory failure
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
133 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fluoroscopy

    Patients will undergo bronchoscopy and radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy of a peripheral lung lesion like patients in the other group. However, single-plane fluoroscopy will be used to help locate the lesion (with the help of a steerable curette) in case of failure to locate the lesion, and it will also be used to guide tissue sampling and ensure appropriate sampling tool function. Transbronchial biopsies, transbronchial needle aspiration, brushings, and bronchoalveolar lavage will be performed for each lesion.

    Procedure: Fluoroscopy · Procedure: Radial EBUS-guided biopsy

  • Active comparator
    No fluoroscopy

    Patients will undergo biopsy of peripheral lung lesions using radial endobronchial ultrasound guidance only, without the use of fluoroscopy. Transbronchial biopsies, transbronchial needle aspiration, brushings, and bronchoalveolar lavage will be performed for each lesion.

    Procedure: Radial EBUS-guided biopsy

Interventions

  • ProcedureFluoroscopy
  • ProcedureRadial EBUS-guided biopsy
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic yield

    Diagnostic yield of radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy for peripheral lung lesions defined as the proportion of patients in whom a specific diagnosis is established by radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy. The analysis will be stratified by lesion size, location, the presence of the bronchus sign, type of echographic image obtained (central/peripheral), physician involved, resident involvement.

    Time frame: Upon production of pathology results, usually within 2 weeks after the test

  2. Sensitivity and specificity

    Sensitivity and specificity are determined separately for malignancy and benign etiologies. Case records will be reviewed for patients with non-diagnostic specimen and results from other diagnostic procedures (TTNA, surgical biopsy) will be reviewed. For patients without further diagnostic tests, stability or progression of the lesion over time will be used for etiology attribution.

    Time frame: Upon completion of ancillary or confirmatory tests, usually within 2 months after the test

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lesion localization

    Proportion of patients in whom the peripheral pulmonary lesion was localized using the radial endobronchial ultrasound.

    Time frame: Immediate (during the test)

  2. Procedure duration

    Total duration of the bronchoscopic test.

    Time frame: During the test

  3. Complications

    occurrence of pneumothorax (and its management), bleeding more than 50ml, sustained desaturation below 90%, cardiac dysrhythmias, or any other adverse events occuring during or after the procedure.

    Time frame: Immediately during the test and up to 4 hours after the test

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval
    Québec, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 20, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01863836
Lead sponsor
Laval University
Responsible party
Antoine Delage (MD, Laval University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 29, 2013
Start date
Apr 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Last update
Sep 20, 2016

Study contacts

Antoine Delage, MD
principal investigator · Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion